According to editor Doroteya Borisova of biên PhoneArena , how Apple handles the account depends on whether relatives seek legal intervention or not. In iCloud’s terms and conditions, Apple says that it can proactively delete iCloud accounts that have been inactive for a year or more, or have been discontinued by users. The data stored in the iPhone, iCloud of the deceased is a difficult problem to handle if the loved one does not have their password. Photo: iMore. This provision indicates that Apple may, in its sole discretion, check whether an account has been discontinued before proceeding with the deletion of the account. However, this will be notified 30 days in advance via the user’s email. Who can access the iCloud of the deceased? iCloud is inherently where all of your iPhone’s information is stored, including backups, photos, videos, iMessages and texts, and purchase history for Apple services (including music and movies). You can assume that a deceased person’s Apple ID will be assigned to the closest family members, to recover the last stored memories. However, according to the legal terms that the user agreed to from the beginning, the loved one does not automatically access the account of the deceased. The clause also stipulates that if there is an intervention from the law, relatives can access the data of the deceased. The procedure to prove to Apple includes providing the name and Apple ID of the deceased person who is requesting access, proof of ownership of the Apple ID, and a court order. Forgot password feature when logging into iCloud. Photo: lifewire.com Plus, if you can access the deceased person’s iCloud-linked email account, legal troubles won’t be an issue. By using the “Forgot Password” feature when signing in to iCloud, you can easily change your account’s password with the account’s associated email. However, Borisova also noted that this practice may violate Apple’s terms of use, leading to the suspension or termination of the account if detected. Here’s what happened to user Jeff Fischer in 2020. Fischer said he was a relative of a deceased person. This person’s account still has 100 USD payable in iTunes. Fischer said he wants to recover the money and send it back to the account holder’s sister. “It took me a lot of phone calls and emails to Apple support to find an employee who knew these issues. I provide the death certificate and notarized copy of my legal status as the decedent’s representative. However, instead of transferring the money from one Apple ID to another, they insist on closing the account and then issuing a check for the remaining credit,” Fischer said. So what about the iPhone? If the deceased is the only individual with the iPhone’s password, access to the phone is not possible even though you are authorized to access their iCloud. Even the FBI does not have a special way to get the password on the iPhone. The only way is to have to set up iCloud on a separate phone or completely factory reset the iPhone of the deceased. However, this means that any information that has not been backed up on iCloud will be lost. Apple’s Legacy Contact feature in iOS 15 update later this year. Photo: PhoneArena. From iOS 15, iCloud account holders can set up trusted contacts, allowing information to be passed on to these people if the account holder dies. Those on the trusted list can then request access to the deceased person’s account. They just need to provide a copy of the death certificate.

Recently, I had a similar situation. An information page with the domain angiangquetoi.com uses my information “An Giang organizes and controls people and vehicles from outside the province to enter the area” (published on An Giang electronic newspaper on May 30). It is worth mentioning that although the news site still notes the author and the source, it does not use the image of An Giang Newspaper, but uses an image of unknown source. After that, the owner of the Facebook account “QSK” (Long Xuyen City) confirmed that the photo was taken by themselves and shared on their personal Facebook social network, unexpectedly being “stolen” to post in another place. . Although the incident was simple, it affected me a lot personally. Many people who do not understand the story have condemned the journalist for breaking the rules, “sitting for a while and stealing people’s pictures and then writing articles”, “losing to the press” … Talking to reporters, account owners “QSK” expressed: “In the morning, I just posted a photo on social networks, then discovered that the photo had been posted on the angiangquetoi site, without credit. I also thought about the situation that the page stole the content and the author’s name, so I decided to share the information on the social network Facebook for everyone to share. Through that, I ask the Web site to stop using other people’s photos, bluffing, and discrediting journalists.” The news content of An Giang Newspaper was “carried” to the angiangquetoi page reflected by readers Many people confuse the mainstream press with online news sites, between reporters – journalists and individual website administrators. A series of information “view sentences”, “Like sentences” and errors in information on these pages are all attributed to the “crimes” of the press and journalists, with extreme comments. “small don’t study, big become a journalist”. According to Decree No. 72/2013, dated July 15, 2013 of the Government and Circular No. 09/2014/TT-BTTTT, dated August 19, 2014 of the Ministry of Information and Communications, a general website is the website of an agency, organization or enterprise, providing general information on the basis of verbatim and accurate citation of the official source and clearly stating the author’s name or the name of the agency of the main source. mode, time posted, broadcast that information. Internal website is the website of an agency, organization or enterprise, providing information on functions, powers, tasks, organizational apparatus, services, products and industries. and other information for the operation of the same agency, organization or enterprise and does not provide general information. Personal website means an electronic information page set up by an individual or through the use of social networking services to provide and exchange information of that individual, not on behalf of the organization. other organizations or individuals and do not provide aggregated information… E-newspaper is a type of press designed and built as a Website based on the Internet, licensed to operate by the Ministry of Information and Communications. According to the Department of Broadcasting, Television and Electronic Information, “newspapering” a general information website is the current state of this page building an interface, synthesizing, updating news and articles like newspapers, specializing in gathering information. sensational, “View sentence” makes readers mistakenly believe it is an electronic newspaper, causing great influence on society. Many sites are still operating, producing news and articles like press agencies but do not have a license as prescribed. The management and sanctioning sanctions are prescribed, but when dealing with this page, another page pops up. The mainstream press also couldn’t take the time to report violations, so the situation continued. We hope that readers will have a better understanding of electronic newspapers and websites, general electronic information, consider choosing official websites to access correct and timely information. At the same time, it is recommended that the authorities take strong action to handle violations, especially acts of operating in contravention of the principles, purposes and contents of the issued licenses, acts of taking advantage of the website. aggregated electronic information to act as an online newspaper, an electronic magazine, acts of providing sensational information, solicitation, violation of copyright and provisions of the law on intellectual property .

However, livestream has become a “trend” pursued by many people, but not all “creators” create value. Bullshit, vulgar content is posted by many vloggers defiantly to attract attention and receive donations (money and gifts) from viewers. On major live-streaming platforms in the country of billions of people, such as Bilibili, Douyin, and Kuaishou, it is not difficult for viewers to come across images of female vloggers dressed in revealing, offensive clothing and performing erotic acts. Many streamers are banned from showing off their bodies or showing sexual acts to receive donations. Showing off, deceiving viewers Many live broadcast studios often hack the number of followers to create credibility, attract viewers so that they are willing to donate money. The account holders also deliberately fabricated sensational stories, creating conflicts with others to attract viewers of their livestream. “Poor students borrow more than 100,000 yuan to reward female streamers in Nanjing”, “16-year-old teenager rewards female streamers with 1.58 million yuan for 3 months”, “Male cashier appropriated more than 48 million yuan to donate to the live broadcast room”, a series of negative news related to direct money rewards through livestream has caused many controversial streams in the Chinese online community. On May 17, Kuaishou posted a notice saying that live streamer Yin Shihang, an account holder with 8 million followers, had been banned from the platform for “sensational marketing”, “vulgar performances” and false advertising during the livestream on May 15. Initially, Yin introduced to live stream his marriage proposal with girlfriend Tao Lulu. Millions of people watched to witness the special moment of the popular streamer. In the end, he tricked the audience by turning the broadcast into a 5-hour sales show. Yin Shihang was banned from broadcasting when tricking viewers into the livestream. Various live broadcasting platforms are working to strengthen control over violations. Kuaishou has issued a special regulatory notice on “Scripting, Acting and Purchases”, which bans accounts or imposes fines on those who take advantage of family conflicts and other factors unrelated to the issue. sell merchandise to entice fans to buy. In June 2020, Douyin issued a new rule that allows minors to privately award rewards after verification and can be fully refunded. In April 2021, Douyin revealed that a total of 36,000 minors had been refunded in 11 months, with an average refund time of 19.7 hours. At the end of November 2020, the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television of China issued a notice on strengthening the management of livestream and live broadcast of e-commerce. In which, methods such as facial recognition are applied to implement real-name management for broadcasters and users. The new rule also limits the number of rewards users can receive by time, daily and monthly, if there are too many rewards, there will be a reminder message and the reward function will be paused if the limit is exceeded.

Inspector of Hanoi Department of Information and Communications sanctioned Mr. Tran Van Duy for administrative violations. On May 10, the Hanoi Department of Information and Communications issued Decision No. 53/QD-XPVPHC, sanctioning an administrative violation against Mr. Tran Van Duy for providing false information. Specifically, at 19:30 on May 4, Mr. Tran Van Duy (born in 1982 in Hoang Liet ward, Hoang Mai district, Hanoi) used a personal facebook page named “Hanoi Pho” ( address: https://www.facebook.com/hanoiphotv) posted information “Hanoi street is open in the first day of blockade”, accompanied by a video about Hanoi street experience, false information content In fact, violating the provisions of Article 5 of Decree No. 72/2013/ND-CP dated July 15, 2013 of the Government on management, provision and use of Internet services and online information. Facebook account “Hanoi Pho” is a personal electronic information page set up by Mr. Tran Van Duy, through the use of the social network facebook to provide and share information. According to the above regulations, Mr. Duy is only allowed to post personal information, however, Mr. Tran Van Duy has posted on this account information about Hanoi’s cuisine and information about the Covid-19 epidemic. Pursuant to Point a, Clause 3, Article 99 of Decree No. 15/2020/ND-CP dated February 3, 2020 of the Government providing for penalties for administrative violations in the fields of post, telecommunications, radio frequencies, With regard to information technology and electronic transactions, the Inspector of Hanoi Department of Information and Communications has fined Mr. Tran Van Duy for an administrative violation with an amount of VND 12.5 million. The remedy is to force the removal of the offending information.

Tran Van Duy, the owner of the Facebook account “Hanoi Pho” was fined 12.5 million VND for posting false information Specifically, at 19:30 on May 4, 2021, Mr. Tran Van Duy used his personal Facebook page named “Hanoi Pho” to post information “Hanoi Street Thong Thong Thong Day”. The #hnp blockade head is accompanied by a video about Hanoi street experiences on May 4, 2021, with false information content, violating the provisions of Article 5 of Decree No. 72/2013/ND-CP dated May 4, 2021. 15/7/2013 by the Government to manage, provide and use Internet services and information on the network. According to Clause 4, Article 20 of Decree No. 72/2013/ND-CP dated July 15, 2013 of the Government on management, provision and use of Internet services and online information: “Personal information website is Website established by an individual or through the use of social networking services to provide and exchange information of that individual, not on behalf of other organizations or individuals, and not provide aggregate information”. The facebook account “Hanoi Pho” is a personal electronic information page set up by Mr. Tran Van Duy through the use of the social network facebook to provide and share information. According to the above regulations, Mr. Duy is only allowed to post personal information, however, Mr. Tran Van Duy has posted on his facebook account “Hanoi Pho” information about Hanoi’s cuisine and information about the COVID-19 epidemic. . Through verification, the Inspector of Hanoi Department of Information and Communications confirmed that the content of the information posted above is untrue and violates the provisions of Article 5 – Decree No. 72/2013/ND-CP dated 15 July 2013 by the Government to manage, provide and use internet services and information on the network. Pursuant to Point a, Clause 3, Article 99 – Decree No. 15/2020/ND-CP dated February 3, 2020 of the Government providing for penalties for administrative violations in the fields of post, telecommunications, radio frequency On electricity lines, information technology and electronic transactions, the Inspector of Hanoi Department of Information and Communications fined 12.5 million VND for administrative violations against Tran Van Duy. Currently, Tran Van Duy has removed false information on his Facebook account.

Penalty for Facebook account holder for posting false information about Covid-19 translation Specifically, at 19:30 on May 4, 2021, Mr. Tran Van Duy used his personal website facebook called “Ha Noi Pho” (address: https: //www.facebook. com / hanoiphotv) publishes the information “Hanoi Thong Tho Street in the First Day of Blockade #hnp” together with 01 video about Hanoi street experience dated May 4, 2021, content is false information, violation provisions in Article 5 of the Government’s Decree No. 72/2013 / ND-CP dated July 15, 2013 on management, provision and use of Internet services and online information. According to Clause 4 Article 20 of the Government’s Decree No. 72/2013 / ND-CP dated July 15, 2013 on management, provision and use of Internet services and online information: “Personal websites are Personal website means an website established or established by an individual through the use of social networking services to provide and exchange information of that individual, not representing the team. organizations or individuals and do not provide aggregate information “. The facebook account “Hà Nội Phố” is a personal website set up by Mr. Tran Van Duy through the use of facebook social networks to provide and share information. According to the above regulations, Mr. Duy can only post personal information, however, Mr. Tran Van Duy has posted on his facebook account “Hà Nội Phố” information about Hanoi cuisine and information about translation Covid-19. . Pursuant to Point a, Clause 3, Article 99 of the Government’s Decree No. 15/2020 / ND-CP dated February 3, 2020, providing for the sanctioning of administrative violations in the fields of post, telecommunications and radio frequency, In information technology and electronic transactions, the Inspector of the Hanoi Department of Information and Communications sanctioned Mr. Tran Van Duy an amount of 12.5 million VND. Remedy: Forcible removal of infringing information. At the same time, Mr. Duy has removed the infringing information.

Tran Van Duy, Facebook account owner “Hà Nội Phố” was fined 12.5 million VND for posting false information. (Source: Hanoi Department of Information and Communication) May 10, Director Department of Information and Communications of Hanoi Nguyen Thanh Liem said that the unit decided to sanction an administrative violation against Tran Van Duy (born in 1982, residing in Hoang Mai district, Hanoi city), a Facebook account holder named “ Hanoi Street “(Address: https // www.facebook.com / hanoiphotv) due to the behavior of” providing false information. ” Specifically, at 19:30 on May 4, 2021, Tran Van Duy used his Facebook account “Ha Noi Pho” to post information “Hanoi is clear in the first day of blockade” with a video about Hanoi street test on May 4, 2021. Through verification, the Inspector of the Hanoi Department of Information and Communications affirmed that the content of the information posted above is untrue, violating the provisions of Article 5 – Decree No. 72/2013 / ND-CP dated 15 / 7/2013 by the Government to manage, provide and use internet services and online information. Pursuant to Point a, Clause 3, Article 99 – Decree No. 15/2020 / ND-CP dated February 3, 2020 of the Government stipulating sanction administrative violations In the fields of post, telecommunications, radio frequency, information technology and electronic transactions, the Inspector of the Hanoi Department of Information and Communications fined VND 12.5 million for administrative violations against Tran. Literature. Currently, Tran Van Duy has removed false information from his Facebook account./.

Mr. Tran Van Duy, the owner of the facebook account “Hà Nội phố” worked with the authorities for posting false information about the COVID-19 translation. Specifically, at 19:30 a.m. on May 4, 2021, Mr. Tran Van Duy used his personal facebook website called “Ha Noi Pho” (address: https: //www.facebook. com / hanoiphotv) publishes the information “Hanoi City is clear in the first day of blockade” together with a video about Hanoi’s street experience on May 4, 2021, content with false information, violation of regulations in Article 5 of the Government’s Decree No. 72/2013 / ND-CP dated July 15, 2013 on management, provision and use of Internet services and online information. According to Clause 4 Article 20 of the Government’s Decree No. 72/2013 / ND-CP dated July 15, 2013 on management, provision and use of Internet services and online information: “Personal websites are Personal website means an website established or established by an individual through the use of social networking services to provide and exchange information of that individual, not representing the team. organizations or individuals and do not provide aggregate information “. The facebook account “Hà Nội Phố” is a personal website set up by Mr. Tran Van Duy through the use of facebook social networks to provide and share information. According to the above regulations, Mr. Duy can only post personal information, however, Mr. Tran Van Duy has posted on his facebook account “Hà Nội Phố” information about Hanoi cuisine and information about translation COVID 19. Pursuant to Point a, Clause 3, Article 99 of the Government’s Decree No. 15/2020 / ND-CP dated February 3, 2020, providing for the sanctioning of administrative violations in the fields of post, telecommunications and radio frequency, In information technology and electronic transactions, the Inspector of the Hanoi Department of Information and Communications sanctioned Mr. Tran Van Duy an amount of 12.5 million VND. At the same time, Mr. Duy has removed the infringing information.

The video quickly attracted the attention of the online community, received nearly 11 million views and tens of thousands of comments after just a few days of being posted. It is known that the video has recorded the whole process of going to see the house of @themistershade account owner with her husband.

Outside the house the couple wanted to buy.

Accordingly, the house that the couple went to see is in Columbia, Maryland (USA). It is a house consisting of 3 bedrooms, 3 bathrooms, with architecture in Baltimore style and for sale for $ 400,000 (nearly 7 billion).

The house is almost suitable for the couple, from beautiful and modern interior inside, large space to outside scenery. However, something special in the house caught the couple’s attention, causing them to quickly change their minds.

The staircase with a unique design has made the couple give up the idea of ​​buying a house.

It is a staircase designed in a ziczac style with square blocks instead of the usual long ladder. Realizing this super special staircase will make it inconvenient to move, the couple decided to give up the idea of ​​buying the house.

Many people who finished watching the video could not help but feel excited in front of the strange staircase, while some said they would not climb it, especially at night or after sipping a few glasses of wine. A few people said they would still buy a house even though it might be a bit difficult to navigate the unique staircase.

Dinh Kim (According to Metro)