TSMC sits on the world’s top chip manufacturing technology, and holds the largest number of EUV lithography machines, with a market share of more than half of the global market. It can be said that TSMC is well-deserved in the world, and chips as a necessity in various fields, TSMC’s strength and status have been fully embodied.

However, TSMC is still accelerating its deployment. This time TSMC is targeting talents. According to news from Taiwanese media on June 13, TSMC’s 2021 doctoral scholarship application has ushered in a critical moment.

In order to cultivate outstanding talents, TSMC provides subsidies for doctors who meet the conditions, up to 5 years. The annual subsidy is 1.155 billion yuan, which is 577,500 yuan in five years. Almost all of these doctors involved in semiconductor-related industries can apply for high subsidies from TSMC.

Through large subsidies, TSMC can promote more talents to participate in the research and development of the semiconductor industry. And considering TSMC’s local influence, it is estimated that most of these doctoral talents who have received subsidies from TSMC have been accepted by TSMC.

TSMC, which has a generous shot, does not take this money in its eyes. After all, TSMC can make hundreds of billions of dollars every year. As long as top semiconductor talents can be cultivated and used by TSMC, the money is worth it.

TSMC’s emphasis on talents is not only that. In September last year, TSMC cooperated with six local universities to set up semiconductor disciplines. Regarding the cultivation of advanced integrated circuit talents as a goal, and this year TSMC has made a lot of money, not only can attract talents, but also prevent the loss of talents. After all, apart from TSMC, I am afraid it will be difficult to find better trees to live in.

Ren Zhengfei’s call

TSMC does not hesitate to spend a lot of money to support and subsidize talents. Although TSMC has not clearly stated that it wants these talents to enter TSMC, from the perspective of the conditions of TSMC’s subsidy application, they are all aimed at doctors engaged in research in the semiconductor industry.

TSMC happens to be a leader in the semiconductor field. Obviously, TSMC’s subsidy is to reserve talent for itself. It also fully reflects TSMC’s emphasis on talents. As long as talents can be obtained, spending high scholarships is a trivial matter. It seems that Ren Zhengfei’s call should be taken seriously.

When Ren Zhengfei visited Shanghai Jiaotong University, he said that we must attach importance to and respect talents, which is the key to the development of national science and technology and social progress. Attach importance to personnel training, and basic scientific research is the prerequisite for development.

Ren Zhengfei’s call only expresses one point of view, that is, to have enough attention and respect for talents. TSMC pays great attention to its large-scale scholarships, and it does not explicitly require these talents to join TSMC to respect them. Therefore, Ren Zhengfei’s call should be taken seriously. Don’t let the talents run away and start to regret it. It will be too late then.

China has started action

TSMC’s ability to become the world’s number one is more than just mastering advanced EUV lithography machines.

It also has top semiconductor industry experts such as Zhang Zhongmou, Lin Benjian, Jiang Shangyi, Liang Mengsong, Hu Zhengming and so on. Either one is enough to change the pattern of the semiconductor industry, and TSMC has countless top talents. This is also an important reason for the rise of TSMC.

Although Jiang Shangyi, Liang Mengsong, and Hu Zhengming have all left, and Zhang Zhongmou has retired, but with Liu Deyin and Wei Zhe’s pillars, TSMC will not fall.

It is worth mentioning that China has already begun to act. Let the state come forward and let Tsinghua University, Xiamen University, Nanjing University and many other universities develop the national integrated circuit industry integration innovation platform. Assist the rise of talents in China’s integrated circuit industry and attach importance to the development and cultivation of corresponding talents.

As the world’s largest chip foundry, TSMC has mastered advanced technology. There are indeed many things that mainland semiconductor companies can learn from. The emphasis on talents requires the long-term efforts of domestic semiconductor companies and the industry. For the future of Chinese chips, we must pay attention to it.

to sum up

TSMC’s investment in talents is an investment in the future of the company, because TSMC knows that no matter how advanced technology is, talents are needed to participate in research and development. Advanced chip manufacturing processes such as 5nm, 4nm, and 3nm are all at the forefront of the world.

The chip is man-made, not made by God. If others can, why can’t we. I believe that with sufficient talent reserves, no matter how difficult it is to make chips, no matter how big the difficulty is, it can be overcome one by one.

Court separates claim from administrative case vụ In 2015, Mr. Tien (Mrs. Ngoc’s husband) won the auction of two stalls in Cao Lanh City’s cage and signed a contract with the management board of the market to sell sports equipment. After that, he asked to switch to selling cosmetics and was approved by the Finance – Planning Department, so he bought more than 500 million dong of goods for sale. More than a month later, he had his license to sell cosmetics revoked. The market management board of Cao Lanh city, Dong Thap province seized the goods of Mrs. Dang Thi Bich Ngoc and her husband. Photo: YC In July 2016, Chairman of the City People’s Committee Cao Lanh fined Ms. Ngoc 2.5 million dong for doing business as a household business without a business household registration license in accordance with the law. Ms. Ngoc complained but was denied. Because she still sells cosmetics, the chairman of the City People’s Committee again fined her 3 million dong. Ms. Ngoc sued all three of the above decisions. Then she closed the counter, waiting for the trial, the market management board unlocked the stall by itself, seizing all the cosmetics. In 2018 and 2019, the People’s Court of Dong Thap province and the High People’s Court in Ho Chi Minh City both accepted the petition of Ms. Ngoc and her husband, declaring to cancel all three decisions. The claim was separated by the court into another case. Accepted for nearly two years, brought to trial three times and then suspended According to the instructions of the two judgments above, Ms. Ngoc and her husband went to sue the Chairman of the People’s Committee and the People’s Committee of Cao Lanh City for compensation. Specifically, regarding the compensation claim, the first instance court said that it was not related to administrative decisions but to civil business and commercial relations, so it should be separated into another case. As for the appellate court, it clearly states that “the fact that the market management board officers counted, counted and sealed the goods Ms. Ngoc was selling, if causing damage to Ms. Ngoc, she has the right to sue these people to demand compensation for the damage. by another case”. Since then, she has sued the president and Cao Lanh City People’s Committee for compensation as instructed by the two courts. However, the Cao Lanh City People’s Court, after accepting this case for nearly two years and bringing it to trial three times, suspended it on the grounds that the lawsuit claim had been settled by a legally effective judgment. Previously, at the trial on March 25, 2021, the trial panel paused the trial and transferred the file to the police agency to see if there were signs of criminal offense when losing her box… As soon as she received the decision, Ms. Ngoc appealed the request to cancel the suspension decision and asked the court to continue the settlement. According to Ms. Ngoc, the court’s suspension is to deprive her of her right to sue, which is an illegal act. At the same time, Ms. Ngoc also filed a complaint against the judge who was handling the case because she thought that the judge was not objective, lacked transparency, and issued an illegal suspension decision. Court accepted the reason there was “misunderstanding” Talking to PV, the judge dealing with the case said that Ms. Ngoc must sue the market management board about a contract dispute or a civil dispute for compensation for damage from the contract. The judge analyzed: Ms. Ngoc asked the Chairman of the People’s Committee and the People’s Committee of Cao Lanh City to pay compensation due to the administrative decision, the appellate judgment of the High People’s Court was resolved (rejecting the request because the above decisions were not the original reason). directly causing damage to Ms. Ngoc). Reporter asked: “If so, why is the court still accepting, after nearly two years and three times of trial, it has been suspended?”. The judge admitted the court also had a “misunderstanding”. After a period of research, she realized that the court stopped her and allowed her to sue again with another case. Court suspension: Wrong or right? Commenting on this issue, Dr. Nguyen Van Tien, Deputy Dean of the Civil Faculty of Ho Chi Minh City University of Law, said that: According to the notice not to prosecute the case of Cao Lanh City Police and the decision to settle the complaint of the Procuracy. It was found that due to the direction of the Chairman of the People’s Committee and the People’s Committee of Cao Lanh City, the market management board came to seize the goods. Therefore, the fact that Ms. Ngoc sued the Chairman of the People’s Committee and the People’s Committee of Cao Lanh City is grounded. However, even if the market management board follows the instructions, they are still the ones who directly seize the goods leading to damage, so the market management board must be responsible. The Finance – Planning Department (with written consent for Ms. Ngoc to convert the counter into a cosmetic business) together with the Market Management Board to seize the goods, should also be jointly responsible. According to Dr. Tien, the general rule is that whoever causes damage must compensate. Therefore, Ms. Ngoc can sue the Chairman of the People’s Committee, the People’s Committee of Cao Lanh City, the Market Management Board and the Finance – Planning Department to jointly compensate for damage caused by the illegal seizure of goods. Dr. Tien said that the court’s suspension on the grounds that Ms. Ngoc’s request was resolved was not convincing. In this case, the court needs to clarify the cause-and-effect relationship between the decision-making and direction of the City People’s Committee and the seizure of goods by the market management board. It can be seen that the cause of the incident was partly from the direction of the City People’s Committee, but the market management board did not voluntarily implement it. Therefore, Ms. Ngoc’s lawsuit to request the defendants to jointly compensate must be considered an unresolved claim as determined by the first-instance and appellate judgments in the previous administrative case. Sued additional market management board, why still suspend? Before filing the lawsuit, I reported the seizure of goods to the police to investigate the crime of openly appropriating property. However, the police and the People’s Procuracy of Cao Lanh city said that the market management board performed the tasks assigned by the People’s Committee of Cao Lanh City, with no signs of crime. Therefore, my wife and I sued the Chairman of the People’s Committee and the People’s Committee of Cao Lanh City. My third additional claim is that the Chairman of the People’s Committee, Cao Lanh City People’s Committee, Market Management Board, Finance – Planning Department (under Cao Lanh City People’s Committee, participating as a related person) must jointly compensate usually the amount of goods illegally seized (nearly 500 million dong), not a claim for compensation caused by an administrative decision. Mrs DANG THI BICH NGOC

Facebook may be fined $ 1.8 million in Israel for “acquiring” 2 companies without permission According to Reuters, Facebook is facing a fine of up to $ 1.8 million for its act of acquiring two Israeli companies, RedKix Inc in 2018 and Service Friend Ltd in 2019 but without approval and violating the law. clause in the Economic Competition Law of Israel. Authorities in the country argue that Facebook has a market share in Israel in excess of 50% and that the group must report transactions and obtain consent before any merger in the country. . The authorities also said that Facebook and Istagram are two exclusive social networks in Israel. Facebook will face a hearing soon and the company will have 60 days to appeal the charges before serving the fine. Talking about this, Facebook has denied allegations of antitrust behavior and said that Facebook is still cooperating with the investigations of the authorities. In addition, Facebook believes that there is no reporting obligation in relation to these transactions and hopes that the competent authorities will come to the right conclusions. Last year, Facebook was also fined by the US federal court up to $5 billion related to data privacy violations and forced Facebook to strengthen privacy protections, provide quarterly report on the implementation of the agreement and the establishment of an independent monitoring board. In Canada, Facebook was also fined $6.5 million by the Competition Bureau for sharing user information with other companies.

The Manor Central Park creates successive modern Hang streets, promising to create one of the busiest commercial destinations in the capital when it comes into operation. (Photo: The Manor Central Park). In addition to the income level many times higher than the average income of the majority, the elite community is also people with a respectable cultural background, knowledge and living capital. With their own taste, they are especially picky in their life experiences. A recent Wealth-X statistic shows that 30% of billionaires live in 15 cities. The place with the highest concentration of super-rich people is the largest city in the United States – New York, while the Japanese capital Tokyo ranks at 15. The strong attraction of these cities to the elite is partly proven. in famous neighborhoods like Ginza and Manhattan. GINZA: TOKYO’s LUXURY METHOD In Tokyo – the thriving urban center of Japan, Ginza is one of the most unique shopping streets, attracting the elite to trade and trade. From the 1870s, Ginza began to urbanize, learning Western planning methods and architecture. Ginza is one of the most unique shopping streets, attracting the upper class to trade and trade. (Image: Pixabay.com). The harmonious blend of tradition and modernity, reflected in the old shops and the trendy shops, is what describes the current Ginza. The most attractive areas such as: Ginza Six, a huge shopping center with more than 200 famous brands of cosmetics, furniture, and fashion; Ginza Wako sells luxury jewelry or Itoya sells popular stationery. Attraction with the elite pushed up land prices in Ginza sharply. According to The Japan Times, in 2017, the price of Ginza land was the most expensive in Tokyo when it reached 50.5 million yen/m2 (equivalent to 11.2 billion VND), one third of the peak period due to the real estate bubble in 1990. Despite the expensive prices, the owners of the world’s leading brands, from fashion such as Chanel, Dior, Gucci, Prada… to electronics Apple, Samsung, Sony… all have stores here. MANHATTAN: HEART OF NEW YORK CITY Not only is New York’s famous financial center, Manhattan is also considered the cultural, financial, media and entertainment “capital” of the whole world. In particular, Downtown Manhattan is imbued with New York history with centuries-old churches or magnificent European-style neighborhoods. Expressions of Manhattan’s innovative spirit are skyscrapers, architectural marvels that “draw a new horizon” for New York. Regardless of day and night, Manhattan is always vibrant and bustling, attracting those who love dynamism. The main intersection of the district is Times Square, which is packed with shops, boutiques and giant billboards. Right in the heart of the excitement and bustle is Central Park – Central Park with an area of ​​3.4km2, always attracting millions of visitors each year with a series of special events and festivals. Those are the factors that make Manhattan real estate always in the top of New York and the whole of America. The median home price for sale is nearly $1.5 million, five times the average in the United States, according to Zillow – a popular real estate website in the US. INTERNATIONAL CITY INSPIRATION IN HANOI Attracting global elites and tourists from all over the world, it is not surprising that Ginza or Manhattan have become the inspiration for high-end projects. In Vietnam, one of the investors in this direction is Bitexco with The Manor Central Park urban area. Not only inspired by the hustle and bustle of major cities in the world such as Ginza or Manhattan, The Manor Central Park also inherits the trading culture of 36 Hanoi streets by creating modern streets. great. Rows of commercial townhouses run one after another throughout the entire urban area, promising to turn this place into a bustling and attractive destination not only for neighboring people, but also anyone who has the opportunity to visit Hanoi. Noi, turning The Manor Central Park into a leading “destination real estate” in the capital. The urban area is located at the southwest gateway of Hanoi, adjacent to the large Chu Van An park. With a total planning area of ​​up to 89.7 hectares, The Manor Central Park is impressed by its smart open plan, diverse utility system, “measurement and tailoring” for the elite community of residents. The urban area is also “breathed” by the architectural consultancy EE&K; Kume Sekkei and American architect Carlos Zapata – the leading names in real estate planning and design in the world. Carlos Zapata used to accompany Bitexco to create iconic works such as Bitexco Financial Tower in Ho Chi Minh City and JW Marriott Hanoi Hotel.

Amazon’s distribution center in Las Vegas, Nevada, USA, April 25, 2020. Documentary photo: AFP/VNA The appeal comes after the LuxLeaks scandal exposed in 2014 revealed 500 tax agreements between Luxembourg and more than 350 international businesses, including many billion-dollar tax frauds and involving corporations. such as Apple, IKEA, Pepsi… These corporations have had tacit agreements with the tax authorities of Luxembourg to enjoy lower tax rates than prescribed. In the case of Amazon, in 2017 European Competition Commissioner Margrethe Vestager accused Luxembourg of having an illegal arrangement with the online commerce giant to pay less tax than other businesses. other profession. Accordingly, Luxembourg has offered a preferential tax policy for Amazon, helping nearly three-quarters of the company’s profits not be taxed. At the heart of the EU’s allegations is Amazon’s violation of the so-called “market price principle”, which ensures that transactions between subsidiaries are based on prices that other independent companies in the market would charge. must return. At the time of the EU case, Amazon said it had not received any special treatment from Luxembourg, and insisted it had paid taxes in full in accordance with both Luxembourg and international tax law. However, analysts are not too optimistic about the ability of the EU’s requirements to be upheld. Less than a year ago, iPhone maker Apple won a spectacular victory in this same court against the European Commission’s request that Apple pay 13 billion euros in taxes to Ireland in 2016. But whether it wins or loses in the appeal, the European Commission will likely emphasize its goal of targeting corporate profits. The agency is also developing new rules to close tax loopholes, especially for tech giants. In recent weeks, the US side has gradually embraced the idea of ​​a global minimum corporate tax. Negotiations on cross-border corporate tax are underway at the Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD). If successful, this tax policy will make special transactions for multinational companies a thing of the past.

Accordingly, the group is asking Apple to return money to UK customers, with about 19.6 million people will be compensated a total of 1.5 billion pounds (equivalent to 2.1 billion USD). They believe that the US technology company has a monopoly when the App Store is the only “door” to download many applications to iPhone and iPad. The application emphasizes that after 13 years, the App Store is still the only source for Apple devices to access applications, proving that the company has been selfish, charging login fees and using this mechanism unfairly. They claim this is proprietary behavior. According to the lawsuit, Apple receives about 30% of the cost of purchasing an app. Apple, for its part, calls this a planned lawsuit and shouldn’t have happened. The company insists it is committed to its customers and that the App Store has greatly benefited the UK creative economy.
In addition, Apple is currently facing many legal challenges related to exclusivity when using the App Store because of a lawsuit for the same reason by Epic Games – the maker of the famous Fortnite game. according to iMore

However, the accusations of Chanel did not receive the consent of the court. Although Chanel tried to argue that if the Huawei logo were rotated horizontally, there would be similarities between the two symbols, the court disagreed with this argument. Chanel accused Huawei of “stealing” their logo ideas. Photo: Android Authority. “The differences have to be compared like what was registered, not changing its direction,” said the reviewer. This is the second time that Huawei and Chanel have entered into a legal struggle in European courts. Prior to that, Chanel was sued. According to the Android Authority , the famous fashion brand still has a chance to appeal this ruling, when the case will be brought to the Court of Justice of the European Union, the highest authority in the country. Logo is an important element in the brand identity of any company. Well-known logos not only signify brand status, but can also become cultural markers. Some well-known brands show cultural symbols such as Coca-Cola, Nintendo and FedEx.

Around 2009, his family asked to redeem the transferred land, but Ms. Hoi did not agree, he cut down the eucalyptus tree to build a house to live in. Seeing damage, he filed a lawsuit and the case was resolved by the People’s Court of Phu Tan district in 2011 and resolved by the People’s Court of An Giang province in 2012. After that, the People’s Court of Phu Tan district tried the second time and the results rejected the request. claiming his family’s LURC. Specifically, the court accepted a part of the request of Mr. Men, Mrs. Manh; recognizing the area of ​​Mr. Men, Ms. Manh transferred the land use right of 939.1 m2 to Ms. Le Thi Hoi; At the same time, he forced his family to dismantle, relocate the house, and return the area of ​​535.6 square meters of land to Ms. Hoi. Mr. Nguyen Van Men presented the case to An Giang Newspaper “When I transferred the land, my family did a“ land purchase and sale sheet ”but this paper later showed signs of repair, not true to reality. Although my family asked the court to reconsider the land sale paper, it was still not considered and resolved by the court of 2 levels. The land I sold before was only 700m2, now up to 939.1m2 of land and this balance must belong to my family ”- added Mr. Nguyen Van Men. Explaining this, Ms. Le Thi Hoi said that the amount of land she transferred from the family of Mr. Men, Mrs. Manh bordered the land with many people, now she still holds the land purchase and sale papers. The transferred land has a width of 17.50m, the length from the dam of the field to the edge of Provincial Road 954, although the area of ​​purchase of 700m2 of land, the actual measurement is 939.1m2 of land, and has been granted a LURC. The purchased land has a large tunnel pair of large rural roads and over the years of renovation, there is a surplus of land. After that, Mr. Men’s family self-renovated the land, bundled the foundation, down the stone pillars to build the house to take up the sold land. Since then, there have been disputes and lawsuits to many places and years. This case was considered and resolved by the court, without the fact that she forged papers like Mr. Men and Mrs. Manh’s family falsely accused. After many times the court considered and resolved, Mr. Men ‘s family believed that the injustice should continue to complain and initiate lawsuits. By January 23, 2016, high-level People’s Court in the city. Ho Chi Minh opened the cassation hearing to review the case. The results, cancel the previous first-instance and appellate judgments, hand over the case files to the People’s Court of Phu Tan district for first-instance trial according to regulations. On May 22 and 28, 2018, An Giang Provincial People’s Court tried appellately on “Dispute of the land use right transfer contract; claim land use rights and compensate for damage ”. The results, revising the first instance judgment No. 48/2018 / DS-ST dated February 27, 2018 of the People’s Court of Phu Tan district, recognizing the land use right transfer contract of 939.1 square meters on July 19, 1997 between Mrs. Le Thi Cheer and Mr. Nguyen Van Men, Ms. Nguyen Thi Manh. Because the appellate judgment takes legal effect, then the case has been executed in accordance with law. The Men family continued to appeal to many places. On 10-10-2019, the high-level People’s Court in the city. Ho Chi Minh issued a notice not to accept the appeal according to the cassation procedure of the family of Mr. Men, Mrs. Manh. On August 24, 2020, the High-Level People’s Procuracy in the city. Ho Chi Minh issued a notice on the non-appeal of cassation review to the An Giang People’s Court’s Judgment No. 106/2018 / DS-PT dated May 28, 2018 due to no basis for consideration and resolution. Lawyer Tran Ngoc Ban (An Giang Province Bar Association) said that the People’s Court implements a two-level system of first-instance and appellate trials. The first-instance judgments or decisions that are not appealed or protested within the prescribed time limit shall become legally effective. For first-instance judgments or decisions that are appealed against or protested, the cases are subject to appellate trial and the appellate rulings take legal effect. However, in the trial process, there are many reasons for the inaccurate point of the judgment or decision in effect. In order to ensure the trial work and the protection of the involved parties’ legitimate rights and interests, legally valid and erroneous judgments and decisions must still be protested for re-consideration according to cassation procedures. or reopening. Cassation and reopening procedure is not a trial level, it is only the procedure for reviewing effective judgments or rulings due to errors or violations of law; or discovering new and important details of the case that the court and the involved parties do not know or know. Posts, photos: NR