Usually, these dresses are extremely elaborately designed, with delicate details and sometimes hidden special details for the bride and groom. Besides, they are always designed by the most famous figures in the fashion industry. 6th place: Sarah Ferguson – Duchess of York The wedding dress was embroidered with the initials A and S (Andrew & Sarah) with silver beads. Wedding date: July 23, 1986 Location: Westminster Abbey in London Cost: £35,000 Designer: Lindka Cierach The most royal detail: The wedding dress was embroidered with the initials A and S (apparently by Andrew & Sarah) in silver beads. 5th place: Meghan Markle The chiffon is decorated with floral embroidery from 53 countries of the Commonwealth. Wedding date: May 19, 2018 Location: St George’s Chapel in Windsor Cost: £110,000 Designer: Givenchy is a French fashion house, but the dress was created by British designer Clare Waight Keller. The most royal detail: The 16-foot wedding dress and veil were decorated with floral embroidery from 53 Commonwealth countries. 4th place: Princess Diana The longest wedding dress in royal history. Wedding date: July 29, 1981 Location: St Paul’s Cathedral in London Cost: £151,000 Designer: David Emanuel The most royal detail: The longest wedding dress in royal history. In addition, the neckline and sleeves are made of lace, bulging with bold 1980s characteristics. 3rd place: Princess Eugenie Floral prints on the satin fabric of the wedding dress are meaningful symbols. Wedding date: October 12, 2018 Location: St George’s Chapel in Windsor Cost: £200,000 Designers: Peter Pilotto and Christopher De Vo The most royal detail: Floral prints on the satin of the wedding dress are symbolic of significance, including Scotland’s thistle, Ireland’s Shamrock, York’s rose and ivy. 2nd place: Kate Middleton – Duchess of Cambridge Long-sleeve ivory satin bodice with patterned, lace-up. Wedding date: April 29, 2011 Location: Westminster Abbey in London Cost: £250,000 Designer: British designer Sarah Burton from Alexander McQueen brand. The most royal detail: Long-sleeved satin bodice in ivory with pattern, lace appliqué. 1st place: Queen Letizia of Spain Real gold threads are skillfully embroidered on silk. Wedding date: May 22, 2004 Location: Church of Santa María la Real de la Almudena in Madrid Cost: £6 million Designer: Royal couturier Manuel Pertegaz The most royal detail: Real gold threads are skillfully woven on silk. Which dress do you like the most?

Queen Elizabeth II is the daughter of King George VI. After the death of George VI on February 6, 1952, Elizabeth succeeded to the throne and became Queen of England. Although she ascended the throne shortly after the death of King George VI, the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II was held on June 2, 1953. Queen Elizabeth II’s coronation in 1953 marked the first time that a King/Queen coronation was televised. According to one statistic, about 27 million people watched the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II via television. The list of guests attending the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II includes members of the British Royal Family as well as other royal families. Many heads of state, prime ministers and statesmen in countries such as British Prime Minister Winston Churchill. On June 2, 1953, 8,251 guests arrived at Westminster Abbey to attend the coronation of Queen Elizabeth II. On her coronation day, Queen Elizabeth II wore a gown designed by Norman Hartnell. On the dress of the head of England, there are flower symbols of the countries of the Commonwealth such as: Tudor rose of England, thistle of Scotland, leek of Wales, dandelion of Ireland, Australian acacia, Canadian maple… Norman Hartnell and his professional team took 3,500 hours to complete the gown for Queen Elizabeth II to wear at the coronation. Queen Elizabeth II wore three different crowns during the coronation ceremony held from Buckingham Palace to Westminster Abbey. Invite readers to watch the video: The Queen of England summons people to deal with the epidemic. Source: People’s Television.

Australia has been repeatedly damaged by rats in recent years. Photo: Guardian. Australia’s National Science Service and the Department of Animal Health have agreed to issue an emergency license to the country’s pesticide agency to produce double doses of rat poison in an upcoming series of products. The dose and percentage of the drug in the wheat fields remained the same, but the amount of zinc phosphide (Zn3P2) in each dose was doubled. Zinc phosphide is an inorganic chemical compound, consisting mainly of two elements, zinc (Zn) and phosphorus (P). This compound exists mainly as a gray solid, with some commercial samples being dark or even black. It is mainly used as a rat poison. In addition, there are applications in the production of semiconductors. Zinc phosphide is very toxic. In many labels, the substance is marked “Highly Hazardous,” meaning that in amounts between 1 and 50 mg can be lethal. For many years, zinc phosphide has been widely used, but strictly controlled. However, for farmers in the eastern and southern states of Australia, the current dose of zinc phosphide is not enough to prevent rat infestations. Researcher Steve Henry of the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) said that rats have a mechanism to quickly develop an aversion to lures, if the dose of zinc phosphorus in the drug is increased. “We call it the curry effect. If you go out, eat some food, and feel nauseous when you get home, you won’t go back to that restaurant,” he explains. This basis helps CSIRO boldly increase the dose of toxicity, although it increases the risk of death in humans, if accidentally exposed to the decoy. The high-dose drug will be on the market soon, and it will cost farmers about $1 more per kilogram. In eastern Australia, including parts of New South Wales and southern Queensland, where rats ravage crops and cause significant damage to hay and grain stocks, companies and farmers have been allowed to experiment. new drugs. Before that was agreed, scientists had hoped that heavy rain and colder temperatures would reduce the harmful effects of rats. However, that didn’t happen. In most of the affected towns, the rats, which can breed from 6 weeks old and give birth every 21 days, continue to destroy crops and even attack livestock. The New South Wales Farmers’ Association, said conventional rat poison products were in short supply, and prices skyrocketed. They needed a new direction, effective and immediate. The organization has partnered with the National Women’s Union, calling for a financial aid package for the rat epidemic. This group proposes, each farm is provided with $ 25,000 for the cost of rat poison. A survey of 1,100 farmers across New South Wales found that 94 per cent of their farms had been attacked by rats. On average per capita, each individual spent up to 150,000 USD on rat poison. A third of those surveyed revealed that the loss of grain and fodder stockpiles ranged from $50,000 to $150,000. 5& this number claims, they have lost more than 250,000 USD. Some farmers had to abandon the entire spring-summer crop. About 40% of farmers planted less seeds this past winter. More than 80% of respondents reported damage to machinery and infrastructure. And only a third suffered less than $150,000 in damage. Lisa Minogue, a farmer in the Barmedman area, said she washed her clothes 38 times in just three days. “The smell of rats is horrible. It’s impossible to know exactly how many are in the house,” she said. Rats have even attacked rural hospitals, biting patients. Many local health authorities have reported an increase in rat-related diseases. In New South Wales, about a third of farmers surveyed admitted their health was directly affected by the outbreak and 85% had trouble sleeping. Australian Women’s Union president, Danica Leys, said: “Everyone has been affected, from farms, to hotels in the area, to retail food businesses, to bakeries, supermarkets, malls, etc. child care centers and nursing homes. These financial and health ramifications all followed an unprecedented drought that triggered catastrophic wildfires. It’s time for the state government to act.” The Premier of New South Wales, Gladys Berejiklian, acknowledges the problems posed by the nasty rodents.” On 2GB radio, she said: “Depends on living, but the problem seems to be getting worse. more, due to the shortened reproductive time of mice. They are now too crowded, to the point of being difficult to control. The authorities are doing everything they can to avoid a natural disaster.” New South Wales Deputy Premier and National Leader, John Barilaro, said the state government and the Australian Government were speeding up lobbying to change the codes of conduct. “We need to support farmers so that they have enough bait to kill rats in the near future,” he told the National Assembly. New South Wales Agriculture Minister Adam Marshall left open the possibility of controlling diseases that can be spread by rat populations. Among them, the most dangerous and scary is the plague. “There is currently no clear suggestion to solve. Maybe, the government has to use strong measures, including ways that are considered illegal. All to help farmers fight the disease,” he said. emphasize. In the immediate future, Australian farmers still use traditional methods such as setting traps or using drones to drop bait with rat poison from above. However, the problem has only just begun, considering the rapid reproduction rate of mice. A pair of mice can give birth to new cubs after 20 days, giving birth to more than 500 young in a season. Adult female mice can lay litters 3 weeks apart.