“Investor Net” Jordan

On June 6th, on the black cat complaint, a large number of complaints against Yonghui Supermarket (601933.SH) online shopping platform Yonghui Life APP suddenly emerged, referring to the launch of Yonghui Life APP on June 5 The live broadcast activity of 10,000 people who purchase wine for 999 yuan and get 1499 yuan to purchase Feitian Moutai is suspected of “false propaganda” and “deceptive consumers”, and induce consumption through “false” Moutai purchase qualifications. According to the rough statistics of “Investor Net”, more than 240 people have complained about the live broadcast event. If the minimum consumption is 999 yuan, the amount involved in this part of the consumption is more than 240,000 yuan. This is the second time that Yonghui Supermarket has been criticized by consumers for Moutai related issues this year. In addition, Yonghui Supermarket has also frequently reported food quality problems recently, which has once again triggered a crisis of consumer trust.

The investors in Yonghui Supermarket were also stinged. As of the close on June 11, 2021, Yonghui Supermarket closed at 5.32 yuan per share, and its market value has fallen by more than 20 billion yuan from its highest point since the beginning of this year. In fact, including chairman Zhang Xuansong, Yonghui Supermarket has actively implemented practical actions such as increase in holdings and repurchase to maintain the stock price this year, but it does not seem to bring confidence to the market. “In the embarrassing situation, many investors rushed into the market to increase their shareholding and repurchase, but they were deeply involved. Under this circumstance, investors on the interactive platform began to question Zhang Xuansong’s “left and right hand” behavior. Although Zhang Xuansong increased his holdings of 150 million shares through concerted actions recently, after several operations, he finally held The number of shares of some has decreased by 340 million shares from before the announcement of the increase in holdings.

Consumers accused of “flicking” with Moutai

The above live event was hosted by Yongyuehui Winery, which specializes in high-end liquors under Yonghui Supermarket, and was carried out on the Yonghui Life APP, starting at 18:00 on June 5th. The rule of the event is to purchase 999 yuan of drinks during the live broadcast, and the top 10,000 will be eligible to purchase a 500ml bottle of Feitian Moutai 53 degrees for 1499 yuan. ,

Screenshot of Yonghui Life APP live broadcast

However, according to Black Cat’s complaint, many consumers believe that they have met the conditions, but Yonghui Life APP refused to redeem Moutai coupons.

The user with the ID name “xlli2012” stated in the black cat complaint that he paid at 18:04 and completed an order of 1096 yuan, and the anchor also claimed that there were 2000 people remaining at around 18:06, and Emphasize that consumers who pay before 18:05 are eligible for Moutai coupons. However, until the end of the live broadcast, xlli2012 did not receive Moutai coupons. It asked the customer service. The other party said that due to the hot buying, there was a serious system delay in the payment of the order at the beginning of the event, resulting in delays in the actual ranking broadcast. The display shall prevail, and the coupon will not be renewed if it is not obtained, and the originally purchased drinks are not allowed to be returned. Regarding the situation encountered by itself, xlli201 stated in the complaint that the Yonghui Life APP “deceived customers and made false sales.”

User complaints about live events on Yonghui Life APP. Picture source: Black Cat Complaints

The experience of other complainants is similar to that of xlli2012. They all stated that the payment was completed before the anchor claimed that there were 2,000 places left, but without exception, they did not receive Moutai coupons. The consumer with the ID name “秦Qin岭Lin” said that he successfully paid at 18:04:50 but was not eligible to buy Moutai, while those who paid at 18:08 and paid at 18:11 both purchased For Moutai qualifications, “Qin Qin Ling Lin” was very puzzled about this and asked Yonghui Life APP to “disclose the top 10,000 information and fulfill its promise!”

User complaints about live events on Yonghui Life APP. Picture source: Black Cat Complaints

The rules of the above live broadcast show that the first 10,000 users are satisfied with the “payment completion time”. Why is Qin Ling Lin who paid at 18:04 is not in the top 10,000, but at 18:08 and Are consumers who paid at 18:11 in the top 10,000? In this regard, “Investor Net” tried to contact Yonghui Supermarket to find out the situation, but the other party did not reply.

In response to the above situation, Ding Mengdan, a lawyer at Beijing Yingke (Hangzhou) Law Firm and a special researcher of the E-commerce Research Center of Net Economics, told Investor.com, “Yonghui Life APP provides purchase qualifications to consumers who meet the shopping conditions of 999 yuan. , In order to achieve a competitive advantage by selling goods and gaining traffic, it is a rewarded sales behavior. And Yonghui Life APP should clearly announce the participation conditions, participation methods, qualification redemption time, redemption methods and other information before the reward sales. Before the live broadcast event In the process, Yonghui shall also publicize these contents in a timely manner to ensure the timeliness, effectiveness and accuracy of the live broadcast.”

In addition, if the live broadcast personnel are inconsistent with the real order data and subscription qualification exchange in the background during the oral broadcast process, they should promptly adopt other methods to publicize the list of users who have redeemed qualifications. However, if Yonghui false propaganda, fictitious qualifications and exchange quantity, time, etc., it may be suspected of false propaganda, and its behavior is regulated by the “Anti-Unfair Competition Law” and “Interim Regulations on Regulating Promotional Behavior”. Ding Mengdan added to “Investor Net.”

According to Black Cat’s complaint, the appeals of the 240 consumers mentioned above have been responded to by Yonghui Supermarket. The content of the response has not been made public, and the progress of the complaint of a small number of people has been completed. Although Yonghui Supermarket quickly responded to the demands of these consumers on the Black Cat complaint, it triggered a crisis of trust among some consumers. This is not the first time that Moutai was overturned in Yonghui Supermarket. In March of this year, Beijing Commercial Daily reported that many consumers placed an order on the Yonghui Life APP to buy 53-degree Flying Moutai, but they were told that they could not pick up the goods at the time of delivery. No refunds, questioned Yonghui Supermarket’s “use of Maotai powder”.

Frequent quality problems have seen a significant decline in market value

At the same time, Yonghui Supermarket has been repeatedly named by the supervision and management for food quality problems this year.

On June 1, the Shaanxi Provincial Market Supervision Administration issued a notice on the unqualified 9 batches of food on its official WeChat account. The notice stated that 441 batches of samples of 11 categories of food were inspected for food safety supervision. 9 batches of samples of 5 categories were unqualified, and illegal use of prohibited substances, excessive veterinary drug residue limits, and illegal use of prohibited veterinary drugs were detected, and the quality was not up to standard. The problem of excessive use of food additives. The food sold by the two branches of Shaanxi Yonghui Supermarket Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Shaanxi Yonghui”) has been on the “black list.” Among them, one batch of sulfonamides (total) and trimethoprim sold by Guangshun free-range black-bone chicken sold by Shaanxi Yonghui Xi’an West Chang’an Street Branch did not meet the national food safety standards; Shaanxi Yonghui Hanzhong Xixin Street Branch The sold ice wing root (food category: chicken), a batch of volatile basic nitrogen does not meet the requirements of national food safety standards.

Since the beginning of this year, Shaanxi Yonghui has been named by the regulatory authorities many times. Searching on the WeChat official account of the Shaanxi Provincial Market Supervision Administration with “Yonghui” as the key word, you can find that in addition to the June announcement, it was reported on February and April this year. The food non-conformity notices in January and May are on the list. According to the company’s inquiry, Shaanxi Yonghui is a wholly-owned subsidiary of Yonghui Supermarket.

Image source: WeChat public account of Shaanxi Provincial Market Supervision Administration

In addition, according to People’s Daily Online, in the first quarter of this year, Yonghui Supermarket had 15 batches of unqualified foods in Fuzhou, Putian, Longyan and other locations in Fujian. The number of unqualified product inspections reached 8 times, and the unqualified items of the random inspections involved ofloxacin, enrofloxacin, cadmium, etc.

Yonghui Supermarket, which is plagued by negative news, also suffered a sharp setback this year. In the first quarter of this year, Yonghui Supermarket’s revenue was 26.3 billion yuan, down 9% year-on-year; net profit was 23.32 million yuan, down 98% year-on-year. The stock price has also begun to drop, and the market value has been shrinking. In order to maintain the stock price and increase investor confidence, Yonghui Supermarket announced on November 4, 2020 that it will repurchase at a price of no more than 2.7 billion yuan in a bidding transaction. The company shares 150 million-300 million shares. Affected by the positive repurchase, Yonghui Supermarket’s share price rose 4.13% the next day to close at 8.12 yuan per share. The announcement of the company’s chairman Zhang Xuansong’s shareholding increase was issued on February 2, 2021. He plans to increase his holdings of the company’s shares by 75 million to 150 million shares within the next six months, at a price not exceeding 9 yuan. On the day of the announcement, the company’s stock price rose 5.97% to close at 7.28 yuan per share. However, it can be seen from the longer-term stock price trend that the company’s repurchase plan did not bring about a continuous rise in the stock price, but showed a general downward trend.

Yonghui Supermarket’s repurchase plan was announced on May 22, 2021. The company spent a total of 2.69 billion yuan to repurchase 390 million shares. Zhang Xuansong’s shareholding increase plan was announced on June 3 and completed. People acting in concert increased their holdings of 150 million shares of the company through bidding transactions. At this time, Zhang Xuansong and people acting in concert held a total of 1.557 billion shares of Yonghui Supermarket, accounting for the total. 16.3% of share capital. As of June 3, the company’s repurchase and shareholding plan came to an end. At this time, the stock price had fallen from a high of 8.12 yuan before the repurchase to 5.58 yuan. As of the close on June 11, the company’s stock price closed at 5.32 yuan per share.

The stock price continues to decline, and many investors questioned the company’s chairman Zhang Xuansong’s behavior of “hands on each other” and “selling high and buying low” on the interactive platform. The question stems from the company’s announcement on the completion of an internal equity transfer plan announced on June 3rd. Due to family asset planning needs, Zhang Xuansong has internally transferred the 350 million shares he owns to persons acting in concert through a block transaction. , Namely Xishirun Herun private equity fund product. According to the company’s inquiry, the investor of Xishirun’s private equity fund products is Shanghai Xishirun Investment Management Co., Ltd., and the majority shareholder Han Chun, who holds 80% of the company’s shares, is also associated with a company called “Beijing Sequoia Yade Equity Investment Center (Limited) Partnership)” company (hereinafter referred to as “Beijing Sequoia Yade”), and Zhang Xuansong holds 1% of the shares of Beijing Sequoia Yade.

After the above-mentioned equity changes, the total shareholding ratio and number of Zhang Xuansong and the concerted person Xishirun Herun private equity fund products have not changed, while Zhang Xuansong’s own shareholding has dropped from 1.407 billion shares to 1.061 billion shares. It also dropped from 14.79% to 11.16%. In addition to the 150 million shares previously increased, Xishirun Herun Private Equity Fund products currently hold a total of 490 million shares of Yonghui Supermarket, accounting for 5.2%.

It is worth noting that according to the announcement made by Yonghui Supermarket on June 8, Zhang Xuansong intends to continue to increase his holdings of the company’s shares by 150 million yuan to 300 million yuan in the next six months. On June 9, Yonghui Supermarket closed up 0.33. %, it closed down 0.74% on June 10. Regarding whether the shareholding increase plan in the next 6 months will continue to be implemented by Xi Shirun Herun private equity fund products, which are acting in concert? “Investor Net” sent a letter to Yonghui Supermarket for verification, but no response was received. (Produced by Thinking Finance)■

Economic Observer reporter Liang Ji The criminal detention did not delay the reduction of holdings. This operation by Pan Xianwen, the actual controller of Sansheng Co., Ltd. (002742.SZ), has aroused widespread suspicion, including the supervisory authorities.

On the evening of June 6, Sansheng shares announced that its controlling shareholder and actual controller Pan Xianwen was taken criminal detention by the public security authorities on June 1 for being suspected of manipulating the securities market. It is worth noting that on June 2, Pan Xianwen reduced his holdings of 150,000 shares of the company; his son Pan Chenggong also reduced his holdings of company shares from May 31 to June 2.

Investors in the secondary market “fried the pot”: Why did they make an announcement only 5 days after being detained? Why can the share reduction operation be completed during the period of criminal detention?

On June 7, Sansheng shares opened the limit lower. The Shenzhen Stock Exchange hurriedly issued a letter of concern on the above-mentioned matters on the same day. Sansheng Co., Ltd. stated in its reply announcement on June 10 that the relevant information disclosure obligors did not violate the relevant regulations on timeliness, and the aforementioned reduction was caused by the forced liquidation of the pledged stocks of the parties.

In fact, since June 2020, Pan Xianwen, the actual controller of Sansheng Co., Ltd., and those acting in concert have entered the fast lane of shareholding reduction. At the same time, Pan Xianwen and those acting in concert also had a high percentage of pledged shares held by them, and they were forced to liquidate their positions by institutions many times.

Since 2019, Sansheng shares have included a total of 16 violations involving short-term transactions by supervisors, criminal detention of the actual controller, and investigations by the Securities Regulatory Commission for violations of the company’s letter disclosure. Sansheng also stated in the announcement that the company does have internal control problems such as the actual controller overriding internal control.

In addition to the criminal detention of the actual controller, Sansheng also disclosed on June 10 that some of the company’s shares held by the actual controllers Pan Xianwen and Zhou Tinge were frozen by the judicial system; in addition, it also announced the chairman and general manager on June 1. Due to Pan Chenggong’s triggering of the default clause agreed in the Zheshang Securities Agreement, the stock may be subject to the risk of forced liquidation again, and Sansheng shares are still facing uncertainty in the future.

The actual accused triggered three consecutive questions after being detained

On June 6, Sansheng announced that the company received a notice from the family of Pan Xianwen, the controlling shareholder and actual controller of the company, that Pan Xianwen was taken criminal detention by the Chongqing Public Security Bureau on June 1 for suspected manipulation of the securities market.

Outsiders questioned the five-day time difference between Pan Xianwen’s Xingwen’s detention and the announcement of Sansheng shares.

Prior to June 3, Sansheng shares announced that Pan Xianwen reduced his holdings of 150,000 shares of the company on June 2, the day after he was detained; Pan Chenggong also added up from May 31 to June 2. Reduced holdings of approximately 2,799,500 shares, including approximately 1,905,500 shares that were liquidated.

According to the 2021 quarterly report of Sansheng Shares, among the top 10 shareholders of the company, the largest shareholder Pan Xianwen and the second largest shareholder Zhou Ting’e are husband and wife and the actual controller of the company. The third largest shareholder Pan Chenggong is the son of the two; the sixth largest shareholder Pan Xiandong He is the younger brother of Pan Xianwen, and Zhou Tingguo, the seventh largest shareholder, is the younger brother of Zhou Ting’e; the above-mentioned five persons constitute connected relationships or persons acting in concert, with a total shareholding ratio of 54.87%. As a listed company with a “family business” color, Sansheng shares are not unexpectedly questioned by investors whether the family intends to delay time in order to “precisely reduce their holdings.”

On June 7, the Shenzhen Stock Exchange issued a letter of concern, throwing out “three consecutive questions”: whether Pan Xianwen’s compulsory criminal detention measures violated the timeliness of information disclosure; Pan Xianwen was detained, and Pan Chenggong’s decision to reduce holdings In the process, whether there is a situation of “precise reduction of holdings” using undisclosed information in relevant sensitive period transactions and constitutes insider trading; whether the actual controller and persons acting in concert, directors, supervisors, and relevant insider information insiders have insider trading.

Attorney Xu Feng from Shanghai Jiucheng Law Firm told reporters that according to Article 85 of the Criminal Procedure Law, the public security organs shall, within 24 hours after detention, except for circumstances that cannot be notified or may hinder investigations. The family members of the detainee shall be notified; and after the situation that hinders the investigation disappears, the family members of the detainee shall be notified immediately.

Sansheng shares stated in a reply letter issued on the 10th that Pan Xianwen’s wife Zhou Ting’e had obtained the detention notice on June 1. However, due to his “lack of understanding of the nature of the matter and legal significance, and unwilling to increase the psychological burden of relatives” Inform others; after consulting with a lawyer, he informed his son Pan Chenggong on the evening of June 3rd. As the chairman of the company, Pan Chenggong held a senior management meeting in the morning of June 4th (Friday) to inform relevant matters. Obtained on June 6th (Sunday) The notification document was submitted to the company’s securities department for information disclosure. The company believes that the relevant letter disclosure obligor does not violate the relevant regulations on timeliness.

The announcement also stated that the aforementioned reduction was caused by the securities companies’ voluntary liquidation of certain company stocks pledged by the parties to AVIC Securities and Zheshang Securities due to the triggering of the default clauses agreed in the agreement in the pledge special transaction unit. The self-dealing behavior of the securities firm that occurred due to the breach of contract is purely passive reduction of holdings for the parties concerned, and the amount involved is relatively small, and there is no “precise reduction of holdings” using undisclosed information and constitutes insider trading.

Sansheng shares also stated that the company’s current operating conditions are normal and the governance structure is stable. The company’s board of directors and management will ensure the normal operation of the company’s business activities and continue to promote the company’s sound development in accordance with the established strategy and business plan.

“The actual controller overrides the internal control”

The reason why Pan Xianwen is suspected of manipulating the securities market is not yet known. What is certain is that over the years, Pan Xianwen and those acting in concert have gradually fallen into a situation of pledged shares, occupied funds, and reduced their holdings.

Public information shows that Pan Xianwen served as the director of Chongqing Jiangbei Gypsum Plant and Jiangbei Special Building Materials Plant from 1995 to 2002. Jiangbei Special Materials (the predecessor of Sansheng Co., Ltd.) founded by him was established in May 2002 and restructured into a joint-stock company in March 2010. It started with the development and manufacturing of gypsum resources, focusing on concrete-based building materials business, and in 2015 Landed on the Shenzhen Stock Exchange in February. However, since 2016, Sansheng has started the cross-border pharmaceutical industry. In 2016, Sansheng Co., Ltd. spent 258 million yuan to acquire 100% of Baikang Pharmaceutical; in 2017, it again spent 538 million yuan to acquire 60% of Chunrui Pharmaceutical.

Sansheng shares were listed on February 17, 2015. Soon after, Pan Xianwen started its pledge. Multiple announcements show that as early as May 2017, the pledge ratio of Pan Xianwen’s shares has reached 94.56%; the quarterly report of 2021 shows that the pledge ratio of Pan Xianwen, Zhou Ting’e and Pan Chenggong reached 97.66%, 83.98% and 100%, respectively.

When the road to pledge financing almost hit the ceiling, Pan Xianwen began to occupy the funds of the listed company.

In March 2019, the Shenzhen Stock Exchange issued a letter of concern to Sansheng shares, requesting the latter to check whether its prepayment balance increased significantly compared with the beginning of 2018 whether it was related to the occupation of funds by related parties. Sansheng shares replied that the company did use its suppliers to pay approximately 449 million yuan in advance to Qingfeng Health, which is controlled by Pan Xianwen, which constituted a capital occupation by related parties. As of April 2019, Qingfeng Health has returned all the principal and interest of the occupied funds.

In September 2019, the Chongqing Securities Regulatory Bureau issued an “Administrative Penalty Decision”, giving Pan Xianwen a warning and fined 900,000 yuan; in addition, Sansheng and its senior executives were fined 30,000 to 900,000 yuan respectively. Sansheng shares once said that the company and related parties will learn lessons and take this as a warning to take concrete measures to prevent this kind of situation from happening again.

However, Sansheng’s funds were occupied by the actual controller twice afterwards. In 2020, Pan Xianwen and his controlling company occupied a total of 188 million yuan of funds of Sansheng Co., Ltd.; in the first quarter of 2021, Pan Xianwen and his controlling company occupied a total of 89.1 million yuan of funds of Sansheng Co., Ltd. For such matters, Sansheng’s 2020 annual report was issued by an accounting firm with an unqualified opinion with an emphasis on the matter.

Sansheng shares stated that the above-mentioned capital occupation is that the actual controller is above the internal control of the company and transfers the funds to the company controlled by the actual controller. The company has not fulfilled the decision-making process of the board of directors and the general meeting of shareholders. The relevant person in charge of the Ministry conducted an internal notification of criticism and fines.

The reporter noticed that in the 2020 internal control self-evaluation report issued by Sansheng on April 28, according to relevant standards, the company has the defect that the actual controller overrides the internal control, which causes the actual controller to pass the supplier And related parties as a capital channel to occupy the company’s non-operating funds.

Senior investment banker Wang Jiyue told the Economic Observer that the actual controllers of listed companies override internal control and illegal occupation of company funds. This is actually a stubborn illness in the securities market, and it is also a problem that the China Securities Regulatory Commission has been focusing on and monitoring. However, at the operational level, the frequent occurrence of such problems is not necessarily caused by the imperfection of the relevant system, but the implementation of the system needs to be carried out by people, but the actual controller often lacks supervision in the company, resulting in the failure of internal control. .

Pledge of equity and illegal appropriation of funds are unsustainable, and Pan Xianwen and those acting in concert have also embarked on the path of reduction.

At the end of June 2020, Sansheng shares announced that Pan Xianwen intends to reduce the company’s shares by no more than 25.92 million shares, and the proposed reduction will not exceed 6% of the company’s total share capital. The reason for the reduction is personal funding needs. At the end of July of the same year, Sansheng shares announced that Pan Xianwen planned to transfer 21.6 million shares of the company at a price of 138 million yuan, accounting for 5% of the company’s total share capital.

In March 2021, Sansheng shares once again disclosed the share reduction plan of Pan Xianwen and his concerted person Zhou Ting’e. The two men calculated that they would reduce their holdings by no more than 25.92 million shares, and the proposed reduction would not exceed 6% of the company’s total share capital.

On June 10, Sansheng shares announced that some of the company’s shares held by the actual controllers Pan Xianwen and Zhou Ting’e were judicially frozen on June 9, 2021. 3,273,800 shares.

Regarding the above matters, the reporter called Sansheng shares, but the other party said that the company is now in a sensitive period and refused to be interviewed by the media.

On June 7th, the share price of Sansheng shares fluctuated and consolidated after closing the limit at 4.62 yuan. It closed at 4.76 yuan on June 11, a 28.7% drop from the April high of 6.68 yuan.

Supervise the rain

In recent days, Pan Xianwen is not alone in the actual controller of a listed company that has been subject to criminal detention measures. On June 7, Hongda shares announced that the company received a letter from the controlling shareholder Hongda Industrial that the actual controller of the company, Liu Canglong, was taken criminal detention by the Chengdu Public Security Bureau on suspicion of breaching trust and using entrusted property. In addition, Fucheng shares, known as the “first funeral and funeral share” of A-shares, in fact, the controller Li Fucheng was investigated by the China Securities Regulatory Commission for suspected short-term trading; Shao Kai, the director and general manager of China Holding Co., Ltd., who had left his post only three days, was suspected Insider trading has also been investigated by the Securities Regulatory Commission.

A senior investment banker of a large Shanghai securities firm told the Economic Observer that if the actual controller of a listed company is subject to criminal detention and compulsory measures, it should be because the circumstances are bad and the amount involved is huge, and the criminal liability stipulated by the criminal law has been violated. At the level of administrative penalties imposed by the China Securities Regulatory Commission.

Wang Jiyue believes that the above phenomenon on the one hand shows that the supervision and law enforcement agencies are increasing their crackdowns on the illegal activities of listed companies. On the other hand, it also shows that the actual controllers of listed companies still have more violations of laws and regulations. Some may be the malicious behavior of deliberately hollowing out listed companies, and some may also be due to the limited channels for major shareholders to reduce their holdings in order to solve the debt crisis or capital chain problems to quench their thirst. In fact, the actual controller’s occupation of listed companies’ funds was once alleviated, but this round of high incidence, he believes that the restrictions on holdings reduction rules and the background of the overall financial system to reduce leverage are also important inducing factors.

Zhou Maohua, a financial analyst at China Everbright Bank, told reporters that, judging from some cases in recent years, it is true that some listed companies have insufficient internal management systems, insufficient internal governance, and internal executive restraint and supervision. Some listed companies have “insiders”. “Illegal behaviors that damage the legitimate rights and interests of shareholders and investors are not conducive to the long-term and healthy development of the company, and are incompatible with domestic high-quality development requirements. However, for listed companies, market financing channels are unobstructed and diversified, and violations of actual controllers are more inclined to lack of corporate internal governance and fundamental issues of company development.

Zhou Maohua said that in recent years, China has deepened financial supply-side reforms, accelerated the completion of legal shortcomings in the regulatory system, promoted the sound management system of listed companies, improved corporate governance, and promoted the high-quality development of listed companies. Strict supervision and tightening of financial institution policies are forcing listed companies to regulate their operations, strengthen their main businesses, improve quality and efficiency, and achieve high-quality development.

During the “two sessions” this year, a member of the Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference put forward the “Proposal on Further Improving and Clarifying the Scope of Legal Liability of Actual Controllers under Chinese Law to Increase Foreign Investment Confidence.” The China Securities Regulatory Commission stated that the next step will focus on continuing to cooperate with the legislature in making amendments, further improving the criminal liability provisions of the actual controller and cooperating with the revision of the “Company Law”, clarifying the actual controller’s fiduciary duty, and further improving the law on the actual controller. Responsibility regulations and other aspects were improved.

Wang Jiyue believes that the solution to such problems is that the annual audit accountant’s report and disclosure are required; the second is that if there is refinancing, the sponsor will focus on it; and the third is that local securities regulatory bureaus and exchanges will conduct routine inspections and concerns. Problems are found at multiple levels and punished promptly. However, he also said that it is still quite difficult to put an end to this situation.

The red dress with layered details, rhinestones, and late shoulders was accused of plagiarism by the Lebanese designer himself. Soudaiha said he was surprised when the evening dress he designed four years ago was copied. Andrea Meza’s dress model in the Miss Universe 2020 finale and Nadim Soudaiha’s design have many similarities. Photo: Angelopedia. “The international media discovered that the dress Miss Universe wore in the final night copied my design, but with a different color,” said designer Nadim Soudaiha. Based on the image, many beauty fans agree that the model of Miss Mexico’s dress has many similarities with the evening dress designed by Nadim Soudaiha since 2017. Previously, American singer Carrie Underwood used to wear this design. to be MC. Nadim Soudaiha said he was sad when a dress similar to his design appeared at a big contest but was not named. “If you look at the positive side, my designs go to far away places, are copied and worn on the big day. My feelings are mixed,” said the Lebanese-born designer. Earlier, designer Ivis Lenin said that Andrea Meza’s dress was made of tulle, hand-embroidered with 40,000 crystals, taking a year to complete. Meanwhile, the gold dress model was made by designer Nadim Soudaiha about 10 days, using Swarovski crystals. On the evening of May 16, Andrea Meza overcame many strong opponents and was crowned Miss Universe 2020. Previously, the 1.8 m tall beauty used to be the 1st runner-up of Miss World 2017.

However, while Hari Won is being praised for being more and more young and beautiful, Tran Thanh has clearly revealed an age footprint, even though he is 2 years younger than his wife. In particular, the latest selfie photo updated by the male MC on his personal page clearly shows wrinkles on his face, especially the eye area with large puffiness, making fans extremely confused. Tran Thanh shows a less attractive appearance than his wife. While Hari Won looks beautiful, sexy and full of vitality, Tran Thanh reappears with a frail, tired face. In the selfie posted on his personal page, Tran Thanh clearly revealed wrinkles on his face and big puffiness, making fans extremely confused. Just turned 34, but Tran Thanh has revealed an early age trace, even though he is 2 years younger than Hari Won. The image accidentally “denounces” the age sign on the face of the comedian. The eyes showing fatigue and the fake beard makeup for character shaping the male artist’s Godfather have received a lot of attention from people. Knowing that Tran Thanh’s appearance in the picture was partly affected by the make-up tool, but through his eyes, one can clearly see the emaciation in the male artist’s appearance. Witnessing the contrast in beauty between him and his beautiful wife, many fans couldn’t help but worry. Fans grieved to see that the male MC appeared many marks on his face. Before that, the beauty story of Hari Won and his husband Tran Thanh became a topic that strongly attracted the attention of people. In many times on the same frame, Hari Won defeats his husband by his youthful and vibrant appearance. From the face to the body of a beautiful woman, all have been significantly improved after getting married to Tran Thanh’s husband. Different from his wife, Tran Thanh recently is often said to be losing his dashing appearance when he often reveals his radiant body, fat belly and a tired face due to busy work. That made many Tran Thanh fans worried, leaving words of encouragement so that he could spend more time taking care of himself. Not only to look better when appearing with his wife Hari Won, Tran Thanh’s care for his appearance also helps him preserve his handsome image, scoring absolute points in the eyes of people. Hari Won shows an increasingly beautiful and attractive appearance thanks to investment, taking care not only his face but also his physique. Although 2 years younger than Hari Won, but Tran Thanh shows signs of age earlier than his wife. Many people commented that, after getting married, Tran Thanh did not stop gaining weight. So, not only women, men also need to spend time taking care of their own appearance in order to have a well-groomed, eye-catching look. Specifically, below are notes that guys must know to maintain the best image in the eyes of their lover / partner. Don’t forget to take care of your face To get a standard eye-catching look, do not forget to pay attention to skin care. No need to be as fussy as women, boys can shorten skin care steps, namely cleansing, moisturizing and sun protection. These are 3 basic skin care steps, helping the skin to avoid the dangers of dark, rough, dull, acne-prone skin … Don’t forget to take care of your skin, guys. Always cut your hair, shave neatly “The tooth of the hair is the angle of the person”, this statement is true not only for women but also for men. Therefore, the boys remember to always cut their hair and shave neatly. A hair that is too long, flaring will create a feeling of being messy and lacking in appearance. Also, letting the beard grow stubbornly also makes the image of the boys become old and less attractive. Not to mention, growing beard also creates opportunities for dirt and bacteria to develop on the skin, especially in monsoon tropical climates like in Vietnam. The neat hair helps the boys score perfect. Exercise regularly to maintain a fit body Building a regular sports routine not only helps to maintain a good body shape, but also enhances strength as well as health. Especially for men, a well-proportioned and muscular body will help complete a more attractive image when facing the opposite sex. Therefore, the boys do not forget to build a regular and reasonable training regime. Sports like gym, boxing, cycling, tennis will be the perfect suggestion. Sports exercise helps strengthen the men, get a firm, healthy body. Eat and drink in moderation, limit alcohol use An uncontrolled, unscientific diet can easily cause negative effects on both your health and your physique. However, not all guys notice that. So from today, pay a little more attention to your diet, limit your intake of high-fat fried foods, sweets, and include more green vegetables, fruits and foods high in protein, and low in fat. daily ration. In addition, limit the use of alcohol, because they are also considered the number 1 enemy for the physique and health of the user. Using too much alcohol will easily lead to abdominal obesity and many other diseases.

Currently, “Cocoon em” is in the process of completing the product but suddenly gets caught up in the controversy from the fan community who loves beauty pageants. In addition to some comments that “Coc em” has “plagiarized” the national costume of Miss Myanmar, although the design of “Coc em” was released first, there are also some comments saying, “Coc I “only use pure white, if I step onto the stage, will Miss Universe be blurred compared to your country?” Before the conflicting opinions surrounding his design, designer Khoa Lo officially responded. In a conversation with VOV reporter, the male designer said, “If the cocoon is square, then Khoa is ready to do it. Just kidding, the overall look of the outfit was Khoa’s inspired by the image of Cap. Yin, from which the idea of ​​’the cocoon opened’ was born. Khoa did not think much about the commotion of the social network, Khoa also felt surprised by this coincidence “. Designer Khoa Lo Sharing about the overall product, Khoa Lo said, “Cocooning is a big story in Khoa’s mind from his trip to Tan Chau Silk Village. The design contest took place and Khoa did not hesitate to show off. This idea, especially for an ethnic costume. Silk weaves a ao dai “. Besides, he took about 4 months to perfect this product. “The whole work applies the art of hand-woven stringing and binding, with white tones, so all stages must be meticulous and careful. Up to now, Khoa has spent 4 months to improve and edit so that ‘Coc em’ will make Khanh Van the most confident. Khoa feels satisfied with his work.If not satisfied, Khoa will not dare to submit the test. If there is any editing, it is essential and best for Khanh Van and ‘Coc em’ to shine at Miss Universe “- Khoa Lo expressed. He said that the highlight of “Cocoon” will be Miss Khanh Van because the beautiful national costume not only honors the Vietnamese soul but also honors the beauty of Vietnamese people. At the same time, this young designer revealed, “In order for Miss Khanh Van to confidently wear the ‘Cocoon’ outfit on the international stage, Khoa has prepared very carefully from the manipulation and order of dress assembly, the way posing as well as suggestions for Van to fully express the meaning of this outfit “. Finally, Khoa Lo emphasized, “Khoa greatly appreciates and loves the values ​​that nature offers, the story of silkworms spreading silk to turn into silk, weaving the shirt through the Vietnamese industry has inspired Khoa very much. Khoa hopes that ‘Cocoon em’ will convey the story and quintessence of Vietnam “. Khoa Lu and “Cocoon em”

However, the success of this person is not immune from scandals. MrBeast is accused of creating a hazardous work environment for employees. Photo: @mrbeast. In 2018, The Atlantic discovered that Jimmy’s old series of tweets contained obscene, mocking content aimed at homosexuals. In a video released in November 2019, the person was also accused of charity with counterfeit money, according to Dexerto . Jimmy then explained that he gave counterfeit money while filming to minimize the danger, avoid many people rushing to ask for free money. Last April, Jimmy faced a wave of outrage from fans – who lost significant amounts of money into a stream of cryptocurrency he promoted. A month later, 11 employees who used to work under Jimmy told New York Times that their former boss created a “hostile work environment”, based on bias and made “many unreasonable requests”. They affirmed this guy’s demeanor “immediately changed as soon as he left the camera”. Matt Turner (20 years old), the editor working for Jimmy from February 2018 to September 2019, said Jimmy cursed at him almost every day. He is also often referred to by Jimmy with phrases used to offend people with intellectual disabilities. Nate Anderson (22 years old), who only lasted a week working with Jimmy, admits his former boss is too perfectionist and “nobody can follow”. Jimmy vowed not to retire, pursuing this job for life. Photo: MrBeast / Twitter. After posting a video about his bad experiences while working with Jimmy, Nate quickly received a series of indignant comments, even death threats, from the fan community of the other net star. Many of them are just children. “Those kids don’t even know what they’re talking about. They just don’t want to see their idols fall, ”Matt, who is in the same situation as Nate, shared with New York Times . The Business Insider Jimmy is known for his mischiefs like reading every word in a dictionary, turning his backyard into a ball pool, buying everything in the store, even giving strangers $ 1 million but giving them only 1 minute to spend. use it. In January 2017, Jimmy became famous after posting a video counting from 1-100,000. After that breakthrough, this person produced a series of products with content similar to playing fidget spinner for 24 hours or watching MV. It’s Everyday Bro by Jake Paul for 10 hours straight. Due to regular vlogging to give random money to waitresses, taxi drivers and novice streamer, Jimmy is called a “generous philanthropist” by fans. In reality, however, much of this money is funded by brands, according to New York Times.

The above report was made by Capgemini for KPN, one of the largest telecommunications networks in the Netherlands, in 2010. This report was later published by De Volkskrant . Although KPN acknowledged the existence of the report, the company stated on April 19 that it “had never seen Huawei steal customer information”. This telecommunication network also affirmed that none of their partners “have the ability to access illegally or have unlimited control over the system of KPN”. Huawei also denied that: “We have never been accused of illegal acts by the government”. Huawei is one of the telecommunications equipment suppliers that have suffered the most information theft charges in Europe. Photo: Shutterstock. KPN started using Huawei’s technology in 2009. After AIVD, the Dutch domestic intelligence agency, warned of the possibility of being eavesdropped, the KPN commissioned the report. The report concludes that users of KPN “can lose confidence” in this telecommunications network “if they know that the Chinese government can monitor calls of KPN mobile numbers”. Even after receiving reports from Capgemini, KPN continued to buy technical equipment to establish Huawei’s 3G and 4G networks, according to Guardian . However, by 2020, KPN becomes one of the first telecommunications companies in Europe to exclude Huawei from its 5G network development program. Instead, KPN chose Ericsson from Sweden to coordinate the construction of its 5G network. Meanwhile, the Dutch government is also tightening regulations on telecommunications equipment suppliers, including background checks on employees with access to the network.

Former Minister Vu Huy Hoang denied the blame on his subordinates Responding to the Panel’s question, the reason for having autographs signed by former Deputy Minister Ho Thi Kim Thoa, the defendant Vu Huy Hoang said that the Ministry of Industry and Trade has a working regulation, specifying each field and each consensus. director in charge. When handling related cases, the person in charge directly responsible, in case the person in charge is absent, can consult with the leader to handle it instead. “Although the assigned people take initiative in their field, if they consider it necessary to consult with members of the board of directors and leaders like me, they actively consult with me. I can only consult when I am. I was asked to attend. Likewise, in important meetings, the person in charge who is away can ask someone else to hold the meeting. “ , the defendant Vu Huy Hoang explained. Former Minister of Industry and Trade Vu Huy Hoang and his accomplices in court. (Photo: VNA) In court, the former Minister of Industry and Trade also denied that he blamed his subordinates. “I apologize to VKS, reading the indictment this morning saying that I do not accept responsibility within my scope, I reaffirm before the Panel, I have no opinion to blame, blame other individuals for the What is happening if I am the person directly in charge. I am personally responsible for the things I am in charge of, directing and being consulted. for others, including subordinates “ , the defendant Vu Huy Hoang explained. Talking about the responsibility for the damage to the State property, the defendant Vu Huy Hoang still affirmed that, according to the regulations, the head is responsible for general but the tasks are clearly assigned to each leader. “Me and the other members are in general management, can not find out. The enterprise is proactive in production and business, Sabeco has been equitized, the management is through the assistant department. Today after listening to the news. believe, I see this project is not an important work of the Ministry, not to say of the State, the Minister cannot grasp all “, Mr. Hoang presented. “Golden land” falls into private hands because the Ministry of Industry and Trade pressured? In this case, Mr. Phan Dang Tuat, former Chairman of the Board of Directors, State Capital Management Board for the period 2012-2015, signed a number of investor selection documents. Mr. Tuat was not examined for penal liability and attended the trial as a person with related rights and obligations. Previously, in 2007, Sabeco cooperated with Sabeco Land to implement the project at 2-4-6 Hai Ba Trung (District 1, Ho Chi Minh City), but it was not financial enough because the amount of land use fee was 1,236 billion. copper. Although in 2012, the Government issued a Resolution 26 on divestment from outside the industry, but Mr. Vu Huy Hoang (former Minister of Industry and Trade), Ho Thi Kim Thoa (former Deputy Minister of Industry and Trade, was in hiding) continued to direct Sabeco invests in real estate projects. On April 23, 2014, Sabeco issued official dispatch No. 10 proposing for Sabeco to implement the project with a group of new investors to establish Sabeco Pearl, Sabeco also transferred the above land use right to Sabeco Pearl. In the process of implementing mistakes, Sabeco divested cheap capital, leading to gold land falling into private hands, the state suffered more than 2,700 billion VND losses. In response to the panel, Mr. Tuat admitted that Sabeco is the only corporation known as rich but has no office and has to hire. Rent is also budgetary. Sabeco considers its responsibility to quickly get an office. When Sabeco Land withdrew from the 2-4-6 Hai Ba Trung project, new investors were excited. Mr. Tuat signed the official letter No. 10 with reference to other companies in the industry and trade. After the approval of the Ministry of Industry and Trade, Sabeco meets with investors, drafting the contract. “I only attended the first time when the parties greeted each other, then discussed the implementation of the contract, conditions, terms … The negotiation of the project is based on the old project” Mr. Tuan said. Referring to the document sent to the People’s Committee of Ho Chi Minh City to agree to Sabeco Pear to fulfill financial obligations, Mr. Tuat said that after completing the dossier with the investor, Sabeco made a joint venture cooperation contract and submitted it to the People’s Committee for project implementation. Mr. Tuat admitted that signing the official letter was not authorized because at that time, the legal representative was absent. “Sabeco submitted the application but more than a month later, there is no reply. The Ministry of Industry and Trade urged us to quickly implement the project … “ Mr. Tuat explained. Mr. Tuat added: “In Sabeco it is customary to just go to meetings about land and call me. All the city documents sent to Sabeco on land are sent to me, I attend ”. Mr. Tuat also said that before issuing an official letter to Sabeco Pear to fulfill its financial obligations, Sabeco had to report to the Ministry of Industry and Trade. In response to the judge’s questions about his responsibilities related to the case, Mr. Tuat replied: “I think in the process of working, the only mistake is being too aggressive and enthusiastic. Should have waited time. Because the Ministry of Industry and Trade pressured. The Ministry also urged the late payment fines of 18.5 billion each year. After 1 month of submitting the application, we did not respond, we were in a hurry… ”. Present at the court, the representative of Me Linh Square Joint Stock Company (formerly Sabeco Pearl) said that the unit is currently managing the “golden land” above. Shareholders participating in the company since April 2017 have not been prosecuted for the case for less than 1 year, since then the land has been vacant, not deployed, causing great damage to the company. “We consider the records, all documents of the state are true, true, we believe in them. When we attended court, it was discovered that there were many incidents happening between different regulatory agencies, not related to us. Ask the court to look and protect our rights ” This taste added.

This customer said he bought a portion of rib porridge at store H in Luong Su C alley (Van Chuong, Dong Da, Hanoi). However, when he was experiencing the ribs porridge, he was extremely horrified when he ate almost the entire serving of rib porridge, when he discovered that there were maggots in the ribs while crawling. The shared image of diners on social networks made many people “goosebumps”. The post shared: “I ate more than half of the porridge before eating the ribs, when I was gleefully peeling the ribs, I saw the ribs inside this” creature “. It was so terrible that we threw up all. I still feel scared until now. I really don’t understand which source they use to sell. I decided to post to warn everyone carefully because I still see friends for some silver coins that seeding for nonsense businesses like this, sometimes your loved ones eat into harm’s health, poisoning. Do you guys regret it? … “. A close-up of maggots as they crawled out of the ribs. Observed with the naked eye on the clip, there are many white, small-sized strange creatures creeping into the crevices of the ribs and crawling around the ribs. The image made many people scare to watch it again because it was too haunted. The above image has received many comments and harsh criticism about the lack of hygiene in this porridge shop. Talking to PV, Ms. H confirmed that she has never received any feedback from customers. On the afternoon of April 7, to verify the above information, Reporter Family & Social Affairs followed the information on the clip and had an exchange with Mrs. NLH (52 years old) – the owner of rib porridge shop at Luong Su C lane. Accordingly, when receiving information from the reporter, Ms. H was completely surprised about the incident at the shop and affirmed that she did not know the above images, nor did she receive any negative information. What negative light about ribs porridge that Ms. H is doing business. According to Ms. H, her rib porridge shop has existed for many years, selling about 6 pots of rib porridge a day. According to Ms. H, every day, Ms. H cooks 6 pots of rib porridge and sells it from noon to 22:00 at night. Ms. H said: “I have been selling a family heirloom porridge from my mother for nearly 30 years. The porridge pot has been my whole life’s passion and every day I import ingredients from a reputable base. I salted and cooked with firewood for more than 2 hours before being put in the porridge pot. I don’t understand why the maggots are in the ribs for a long and high temperature. According to Ms. H, every day, Ms. H cooks 6 pots of rib porridge and sells it from noon to 22:00 at night. Mrs. H frankly: “Hearing what happened at my restaurant, even though I did not receive any feedback from customers, I was very sad and surprised. If there is any problem, please advise me, but for years My shop is very crowded with customers. (According to GiadinhNet)

Internet photo

Losing money for many years

Vietnam Industrial Construction Joint Stock Corporation (Vinaincon, VVN code – UPCoM transaction) was established in 1998, with charter capital of 550 billion VND, and 82.75% of state capital represented by the Ministry of Industry and Trade. The company specializes in construction and installation, basic construction.

The audited financial statements of the parent company 2020 have just been announced by VVN, showing that the total assets of the company is 987 billion VND. Revenue from goods sold and service provision in 2020 will reach 313 billion VND but COGS is 314 billion VND, so gross profit is negative 724 million VND.

Revenue from financial activities is 48.4 billion VND. The cost of business management is 30 billion. Net profit reached 9.3 billion. Thereby, after-tax profit reached 13.2 billion.

According to the note, the revenue from financial activities mainly comes from deposit interest, interest of 18.4 billion dong, and dividend of 29.9 billion dong.

It is known that VVN invests in many subsidiaries and associates. These companies are mostly profitable, the highest profit is from Thu Duc Centrifugal Concrete JSC (13 billion VND) and An Giang Centrifugal Joint Stock Company (6.1 billion VND).

Up to this point, VVN has not yet released its 2020 consolidated financial statements. In early April 2021, VVN also submitted a request to extend the time to hold the 2021 Annual General Meeting of Shareholders for the reason that results were summarized. The Corporation’s production and business have not been completed yet because the work-in-progress valuation and debt comparison with the investors are difficult and prolonged.

According to the annual report of 2019, although the total revenue and other income in 2019 increased by 126.7% compared to 2018, reaching more than 4,443 billion VND, but the cost of goods sold was high. In addition, the investment from Quang Son Cement Company Limited lost a loss (minus 126 billion VND), making the company’s profit in 2018 and 2019 all negative numbers.

In 2020, the company has a decision to dismiss Mr. Hoang Chi Cuong – General Director, instead appointing Mr. Do Chi Nguyen.

Please clarify the role of Vinaincon

From April 12, Hanoi City People’s Court brought to trial with 19 defendants who are leaders of Vietnam Steel Corporation – VNS, Thai Nguyen Iron and Steel Joint Stock Company – TISCO on wrongdoing in this project with behavior like Adjusting the investment structure, signing the contract appendix, separating part c from the EPC contract, signing subcontracting contract with Vinaincon according to unit price, leading to breaking the EPC contract principles …

Vinaincon is a subcontractor involved in Thai Nguyen Iron and Steel Phase 2 project. In 2009, the EPC contract between Thai Nguyen Iron and Steel Joint Stock Company – TISCO and Chinese contractor MCC had problems due to consecutive MCC. contract breaking.

On April 29, 2009, Vinaincon sent a document to the Ministry of Industry and Trade, Vietnam Steel Corporation – VNS (granting investment decision) and TISCO to register as a subcontractor.

On May 14, 2009, on the basis of the request of Vinaincon, the Ministry of Industry and Trade sent a document 4320 to VNS, TISCO with the content that the Ministry of Industry and Trade commented, “Vinaincon is a capable and experienced unit in the field. construction and installation of industrial construction works. Request VNS, TISCO to consider and approve Vinaincon to be the subcontractor to perform Part C ”.

On June 26, 2009, Mr. Mai Van Tinh – former Chairman of the Board of Directors of VNS signed a written agreement to allow Vinaincon to be a subcontractor. After that, TISCO, Vinaincon and MCC signed the contract.

However, in 2010, Vinaincon returned his job to TISCO due to insufficient capacity. TISCO had to subcontract with 13 other companies, but the project was still incomplete, capitalized and caused a loss of more than VND 830 billion to the state.

Some defendants admitted that they accepted Vinaincon because of the above document from the Ministry of Industry and Trade.

Defending defendant Tran Trong Mung (former General Director of TISCO), lawyer Truong Anh Tu said that in the conclusion of the project, the Government Inspector has determined that the Ministry of Industry and Trade has introduced and proposed VNS, TISCO to accept It is not the right authority for Vinaincon to be a subcontractor.

Lawyer Nguyen Thi Minh Yen, defending defendant Dong Quang Duong (former deputy director of TISCO), stated that: TISCO’s approval of Vinainco as a subcontractor for MCC must first mention the responsibility of the Ministry of Industry and Trade in the issue of introducing Vinainco and confirming Vinainco’s capacity to lead to a tripartite contract between TISCO – MCC and Vinaincon. Next, the fact that Vinainco voluntarily stopped implementing part c was due to the subjectivity of Vinaincon.

Therefore, the lawyer proposed to return the file to investigate and review the responsibility of the Ministry of Industry and Trade; Collect documents and evidence of Vinaincon’s performance of the contract, clarify how Vinaincon appoints 13 subcontractors? …

Armored tank force of the Polish army – illustrations documentary.

On April 16, Russian media reported that a Polish army-level officer announced Russia’s “plan of aggression” against European countries.

The Topwar site said this was “another attack on Russia from Poland”. Earlier, a series of media in Ukraine had reported that the Polish army accused the Russian army of “aggression” that Moscow was “a threat” to a safe and stable Europe.

“The West’s hysteria over the maneuvering of Russian troops, believed to be on the Ukrainian border, has yet to stop.

The Commander of the Operations Command of the Polish Armed Forces, General Tomasz Piotrowski, has been involved in accusing Russia of “aggression”.

Mr. Tomasz Piotrowski was the one who announced Moscow’s “aggression plans” concerning Europe “safe” and promised to support the Ukrainian Armed Forces “- Topwar wrote.

According to the Ukrainian press, General Tomasz Piotrowski made such a promise in a telephone conversation with the Commander of the Ukrainian Armed Forces Unification Force, Sergei Naev.

Polish army – documentary photo.

During the phone call, the Ukrainian general informed the Polish side of the current situation at the border with Russia, and also talked about the measures taken by the Ukrainian Armed Forces to “not allow the Russian army to enter. to be European ”.

According to the Ukrainian commanding officer, Kiev is considering a number of options for the development of the situation and has been fully prepared to “contain the enemy.”

In response, Polish General Tomasz Piotrowski expressed his support as well as the Minister of Defense and the President of Poland for Kiev. Mr. Tomasz Piotrowski promised to continue assisting Ukraine on the path of joining NATO.

Earlier, according to Topwar, many people may have expressed support for Kiev over the background of the “Russian threat”.

But, all was just words, for no one would fight for Ukraine, not Poland “against Russia”, nor the “free republics” of the Baltic states, nor the United States. together with NATO will directly do as promised.

“Yes, you can do it at least ten times a day. Poland can also supply weapons. But no one has the desire to send his army to the Donbass battlefield “- the Russian newspaper sarcasm.

Opening the argument, lawyer Dinh Anh Tuan, defending defendant Tran Trong Mung (former General Director of TISCO) said that in this case, the procedural agency should consider the responsibility of the Ministry of Industry and Trade. Vietnam Industrial Construction Corporation (VINAINCON) to defendants who are leaders of TISCO and leaders of Vietnam Steel Corporation (VNS) so that they choose VINAINCON as a subcontractor.

The defendants at the trial.

According to the defense lawyer, one of the reasons why the leaders of TISCO and leaders of VNS accepted VINAINCON because there is a document signed by the Ministry of Industry and Trade signed by a leader of the ministry. Documents of the Ministry of Industry and Trade show that VINAINCON is an enterprise of the ministry with good capacity. According to lawyer Tuan, in this incident, the main responsibility belongs to the Ministry of Industry and Trade. TISCO and VNS only have to bear joint responsibility.

During the impeachment process, the representative of the Procuracy determined that the defendant Tran Trong Mung was responsible for the case when he did not terminate the contract with China Metallurgical Science, Technology and Trade Corporation (MCC), although the This industry has violated. Specifically, in 2007, TISCO and MCC signed a package EPC contract, costing 160 million USD to build a metallurgical line. MCC then violated the contract, did not build and demanded a price increase.

The Procuracy said that, at that time, defendant Mung must terminate the contract with MCC, withdraw the advance, report to the authorized person to cancel the bid and re-bid in accordance with the law. . However, the defendant Mung instructed to negotiate at the request of MCC, and at the same time signed a written request to increase the price of part C (construction and installation) in the EPC Contract.

In addition, the defendant Mung also introduced and accepted VINAINCON as a subcontractor. Because VINAINCON is not capable enough, in 2011 the project had to stop construction, so far the project has not been completed.

The defense lawyers at the trial.

Debating about TISCO not stopping the contract with MCC, lawyer Tuan cited many legal documents, the defendant Mung signed many documents urging MCC to implement the project. Defendant Mung also signed a document to the Ministry of Industry and Trade and VNS with the content “Request the Ministry of Industry and Trade to report to the Government for permission to terminate the EPC contract with the MCC contractor. Require MCC to return the deposit and reimburse damages ”. But this is not accepted by the authorities.

Under the EPC Contract, if there is a dispute, TISCO and MCC will settle in an arbitration court in Singapore. Therefore, TISCO signed a contract with Kenvil Chia law firm of this island nation to advise and received a reply with the content “The termination of the contract cannot be taken lightly and should only consider the termination if there are no more options. choose another one ”.

Since then, the defendant Mung chose to continue the contract, change the price of construction and installation and change the price of the EPC contract according to the provisions of Circular 09/2008 of the Ministry of Construction.

Also according to lawyer Tuan, the change in the form of part C contract from package to unit price contract was not given by defendant Mung. Even the defendant Mung once opposed this because the change in unit price is that the next quarter’s price is higher than the previous quarter, causing the project to raise the price, the contractor is not actively working.

Lawyer Tuan said that his client, the defendant Mung has only part of the responsibility in introducing VINAINCON as a subcontractor, so he asked the Panel to transfer the charge to the defendant Mung from the crime of “Violation of regulations on management. and the use of State property causes loss and waste “to the crime of” Lack of responsibility, causing serious consequences “.

Lawyer Tran Van Tao, defending defendant Tran Van Kham (former Chairman of the Board of Directors cum General Director of TISCO) who is the successor to the defendant Tran Trong Mung said that the impeachment view of the representative of the Procuracy towards the body. His boss is too heavy. Lawyer Tao acknowledged that all the acts of defendant Kham were just for the purpose of expecting the project to be completed soon.

According to Tao, defendant Khâm received the project when the project had been implemented for 24 months with MCC general contractor not under construction. The project was also asked for permission by the defendant and the Ministry of Industry and Trade, the Government allowed to separate part C assigned to VINAINCON for construction and increase the investment for part C. Therefore, the Procuracy said, the defendant Khâm’s actions to prolong the performance of the contract, increase the contract price, separate Part C from the contract, agree that VINAINCON is incapable of performing the contract is incorrect.

The representative of the Procuracy exercises prosecution rights at the trial.

During the impeachment process, the representative of the Procuracy determined that defendant Khâm has the role of organizing the offense. With his powers as Chairman of the Board of Directors cum General Director of TISCO, as the successor to the defendant Mung directing the project implementation, defendant Kham knows that the EPC contract is a package contract, without grounds for price adjustment, but still directs to advise, propose and sign the decision to adjust the total project investment structure, including the provision for part C of the Contract to increase by 15.57 million USD.

Defendant Kham also signed the fourth adjustment annex with MCC agreed to separate Part C from the contract, at the same time signed a three-party subcontract, agreed to assign incompetent VINAINCON and other real subcontractors. Part C is in the form of an adjustable unit price contract, TISCO organizes the implementation and assumes all risks without a legal basis, not in accordance with the provisions of the contract.

Ministry of Industry and Trade is responsible?

In court, the defendants have the right to argue before the prosecution’s allegations that they are responsible for the VND 830 billion loss case at the Thai Nguyen Iron and Steel Phase 2 Production Expansion Project (TISCO).

Defendant Tran Trong Mung, former General Director of TISCO, was the first to have the right to argue, but asked lawyer Dinh Anh Tuan to defend himself. Previously, defendant Mung was offered a penalty of 10-11 years in prison by the Procuracy because he was accused of having the main responsibility in the case when he did not terminate his contract with China Metallurgical Science, Technology and Trade Group (MCC) even though this business has violated.

Project of production expansion phase 2 of Thai Nguyen Iron and Steel Company stopped construction for many years. Photo: GENERAL WRITE

The proceeding agency said that the defendant should Mung must terminate the contract with MCC, withdraw the advance; report to the authorized person to cancel the bid or to re-bid. However, he directed to negotiate at the request of MCC; sign a written request for price increase of part C (construction and installation) in the EPC contract of the project.

The Procuracy also accused Mung of introducing and accepting the Vietnam Industrial Construction Corporation (VINAINCON) as a subcontractor. Since then, VINAINCON is not qualified, so in 2011, construction has stopped, making the project unfinished so far.

Defending defendant Tran Trong Mung, lawyer Dinh Anh Tuan said that it is necessary to consider the responsibility of the Ministry of Industry and Trade when introducing VINAINCON to the defendants in the case so that they can choose to be subcontractors.

According to lawyer Dinh Anh Tuan, the main responsibility in introducing VINAINCON must belong to the Ministry of Industry and Trade; TISCO and Vietnam Steel Corporation – VNS are only liable for joint responsibility.

Lawyer Dinh Anh Tuan also said that his client only has a part of responsibility in introducing VINAINCON as a subcontractor, so he asked the court to transfer the crime from “Violation of regulations on the management and use of property. water causes loss and waste “to” Lack of responsibility, causing serious consequences “.

Regarding the alleged loss of VND 830 billion, VINAINCON was approved as a subcontractor, the defendants are former leaders at TISCO and VNS declared, they accepted because there was a document signed by the Ministry of Industry and Trade signed by a Deputy Minister. In the document, the Ministry of Industry and Trade said that VINAINCON is an enterprise of the Ministry with good capacity.

“Choose VINAINCON because according to experience”

Before that, in the questioning section, judge Truong Viet Toan asked VINAINCON’s representative, Mr. Hoang Chi Cuong (at the time of project implementation, VINAINCON’s General Director) to clarify the capacity of this business when being introduced to a subcontractor in the EPC contract.

Judge Truong Viet Toan asked Mr. Hoang Chi Cuong to confirm that at the time the bid received the requested documents from MCC and TISCO?

Mr. Hoang Chi Cuong affirmed that he has not received any documents yet.

Seeing “unreasonable”, because there is no request dossier in the bid, but VINAINCON is a subcontractor, judge Truong Viet Toan asked: “Without the request, on what basis for VINAINCON to respond. Asked to bid? ”

Mr. Hoang Chi Cuong said that this is just the selection of subcontractors of MCC, this is not the bidding document!

2 representatives of VINAINCON presented in court. Photo: DO TRUNG

Explaining to the representative of VINAINCON, judge Truong Viet Toan said that the selection of a contractor is also a form of bidding in the Bidding Law, in which the Bidding Law governs; the only difference is that public bidding or appointment of contractor, appointment of contractor is also a form of bidding.

“In the EPC contract, the general contractor MCC has the right to select the contractor according to the method of bidding or contractor appointment. Also in the same contract, the provisions of the contractor’s responsibility depend on the MCC; MCC selects subcontractors on the basis of bidding or contractor appointment. Bidding or appointment of contractors is ultimately regulated in the Bidding Law. Bid preparation will include requirements documents, in which the project owner will require to do what works, how economic and technical efficiency, progress on time, construction design, evaluation of works. What is the project’s environmental impact? Perhaps you do not understand what the required documents are, “said judge Truong Viet Toan.

According to Judge Truong Viet Toan, the selection of contractors, appointment contractors or tenders are all governed by the Bidding Law; In the initial steps, there are bids, in the bidding documents there are requirements.

“I asked to see how the pressure is. Because all the defendants at TISCO declared the selection of VINAINCON, this is an incompetent and inexperienced unit. And based on that dossier of request, how VINAINCON responded according to the required dossier, to see if it is true or not, ”said judge Truong Viet Toan.

Meanwhile, Mr. Hoang Chi Cuong continues to affirm that his business is a subcontractor and has never received the required documents from TISCO and MCC.

Judge Truong Viet Toan continued to prosecute: “So on what basis to sign a three-party contract?”

“Signing a 3-party contract on the basis of the capacity and experience of VINAINCON for the previous works done”, said representative of VINAINCON.

Judge Truong Viet Toan interrupted: “But, in reality, there are things that cannot be empiricist. How do you see the specific capabilities of VINAINCON in this project? “

Please be presented more, Mr. Hoang Chi Cuong said that VINAINCON has done many great projects since the 1960s, such as Apatite Lao Cai, participated in the construction of Thai Nguyen Iron and Steel Area from the beginning, Supe Lam Thao, steel, hydropower …

“Those are achievements, this is not a meeting to raise achievements and reward for emulation”, judge Truong Viet Toan asked Mr. Cuong to focus on the question …

Today (April 15), the People’s Court of Ba Ria – Vung Tau province brought the case of “fraudulent appropriation of property” occurred at Sao Vang Investment Joint Stock Company (referred to as Sao Vang company for short, address number 257). Ba Cu, Ward 4, Vung Tau City) to trial. This is a fraud case with the amount of hundreds of billion dong.

In court, the defendant Pham Thi Thu Ha (SN 1983, hometown of Ha Tinh, residing in Vung Tau City) was prosecuted by VKSND of the same level for fraudulent appropriation of property.

Concerning this case, the mastermind – defendant Huynh Thi Ngan Trang (SN 1983, resident of Xuan Loc district, Dong Nai province) has fled and is being wanted.

Defendant Pham Thi Thu Ha at the trial this morning (April 15). Photo: Quang Hung

From the early morning, hundreds of people who were the victims, who were involved in the case have been in court, crowded in the hall and the railing outside the courtroom.

Some victims also brought law books to prepare for the argument in court.

However, after the examination of the composition of the court, the Panel decided to postpone the trial for the reasons: many victims are absent, the person with related obligations and the victim requested the postponement … , delay after more than 1 month, will be reopened.

According to the list announced by the secretary, this trial the court summoned more than 144 victims and more than 400 people with related obligations. However, only more than 100 victims were present and more than 134 persons with related rights and obligations participated.

After the decision to postpone the trial, many defendants petitioned to send the People’s Court to return the files to further investigate the case, they said that the procedural agency had “overlooked” the crime, many related issues in the case. the judgment has not been satisfactorily resolved …

Appropriated nearly 224 billion dong of 433 customers

According to the case file, from 2012 to June 2017, Huynh Thi Ngan Trang – Chairman of Sao Vang and Pham Thi Thu Ha – held the positions: Director, Deputy General Director, The treasurer of Sao Vang Company deceived 433 customers to steal nearly 224 billion dong.

Trang and Ha confessed that during the above period, Sao Vang company invested in projects, bought shares at a loss, had no revenue, but both still maintained to pay profits to customers, taking money from the customer pays the customer, the latter pays the first.

Hundreds of people were harmed, who were on duty involved in court early in the morning. Photo: Quang Hung

Many participants in court leave the courtroom after the decision to postpone. Photo: Quang Hung

In December 2016, Sao Vang Company terminated the investment activities of projects, but continued to mobilize capital from customers for investment cooperation. By June 2017, although Sao Vang Company could not afford to pay, Trang continued to deceive customers through the service staff, customer department to appeal and entice customers by offer a profit rate of 22-30% for them to deposit money into the company and then appropriate a portion of paying for previous customers.

In order to carry out the above behavior, Trang and Ha have made false documents on the charter capital contribution of member companies in cash; taking advantage of the position of General Director, concurrently Chairman of the Board of Directors, Trang instructs employees to spend money for the “virtual” project investment page, no revenue.

After that, Trang pays a certain amount of money to maintain the cash fund of Sao Vang, to ensure the payment of principal and profit for customers, pay commissions for employees and operating expenses. …

With the above deceitful tricks, Trang fraudulently appropriated the money of 433 customers with the amount of more than VND 223 billion. Specifically, Sao Vang original amount has not yet paid to these customers is more than 407 billion VND; the amount of profit paid is more than 174 billion dong; the amount of commissions for employees is over 9 billion.

For Pham Thi Thu Ha’s behavior, the investigation and police determined that between 2010 and 2016, Ha was a shareholder, holding important positions in the company, playing a role in helping for phishing page with the above tricks.

From 2015 to 2016, Ha helped Trang directly sign 70 investment cooperation contracts and 7 maturity contracts with 67 customers, and signed annexes of investment cooperation contracts with fixed profit agreements. Payable to customers 27.6% / year, expected profit from 15-36% / year, with commitment to pay profit in advance to customers, regardless of business results.

Consequently, 67 customers trusted and were “trapped” to pay Sao Vang, with the appropriated amount of nearly 24 billion VND.

The defendants petitioned for the return of additional investigation files because they believed that the case “omitted the crime”. Someone brought law books to court to prepare for the argument. Photo: Quang Hung

At the investigation agency, Trang confessed all the criminal acts committed by Trang. Ba Ria – Vung Tau Provincial Police CSDT has prosecuted the defendant, applied measures to prevent leaving the residence, delayed exit for Trang due to her pregnancy, child nursing under 36 months old.

However, on March 26, 2020, Trang fled the locality, so the investigating agency issued a pursuit decision, suspended the investigation for the accused and decided to separate the criminal case for criminal acts. Trang’s defendant, after being caught, will be handled later.

At the same time, the police agency ordered distraint, suspend transactions for assets such as land use rights, shares related to Trang and Sao Vang company.

Defendant Ha confessed his crime, but said that everything was directed by Trang, did not intentionally commit fraud to appropriate property with Trang.

However, with documents and evidence gathered together with testimony during the settlement of the case, the police agency determined that Ha was an accomplice with Trang on the crime of appropriating property.

In this case, the investigation agency also worked with 13 shareholders of Sao Vang company and identified some shareholders who did not participate in the company’s operations, did not know Trang and Ha committed criminal acts. insufficient grounds to consider criminal liability.
Meanwhile, some other shareholders denied the responsibility and role related to the defendant’s criminal acts, so when the Trang is arrested, the investigation agency will continue to consider and handle.

Patient Pham Thi H. has lingering complaints about doctors from Hue Central Hospital (facility 2) not having a practice certificate, belittling the patient’s life and causing serious consequences for the patient. harm to health and spirit.

In the press release, Hue Central Hospital Unit 2 appreciates the cooperation in resolving the matter in terms of professional identification in diagnosis and treatment at Ms. Pham Thi H.’s unit.

“Through a direct meeting between the hospital and Ms. Pham Thi H. on defining professional responsibilities in diagnosis and treatment of the disease; based on the content of the professional council on April 7, 2021 with the participation of highly specialized doctors and doctors of the hospital and lawyer Nguyen Van Ky (Director of Ky Nguyen Law Firm and Associates), they I would like to synthesize and analyze the remaining problems between the parties “, the press release of Hue Central Hospital Unit 2 stated.

During and after a prolonged treatment course, patient Pham Thi H. had persistent complaints.

According to the hospital, patient Pham Thi H. was diagnosed with a large lip tumor from the hospital. Through clinical examination, subclinical, medical consultation on September 16, 2020, patient H. had surgery to remove the tumor.

After the surgery, due to the incision in a sensitive area of ​​the woman, the nurse Van is the one who directly changes the bandage every day, reports the incision and the doctor Nguyen Du Quyen asks about the wound status of the patient Pham Thi H through nursing Van.

The fact that Dr. Quyen does not directly examine patients after surgery is wrong with professional regulations and inexperience in handling sensitive medical examination and treatment issues. Currently, after the patient has had a second operation to treat wound infections, Mrs. H.’s health has been stable and progressing well.

Doctor Nguyen Du Quyen is a doctor with full clinical practice time of 18 months. The time of surgery for patient Pham Thi H. Doctor Quyen is in the process of waiting for approval for the application for a practicing certificate. Furthermore, this doctor has a certificate of Oncology Specialist Direction and a Clinical Oncology certificate.

Hue Central Hospital Unit 2 affirmed that Doctor Quyen is eligible to operate surgery for patient Pham Thi H. under the guidance and supervision of a practical instructor.

However, the Professional Council concludes that in the process of medical examination and treatment for patient H., doctor Nguyen Du Quyen has not fully implemented the contents of the professional and technical process; do not explain thoroughly and thoughtfully to patients before and after surgery; do not follow up closely patients after surgery.

Hue Central Hospital Facility 2 said, disagreeing with patient H’s claim of VND 500 million.

When the incident happened, Dr. Quyen did not report to the leadership of the department or the leader of the disease for timely handling. Along with that, the leader of the Department of Oncology – Palliative Care is not closely involved in management.

With patient complaints about the location of surgery, the hospital explained: “The patient has had two operations in the operating room, but due to the incision in the sensitive area and ensuring the patient’s sophistication, the doctor should check in the minor operating room, not perform a bed check as usual. Therefore, it is not true that patient H. reflects his surgery at the hospital warehouse ”.

The hospital repeatedly met, reorganized and introduced the discipline of reprimand and benefit deduction according to the hospital’s internal spending regulations for two related doctors, Dr. Phan Canh Duy – Dean and doctor Dr. Nguyen Du Quyen.

The proposed Hue Central Hospital 2 will be responsible for all hospital fees and surgery costs for patient Pham Thi H. and willingly to support cosmetic treatment of the surgical wound and the caregiver. multiply the amount by 50 million. However, patient H. disagrees and asks the hospital to compensate for the amount of 500 million VND. This request is not consistent with the hospital’s financial capacity and not in accordance with the law.

“In case of disapproval of the plans given by the hospital, the patient has the right to initiate a lawsuit at the People’s Court of Phong Dien district for settlement according to the provisions of Clause 2, Article 80 of the Law on Examination and Treatment 2009.“, Hue Central Hospital Facility 2 stated in the press release.

After 3 days of questioning, on April 14, the representative of VKSND Hanoi announced the impeachment of 19 defendants related to wrongdoing at the second phase of production expansion project of Thai Nguyen Iron and Steel Company (TISCO).

Break contract rules

Accordingly, the VKSND proposed the Panel to sanction the defendant Tran Trong Mung, former General Director of TISCO, from 10-11 years in prison; Mai Van Tinh, former Chairman of the Board of Vietnam Steel Corporation (VNS), from 6-7 years in prison; Tran Van Kham, former Chairman of the Board of Directors, General Director of TISCO from 9-10 years in prison; Dau Van Hung, former General Director of VNS from 3-4 years in prison and 11 other defendants were recommended from 2-7 years in prison with the same crime “Violation of regulations on management and use of state property causes losses. , waste”. In addition, 4 other defendants were recommended 1-3 years in prison for the same crime of “Lack of responsibility, causing serious consequences”.

Defendant Mai Van Tinh at the trial

According to VKSND, TISCO is the investor of the second-phase production expansion project of TISCO. The VNS Board of Directors is the level of investment decision, with the function of directing project implementation. The winning bidder is China Metallurgical Science, Technology and Trade Corporation (MCC).

During the implementation of EPC Contract No. 01, more than 11 months from the effective date of the contract, MCC has not selected and signed the contract with the subcontractor; the detailed design of the items has not been completed, the machinery and equipment are not ordered to manufacture, the contract items have not been executed, but all people have been sent home; repeatedly proposed to extend the contract performance period; Unwarranted contract price increases …

With the assigned functions, duties and powers, defendant Mung is the General Director of TISCO and defendant Tinh, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of VNS, did not consider, direct the suspension, termination of the contract, withdrawal of advance payment, and use the contract penalty clause, report to the competent person for consideration to cancel the bid and re-organize the bidding according to regulations. On the contrary, the defendants directed the violations of the investment laws and the EPC Contract No. 01 to continue the contract performance, together with their subordinates in directing relevant individuals to the organization making adjustment of cost estimate part C. Along with that, participating in subcontracting to perform Part C of EPC Contract No. 01 in the form of unit price contract, TISCO directly takes over, takes over and makes payment. for the subcontractor to implement Part C, bear all risks, break the principle of implementing the contract in the form of a package, creating conditions for MCC to have a reason to deny the responsibility of implementing EPC Contract No. 01.

Competent contractor approval

In addition, the defendants also agreed that the Vietnam Industrial Construction Corporation (VINAINCON) was not qualified as a subcontractor to implement Part C of the EPC Contract No. 01, resulting in the project being delayed. raising interest rates, increasing investment costs, causing a particularly serious loss of state assets of more than VND 830 billion. The defendant’s behavior also adversely affects the interests of workers, indirectly adversely affects the economic development process and is currently a burden on the economy, affecting social security.

In this case, defendant Mung has the main role, is the person who directs and organizes the implementation of the offense. Specifically, when MCC breached the contract, the defendant directed to negotiate with MCC to separate Part C from EPC Contract No. 01, TISCO organized the implementation and took the risk; sign documents to report VNS and the Ministry of Industry and Trade request to report to the Government for approval of price adjustment for part C of the contract; Introduce and approve VINAINCON is not qualified as a subcontractor to perform Part C according to unit price …

Defendant Tinh is a co-offender of active crime. When TISCO reported the breach of the contract by TISCO, the defendant directed to negotiate with MCC to resolve the arising of EPC Contract No. 01; directly sign documents to request the Ministry of Industry and Trade to report to the Government for cost adjustment part C of EPC Contract No. 01; signed a document requesting the Government to agree on the policy of approving that VINAINCON is not qualified as a subcontractor to perform Part C; sign the written approval and assign the capital representative of VNS at TISCO to approve the adjustment of the total project investment structure, including the provision for part C of EPC Contract No. 01 increased by 15.57 million USD has no legal basis, is not in accordance with the provisions of EPC Contract No. 01.