Identification of the source of the first confirmed infection in Dongguan this round [#新华学院武汉校区2万老师学生不是去校#]On the evening of June 20, a new local confirmed case of new coronary pneumonia in Dongguan, Jia Moumou is a student from the Dongguan campus of Guangzhou Xinhua University. Currently, Xinhua University can only get in and out , Stop all offline teaching and provide unified online teaching. All students on campus return to the dormitory, and students are forbidden to gather together, and students outside the campus are isolated at home.

The Dongguan campus of Guangzhou Xinhua University currently has nearly 20,000 teachers and students. The government has sent a working group to the school, set up an on-site headquarters, strengthened the management of material supply, established a material supply team, timely grasped the basic needs of teachers and students, and is responsible for materials Quality assurance and price monitoring work. Xinhua College has 6 dining halls and 1 large material distribution center. The required materials are supplied by key material suppliers such as Jiarong and Jingdong to ensure the basic living service needs of teachers and students.
At the same time, government departments and schools actively do a good job of humanistic care. Attach importance to the psychological counseling of students, and make good statistics on the key populations of students, especially high-risk populations with special physical and mental health, to ensure that students can pass through safely. (Guangzhou Daily·Xinhuacheng reporter Wang Wanli)

Implementing Directive No. 10/CT-UBND dated June 19 of the Chairman of the Ho Chi Minh City People’s Committee on tightening and strengthening measures to prevent and control the Covid-19 epidemic in the city, the Department of Transport ) Ho Chi Minh City has issued notice 6346/TB-SGTVT for the organization of passenger transport by road and waterway from 0:00 on June 20 until further notice. The Can Gio – Vung Tau sea ferry is one of the waterways that must be temporarily suspended to prevent and control the Covid-19 epidemic. Accordingly, temporarily suspending road public passenger transport activities in the city, including: Buses, passenger transport vehicles on fixed inter-provincial routes and transit vehicles, taxis (Except for vehicles approved by the Department of Transport. announced activities to transport people to and from hospitals and medical centers in case of emergency), contract vehicles of less than 9 seats using technology application software to connect with passengers. Cases that are allowed to operate must meet the criteria for assessing the level of safety for transportation activities in the prevention and control of the Covid-19 epidemic in the city. Specifically, for contract cars and tourist cars: All bus trips when operating must ensure the maximum transport of no more than 50% of the capacity, no more than 10 people/trip (Including drivers, staff, and passengers). car attendant). Passengers in the car must wear masks properly, sit alternately, sit apart from the seats and are required to make medical declarations according to regulations. Vehicles must be equipped with disinfectant solution to serve passengers. Perform disinfection after each transport and daily. Refuse to transport passengers who do not comply with regulations. Vehicles carrying workers must not exceed 20 people/trip For buses transporting workers, employees and experts, before the operation, they must be disinfected, the occupants must wear a mask, wash their hands with an antiseptic solution, and undergo a medical check before boarding. vehicle and medical declaration as prescribed. The head of the unit must specify and fix the route, trip, and occupants to ensure tracing when there is a Covid-19 epidemic situation. All trips must ensure the maximum transport of no more than 50% of the capacity, no more than 20 people / trip, sitting alternately, sitting apart from the rows of seats. Taxis are announced by the Department of Transport to serve the transportation of people to and from hospitals and medical centers in case of emergency and contract vehicles with less than 9 seats that do not use technology application software connected to passengers. Passengers must perform: Transporting no more than 50% of the capacity, all occupants of the vehicle must make a medical declaration and wear a mask when using the service in accordance with regulations. The vehicle is equipped with antiseptic water and disinfects vehicles daily. Refuse to transport passengers who do not comply with regulations. Do not use the air conditioning system and force open the car window during passenger service. The ferry port is open, it is mandatory for guests to make a medical declaration For water passenger transport: Suspend the operation of river bus routes, Can Gio – Vung Tau sea ferry routes, Saigon – Can Gio – Vung Tau high-speed train routes and river-crossing passenger terminals and inland waterway wharfs. passenger transport. Cases that are allowed to operate include: Ferry terminals (Cat Lai, Binh Khanh and Can Gio – Can Giuoc), passenger wharfs across rivers, inland waterways for passenger transport (Can Thanh – Thanh An, Can Thanh). – Thieng Lieng, Phu Xuan – Phuoc Khanh), but must meet according to the set of criteria to assess the safety level for transportation activities in the prevention and control of Covid-19 epidemic in the city. The maximum passenger transport must not exceed 50% of the vehicle’s capacity, all people on the vehicle must wear masks and make mandatory medical declarations according to regulations. Passenger transport business units, operators of bus stations, ferry terminals, river-crossing passenger terminals and inland waterway terminals, individuals and organizations using passenger transport services by road and waterway implement the above contents and regulations on prevention and control of Covid-19 epidemic.

Judgment on Presale Fees Defeat for ticket retailer CTS Eventim

As of: 06/09/2021 5:24 p.m.

Are ticket retailers allowed to keep advance booking fees for concerts that have been canceled due to corona? The Munich Regional Court has declared a clause ineffective that excludes a refund. However, there is no general claim. Several CTS Eventim customers are upset. You had booked a concert at the ticket dealer early on, which was then canceled due to Corona. Nevertheless, CTS Eventim withheld the advance booking fee. Now they want the fee back. The North Rhine-Westphalia consumer center therefore took it to court and sued the company. With success: the consumer advocates were partially right at the Munich I Regional Court. The judges declared ineffective a clause in which the company had excluded a reimbursement of the advance booking fee if the event was canceled or postponed. A corresponding sentence in the general terms and conditions is illegal.

It depends on the contracts

In the opinion of the court, the ticket retailer must bear the risk of an event alone and should not pass costs on to the customers if the event does not take place. After all, the dealer collects a commission if an event goes off successfully, the judges argue. In addition, the amount of the advance booking fee is often not visible in the ticket prices, the court complained. This is not transparent. However, the judgment, which is not yet final, does not mean that all customers are now entitled to a refund of the advance booking fees for the concert that has been canceled due to Corona. That depends on the respective design of the contracts. CTS Eventim would only be responsible for the reimbursement at a commercial agency. Eventim arranges event tickets either through a commercial agency or through an organizer through a commission. In the latter case, the concert promoter would be responsible for the reimbursement. “We are assuming that in a large number of cases Eventim wrongly withheld amounts of money,” said Wolfgang Schuldzinski, board member of the consumer advice center in North Rhine-Westphalia. Now those affected who are in dispute with the group could ask it to pay and refer to the judgment.

CTS Eventim suffers from the lull in concerts

The dispute over the advance booking fee shows how tense the situation in the concert event industry is. The largest German ticket retailer CTS Eventim is suffering from the unusual concerts and events. In the first quarter of this year, sales collapsed by almost 90 percent compared to the same period in the previous year. The Bremen company slipped into the red. The number of employees including temporary workers fell by almost a third. Nevertheless, CEO Klaus-Peter Schulenberg does not give up hope of a new start soon. He relies on the “longing of people to experience culture together”. The more people vaccinated, the greater the chance of concerts.

EU funds for holiday flyers Aid for Condor declared null and void

As of: 06/09/2021 1:00 p.m.

The EU court annulled a decision of the EU Commission that allowed German aid for the Condor airline. Ryanair had sued against the release. Ryanair has achieved a success against state corona aid for the German airline Condor before the EU court (EGG). The judges overturned the EU Commission’s decision to approve the aid. The decision of the Brussels authority was not sufficiently justified, said the court in Luxembourg. In practice, however, this initially has no consequences: the effect of the declaration of invalidity was suspended until the EU Commission has passed a new decision. This means that Condor does not have to repay the money immediately.

Loan of 550 million euros

Germany had registered the aid in favor of Condor in Brussels in April 2020. This involved two government-secured loans with reduced interest rates in the amount of 550 million euros. The background was damage caused by the cancellation or postponement of flights due to travel restrictions in the corona pandemic. The low-cost airline Ryanair complained, among other things, of violations of the free movement of services and filed a lawsuit against the release.

Connection with bankruptcy proceedings?

At Condor, the situation had worsened due to the bankruptcy of the parent company Thomas Cook in autumn 2019, which preceded the corona crisis. The airline was only able to continue working with rescue aid of 380 million euros, which was also approved by the EU. The insolvency proceedings initiated at the time had to be extended after the outbreak of the Corona crisis because the new owner, the Polish aviation company PGL, had jumped off. The 550 million euros in government aid also included costs that resulted from the extension of the insolvency proceedings at Condor. Ryanair had argued that the commission had not explained why it had even included the extended insolvency period when calculating the damage to Condor from the corona crisis. The Condor case is one of many in which Ryanair is taking action against state corona aid for competitors. So far, the plaintiff has succeeded in some cases but not in others. (Case T 665/20)

Corona protection in companies Are employers allowed to force vaccination?

Status: 08.06.2021 7:13 p.m.

Since the beginning of the week, company doctors have also been able to vaccinate against Covid-19. But what about legally? Can companies require their staff to be vaccinated? And are they allowed to grant privileges to those who have been vaccinated? From Jens Eberl, WDR The companies have a great interest in preventing infections with the coronavirus and sick leave. This is why many employers want their employees to be vaccinated. With the start of vaccinations by the company doctors, various legal issues between employers and employees come to the fore. An overview.

Can the employer oblige his staff to vaccinate?

Employees only need to be vaccinated if there is a legal obligation to do so. There is no statutory vaccination requirement with Covid-19. “However, special features apply in facilities such as hospitals, prevention or rehabilitation facilities and medical practices,” says the Brühl-based specialist lawyer for labor law, Michael Felser. “They must ensure that all measures required by the state of the art of medical science are taken there to prevent infections and the spread of pathogens. Curiously, however, this does not apply in care facilities for the elderly, although the problem here is likely to be comparable”, so Felser. In the health care facilities mentioned, the employer cannot force employees to vaccinate either. However, he must ensure that non-vaccinated people pose no risk to patients. Patient protection can therefore make it necessary that non-vaccinated people can no longer work in certain areas.

Do employees have to inform the employer about their vaccination status?

Actually, there is no obligation to provide information about the personal vaccination status to the employer. However, the Gelsenkirchen labor lawyer Arndt Kempgens emphasizes that companies have to take corona protective measures for their employees. But they could only do that if the corona vaccination status was known. Kempgens concludes from this that in connection with Corona, under labor law – as an exception – there could be an obligation on the part of employees to notify the vaccination status and, under certain circumstances, to prove it.

Are vaccination incentives such as bonus payments from the employer permitted?

Employers could pay a “vaccination bonus”, for example through a one-off sum of money, vouchers or extra vacation days. Lawyer Felser says: “This is not entirely uncritical, because rewards can exert undue pressure not to exercise one’s rights. For example, courts have only declared rewards for employees who rarely get sick to be admissible under strict conditions.” The trade unions consider incentives for those willing to vaccinate to be permissible. However, they have a say in any case, as such a bonus is subject to co-determination. Kempgens emphasizes, however, that it must be fair: “There must not only be a bonus for those who don’t like vaccinations as an incentive to vaccinate, but if so, then for everyone.”

Can the employer exert “vaccination pressure”? Can the staff defend themselves against this?

If there is no statutory vaccination requirement, the employer cannot exert any pressure, neither with instructions nor with threats such as transfer or even warnings and dismissal. Such measures would be illegal. However, attorney Kempgens reports: “We are currently hearing more and more of such cases in legal practice. Pressure is exerted to convince those unwilling to vaccinate.” In extreme cases, employees can even defend themselves against this with an action for an injunction before the labor courts.

Are professional disadvantages possible if you don’t get vaccinated?

If there is no compulsory vaccination, the employer cannot differentiate according to whether someone is vaccinated or not or whether they have not wanted to be vaccinated in the past, as long as there was no obligation to do so. In medical institutions, however, the employer can reject applicants if they are not vaccinated and do not want to be vaccinated. Lawyer Kempgens, however, restricts: “Unvaccinated employees require other protective measures in the company and also lead to disagreements among the employees. For this reason, non-vaccinated employees will certainly not be preferred in the company in the near future.”

Are employers allowed to distinguish between vaccinated and non-vaccinated people?

“In my opinion, they even have to,” says Kempgens. “As with official measures, labor law restrictions are more difficult to justify for vaccinated people, while labor law protective measures have to be stronger for non-vaccinated people.” Felser believes privileges are conceivable, such as the earlier return of vaccinated employees from the home office to the office or the use of communal facilities such as the canteen. However, the incentive or pressure from such preferences should not be disproportionate.

Diners enjoy coffee outdoors, when shops are allowed to reopen after a 7-month separation to fight the COVID-19 epidemic, in Brussels, Belgium on May 9, 2021. Photo: AFP/VNA According to the Vietnam News Agency correspondent in Belgium, May 8 is the weekend that many people in this country have been waiting for a long time, because this is the reopening day of coffee shops, after 7 months the food service industry is forced to reopen. Closed to prevent the spread of COVID-19. At the outdoor terraces in the center of Brussels, customers are very crowded. They come here to get a taste of normalcy after days of social distancing, as if to celebrate the return of freedom. “It’s great! I came here from Germany to visit my children and it is very interesting to sit at a bar like this. In Germany, the restaurant has not yet reopened, so I have to take advantage here to enjoy a beer. in a bustling space like this,” shared Ms. Monika Lueder-Pohlenz, a tourist from Germany. In areas near the Grand Square in the center of Brussels, during the weekend, customers flock to crowded eateries. After months of forced savings, many people want to treat themselves to a delicious menu. Sesa Kardo said he waited a long time for this day to return to the restaurant he has been familiar with for many years, even though he had to sit outside. “I will eat half of this dish to save my stomach for another. Maybe I will become a glutton. A delicious meal, a delicious dish like this I haven’t enjoyed in a long time. I really enjoyed it. happy,” he said. All restaurants, beer bars, and cafes have tables on the sidewalk to serve customers. Mr. Aurélien – owner of a beer bar in La Bourse square, put a dozen tables in front of the door to serve guests and did not accept reservations in advance to be able to receive the most customers. “The partial reopening of the restaurant and courtyard has been prepared by us for a long time. In fact, during the lockdown, we planned. A week before opening. When the door reopens, we check it out so we can serve it properly,” said Aurélien. In Châtelain, another vibrant district of Brussels, many cafes have installed wooden platforms on the parking lot to save space. “It’s good to be out,” Amy Marshall, 42, smiles and is happy to feel life is “getting back to normal”. “We’re also here to support traders,” she explains. A little further afield, at Supra Bailly, a group of four young men gather to drink beer. “This is our ‘headquarters’,” said Guillaume, 37. They shared a smile and clinked a cup to congratulate the fact that from now on, they could gather together to eat, drink and chat every weekend. After 16 months of being forced to close by government orders to prevent the epidemic, Mr. Thys Daniel is now able to sell goods again at a small market selling handicrafts near the Grand Square in Brussels. He was very happy to be able to welcome visitors again as before. “This market is usually open on weekends and sells handicrafts. Today is an important moment for us, marking the lifting of strict lockdown measures. This allows people to return. normal life, being in contact with each other,” said Mr. Thys Daniel happily. When I asked him, when will life really return to normal. He replied optimistically: “That’s okay. Then we quickly find our old habits in a normal rhythm of life.” At restaurants, the reopening is done in a regulated manner. Each table is limited to 4 guests, except for members of the same family who may be larger. Restaurants are allowed to open to serve visitors until 22:00. Despite allowing restaurants to operate, with the condition that Belgians are still required to wear masks in public places, on public transport and implement distancing measures at stores. Belgian authorities are considering reopening festivals in the second half of summer. Access to large gatherings, banned in Belgium due to the COVID-19 pandemic, will depend on testing and vaccination. The Belgian government’s advisory committee will meet on May 11 to determine the conditions to expedite reopening. According to worldometers, as of May 10, Belgium has recorded over 1 million cases of COVID-19 and 24,511 deaths due to this dangerous disease.

By Christoph Kehlbach, ARD legal editors “Next Generation EU”: This is the name that the European Union has given its development fund. After tough negotiations, the EU decided in July 2020 on a new budget of an unprecedented amount. A total of 1.8 trillion euros has been earmarked for the budget up to 2027. A very significant part of this huge amount, more precisely: 750 billion euros, is estimated as corona aid. The money is to be used to cushion the economic consequences of the pandemic in the member states of the EU. They should receive part of the money as grants and another part as loans.

Some of the money is to be borrowed from the financial market

In order to finance this sum, however, the EU broke new ground: The so-called “own funds decision” of December 2020 stipulates that the EU Commission should take on debts on the capital market on behalf of the international community. Up to 750 billion euros should be flushed into the coffers – exactly the amount that is earmarked for the Corona aid fund. The EU then wants to repay the money by the end of the budget period. The member states must, however, agree to this procedure. The EU Commission can therefore only start taking out the loans and making payments once all 27 EU countries have ratified the decision. The Bundestag and Bundesrat cleared the way for this at the end of March. After the new decision from Karlsruhe, the Federal President can now also sign the ratification law.

Urgent motion against German law

A group of economics professors around AfD founder Bernd Lucke wants to prevent German participation in the project. More than 2000 citizens have joined the constitutional complaint. They take the view that the EU should not take out loans. The plaintiffs want the Member States to take on debt on their own responsibility instead of the EU in order to get the consequences of the corona pandemic under control. Because whoever is allowed to spend the money of other countries, so the argument goes, tends to “waste, inefficiency and overuse”. This ultimately leads to a communitisation of the debts, that is, a “debt union”. Germany will therefore be made liable for billions in debts of other countries.

Legal background

From a legal point of view, the question arises time and again in EU projects of this kind whether Germany surrenders essential competencies in the event of participation. Because they must continue to lie with the federal German organs, especially the Bundestag. Parliament should not be overlooked and take the most important decisions on income and expenditure in the German federal budget. The organs of the EU must also act within the scope of their competences. From a constitutional point of view, Germany can only participate under this premise. This is also where the lawsuit against the Corona aid fund begins.

Urgent examination

Because it takes until a final judgment, the Federal Constitutional Court should now decide in an urgent procedure. Karlsruhe first checked whether the lawsuit would later have no chance of success. In this case, however, the judges expressly did not see it that way. It says: The objections “in any case do not make it seem impossible that the authorization of the European Commission to borrow 750 billion euros on the capital market goes beyond the (…) authorization”. The Constitutional Court then summarily examined whether there was an overwhelming probability that the plaintiffs would be right. Specifically, therefore, that the budgetary responsibility of the Bundestag is actually undermined. However, the Federal Constitutional Court does not see this high probability; for example, because Germany itself does not have to be directly liable as a result of the borrowing. Based on this, Karlsruhe looks at the possible consequences: What if the application were accepted – and that turns out to be wrong afterwards? This in turn compares the Constitutional Court with the opposite situation: The application is initially rejected – and that later turns out to be wrong. According to the court, this balancing act is to the detriment of the plaintiffs: a delay in the entry into force of the capital adequacy decision would have serious consequences for the entire EU. The economic objectives would be completely impaired and the necessary impulses undermined. That makes the difference. Today’s decision is considered decisive – also for the further behavior of the other EU states. Approval can now also be expected here.

Consequences of the decision

Four weeks ago, the Federal Constitutional Court temporarily prohibited Federal President Steinmeier from signing the German consent law. He can now do this. Then nothing would actually stand in the way of the EU fund, which is due to start in the summer, from the German side. However, Karlsruhe will of course still give a verdict in the main proceedings. It does not have to be exactly the same as the urgent decision. At several points in the decision it can be inferred that the court has at least “minor stomach aches” with the EU plans. So the matter is not quite decided yet. Az. 2 BvR 547/21

By Peter Hornung and Shehab Sumon, ARD studio South Asia Bangladesh has imposed strict restrictions due to the increasing number of new corona infections. There is a strict lockdown with an all-day curfew – but there are exceptions. While most shops and markets are closed and local public transport is just as paralyzed as air traffic, Bangladesh’s textile factories are allowed to continue producing. “We have appealed to the government to keep the factories open,” said Khandoker Rafiqul Islam, vice president of the national association of textile manufacturers BGMEA ARD studio South Asia . The textile companies currently have so many orders: “It is our responsibility to deliver the work on time.”

Fear of another break-in – and of the virus

Bangladesh’s textile industry fears a similar slump as it did a year ago, when orders worth billions were canceled. At that time the government had also closed the textile factories. In addition, the international fashion companies wanted to lose significantly less weight because of the pandemic – a disaster for the country’s most important industrial sector, which is responsible for 80 percent of Bangladesh’s exports. Although the major customers came back later, they would have asked for large discounts in some cases, according to BGMEA. So one damage remained. But now it’s different – the sewing machines keep running. Also that of Shoheda Akhter, who has been working for “Solar Garments” for 16 years, one of the numerous textile factories in Bangladesh’s capital Dhaka. Nevertheless, the 30-year-old is very worried. On the one hand, because she is afraid of losing her income again, as she did last year, her factory should still have to close. On the other hand, because she is afraid of the disease. Even with a low fever, she is afraid of being infected, says Shoheda. After all, with so many factory workers, it is not an easy task for companies to ensure safety.

Jharna Begum hopes not to get infected with the corona virus in the textile factory. But she is dependent on her work. Image: Shehab Sumon / ARD-Studio South Asia She goes to work on foot in the morning and does not drive an overcrowded company bus like many other workers. But the danger is real. Nevertheless, someone like her cannot actually afford to be afraid of corona, says Shoheda: “We get money when we work. If we don’t work, we don’t get anything. So we don’t have much leeway to think about the corona virus.” The equivalent of about $ 250 a month, Shoheda’s family of four lives on. Your own income is even more important since her husband lost a better-paying job in the textile factory because of Corona and can only work as a doorman. Shoheda’s colleague Jharna Begum feels the same way – the fear of loss of income is greater than that of illness. The security in the factory is not far off, says the 26-year-old. “Because this is a textile production, we have to work very closely with one another. We cannot keep the required distance at all. That is due to the nature of our work.”

Open textile mills less dangerous than closures?

In view of the corona risk, it is better to leave the factories open than to close them, says BGMEA Vice President Khandoker Rafiqul Islam, who is a factory owner himself. “During the lockdown last year, we found that the virus is more likely to spread when the bus stations are full and the streets are because workers are moving home.” At that time, the workers had fled the cities by the hundreds of thousands in pure need so as not to starve to death. But isn’t there a risk that the textile factories will become hotspots because of the working conditions? No, says the textile entrepreneur, all hygiene regulations must be observed. In addition, there are company-owned hospitals and isolation centers for the workers. The workers ‘organization “Bangladesh Center for Workers’ Solidarity” does not require the factories to be closed for safety reasons. Her most important demand: the workers’ wages must under no circumstances be cut or completely canceled – like last year, when many were suddenly left with nothing. Aika Fischbeck from the German women’s rights organization Femnet says that the international fashion companies should not be indifferent to what is going on in Bangladesh: “We not only see the factory owners in Bangladesh as having an obligation, but also the fashion companies commissioned should and must take responsibility also ensure that the factories can observe distance rules and hygiene measures in order to protect the workers from infection. ” The only hope left for the worker Jharna Begum is to get through the pandemic in good health despite the working conditions in the textile factory and to be able to continue to feed her family. Because her husband is unemployed because of the effects of the corona pandemic, so the couple cannot repay loans at the moment. But the 26-year-old is confident: “With the grace of the Almighty, he will get a job again as soon as the coronavirus is over.”

Produced | Sohu Think Tank

Edit | Yuan Changyou

Wu Xiaoqiu, vice chairman of the Academic Committee of Renmin University of China and dean of the China Capital Market Research Institute, said in a guest program of “National Wealth Lecture Hall” recently that an important sign of the success of capital market reform should be among the top 10 listed companies in China by market value. , There are at least 5 high-tech companies.

Wu Xiaoqiu said that the capital market focuses on growth. In the past, the capital market paid too much attention to traditional industries and confuses importance and growth. Therefore, one of the important signs of the success of the capital market reform is that among the top 10 listed companies in China by market value, there are at least five high-tech companies.

“At present, Moutai and financial companies rank relatively high. Although financial institutions are very important, they are the country’s important tools and towns, but in terms of industrial competitiveness, investor returns and asset growth, high-tech companies are more important. It is important.” He said that if the current policy guidance allows commercial banks to flow 400-500 billion yuan into high-tech companies from the profit of more than 1 trillion yuan, then the market value rankings of listed companies will undergo major changes in the future.

Wu Xiaoqiu said that without the intervention of new finance, the process from new technology to new industry will be very slow. To this end, we should fully realize the role of finance in promoting the transformation of new technologies into new industries. The role of finance is not only to provide loans for enterprises, but also to incubate the emergence of new enterprises and promote the transformation of new technologies to new industries. This is the deeper meaning of financial services to the real economy.

“Although traditional markets are easy to manage, they have weak functions, a single unit, and low efficiency. China’s financial development to the current prosperity is the result of persisting in reform and opening up, marketization, and the integration of technology and finance. We cannot Let it return to the era of traditional finance.”

Wu Xiaoqiu emphasized that China’s financial market competition is not yet sufficient. It is necessary to promote financial market competition through financial disintermediation reforms and technological reforms. At the same time, appropriate financial policies must be provided so that the high-tech real economy can obtain more profits.

He pointed out that the valuation of technology companies can reach 50-70 times, while the average value of the banking industry is about 5 times. The highest valuation of China Merchants Bank is only 10-12 times. “If profits can flow to high-tech companies, the value of China’s capital market will not only be 80 trillion, but may reach 120 trillion or more. This will help us reach the goal of a securitization rate of over 100%.”

[Sohu Think Tank: Gather the wisdom of scholars and entrepreneurs to get the pulse of economic trends. If you are interested in contributing or contacting on-site reports, interviews, and program cooperation matters, please send an email to zhikucaijing@sohu.com]

From Claudia Kornmeier, ARD legal editors

Can the federal government issue corona rules?

Yes, he can. Because the legislative competence for infection protection lies with the federal government. According to Article 74, Paragraph 1, No. 19, the “measures against publicly dangerous and communicable diseases” are a federal matter. The federal states are only responsible if the federal government has not regulated anything. So far, the federal government had set a certain framework, but then authorized the states to decide specifically which measures should be taken to combat the pandemic. That is why the corona rules have so far mainly been issued by the federal states by ordinance. But that should change now.

Could the federal government lay down even more corona rules?

Yes. The Bundestag could stipulate further concrete measures directly in the Infection Protection Act. However, it is also planned that the Infection Protection Act will in future also allow the federal government to take further measures for all of Germany by ordinance. Corona measures can be adjusted a little faster and more flexibly via statutory ordinance than in a legislative procedure.

To what extent does the Federal Council have to be involved in the reform?

The federal states are involved in the legislative process at federal level through the Bundesrat. There are laws that the Federal Council must approve in order for them to come into force. The Land Chamber can only appeal against the majority of the laws. Then a mediation committee has to be convened. In this way, a legislative process can at least be delayed. According to the Basic Law, the approval of the Federal Council is not required for protection against infection. The federal government also assumes that the current law is merely an “objection law”. However, it is controversial as to what applies when infection protection, for example, coincides with the issue of education, for example when schools are closed. Because the federal states are responsible for education. And with previous changes, the Infection Protection Act was also viewed as an approval act.

Is a curfew legally permissible?

Whether curfews are proportionate is very controversial. Critics doubt that such restrictions are even suitable for containing the infection rate. If you go for a walk alone at night, you don’t risk any infections. However, exit restrictions are more about preventing inadmissible private meetings. If you have to be home by 9 p.m., you may not even have dinner with a group of friends. In the past there were already comparable exit restrictions in some federal states. Some of them were overturned by the courts. Some courts have also questioned the effectiveness of exit restrictions. In other cases, exit restrictions were also overturned because the seven-day incidence was low at the time and continued to fall. However, the legislature also has a certain amount of leeway. In the explanatory memorandum for the law, the Federal Government expressly refers to experience in other countries and scientific studies. It may well be that the currently planned regulation will ultimately end up with the Federal Constitutional Court.

Who can overturn these new rules?

Only the Federal Constitutional Court can overturn the planned statutory rules. The corona regulations of the federal states, on the other hand, can be attacked before the administrative courts. If there are federal ordinances, things will look a little more complicated. In these cases, too, one could first sue the administrative courts. Filing a constitutional complaint directly could also be permissible. However, the hurdles are high.

The head is the waste-bearing part of the shrimp and accumulates many heavy metals such as arsenic. So we should not eat shrimp heads. For pregnant women, the toxicity of arsenic heavy metals is often very strong, eating a lot can lead to fetal defects or miscarriage. Big shrimp need clean processing, remove the head to ensure safety.

Illustration.

To gain weight, people often pump brine shrimp, even glixerin – substances from fat hydrolysis. The impurities pumped shrimp is a suitable medium for bacteria to grow.

If you eat this type of shrimp, you will be at risk of poisoning, dangerous diseases such as cholera, diarrhea, typhoid, digestive disorders.

In addition to the first part, when buying shrimp, mothers need to observe whether the shrimp’s legs are still attached to the body or not, the shrimp meat must be firm. In addition, you should not choose to buy shrimp whose legs have turned black as this is a sign that they are no longer fresh.

Note when processing and eating shrimp

Do not process shrimp in combination with vegetables, tubers and fruits rich in vitamin C. When vitamin C meets toxins available in shrimp, it will spread leading to food poisoning.

Everyone thinks, shrimp shells contain a lot of calcium. However, this is not true. Shrimp shells are hard due to the main component of chitin, a polymer that makes up the shell for most crustaceans. The main source of calcium for shrimp is from shrimp meat. In addition, the shells of some shrimp species are relatively difficult to digest, absolutely not for children to eat because they are prone to choking.

In addition, the black or white thread on the back of the shrimp (also called the shrimp thread) is the digestive tract of the shrimp that contains the stomach and colon. This route is usually only seen in large shrimp. Eating shrimp sugar is not harmful to health, because the bacteria in shrimp thread die at high temperatures when cooked. However, you should remove the shrimp sugar to make the dish cleaner and more secure.