<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8" ?><feed
	xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xml:lang="en-US"
	xmlns:thr="http://purl.org/syndication/thread/1.0"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>
	<title type="text">
	Comments on Background warnings from economists Pension system about to collapse? Too few contributors and high household burdens &#8211; experts repeatedly point out the problems of statutory pension insurance. Does that inevitably lead to retirement at 68 or even 70? By A. Braun.	</title>
	<subtitle type="text">Spress is a general newspaper in English which is updated 24 hours a day.</subtitle>

	<updated>2021-06-23T23:20:13Z</updated>

	<link rel="alternate" type="text/html" href="https://en.spress.net/background-warnings-from-economists-pension-system-about-to-collapse-too-few-contributors-and-high-household-burdens-experts-repeatedly-point-out-the-problems-of-statutory-pension-insurance-does-t/#respond" />
	<link rel="self" type="application/atom+xml" href="https://en.spress.net/background-warnings-from-economists-pension-system-about-to-collapse-too-few-contributors-and-high-household-burdens-experts-repeatedly-point-out-the-problems-of-statutory-pension-insurance-does-t/feed/atom/" />
	<id>https://en.spress.net/background-warnings-from-economists-pension-system-about-to-collapse-too-few-contributors-and-high-household-burdens-experts-repeatedly-point-out-the-problems-of-statutory-pension-insurance-does-t/feed/atom/</id>

</feed>