Text | Xu Yuan Today, Jiangxi reported the results of the investigation into cheating incidents in relevant test centers for the 2021 college promotion exam. After investigation, there were serious cheating in the test centers of Nanchang Institute of Technology and Jiangxi Institute of Technology. The invigilators at the two test centers secretly photographed the test questions with their mobile phones and sent them to the relevant institutions, and the institutions then fed back the answers to the candidates. Among them, 151 candidates cheated in the test center of Jiangxi Institute of Technology. At present, many university teachers have been detained. According to a report from the Jiangxi Education Department, the entire cheating process can be described as bold and frantic. The invigilator secretly took photos of the questions in the examination room and sent them to the relevant educational consulting agencies. In the test center of Jiangxi Institute of Technology, the invigilator even sent the answers. In order to allow candidates to receive the answers smoothly, the educational institution arranged for a sophomore to write the answer on the door of the toilet. Under the connivance of the invigilator, the examinee tacitly walked out of the examination room and copied the answers on the grounds of going to the toilet. There were as many as 151 participants, and the number was shocking. The “Criminal Law” stipulates that in the national examinations prescribed by the law, anyone who organizes cheating shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not more than three years or criminal detention, concurrently or solely with a fine; if the circumstances are serious, he shall be sentenced to fixed-term imprisonment of not less than three years but not more than seven years and a fine . It can be seen that the law’s punishment for organizing cheaters is not light. But even so, cheating incidents continue to emerge in an endless stream, and it seems to be the hardest hit area for fraud cases. Facts have proved that the sentencing of the law is not sufficient to restrain offenders’ impulse to commit crimes. Students’ high training fees and huge profits are enough to make them take risks. In order to “improve” the results of the junior college, the school often closes one eye and turns the other open and deliberately releases water on the discipline of the examination room. Therefore, the college entrance examination, which is the second college entrance examination for students, is reduced to a diploma transaction under the manipulation of these fraudsters. Candidates who cheat can easily win admission tickets to the undergraduate course, while those who do not follow the crooked ways and rely on their own hard work and strength to take the exam are eliminated. It’s time to clean up this muddy water. Although the college entrance examination is not as rigorous as other national examinations, since it is a selective examination, fairness is its most basic consideration. It cannot give cheaters room for loopholes, create a sense of deprivation for other candidates, and make people question the national examination. Credibility and the majesty of the law. Taking the two fraud cases in Jiangxi as an example, although the participants showed their magical powers, the invigilators were inseparable from the core links. If the invigilator does not secretly take photos of the answers in the examination room and send them to the joint organization, the difficulty of the entire cheating operation will suddenly increase. And to prevent the invigilator from guarding and stealing, it is not impossible. According to common sense, invigilators are all university teachers and have a career structure. It is hard to imagine that they break the law and break their jobs for petty gains once or twice. Being able to embarrass with outside institutions, most of them have deep or long-term bondage of interests. In order to cut off this kind of interest connection, can I choose to cross invigilate the exam in a different place to make it more difficult for the invigilator to buy through? Of course, the invigilator can blatantly commit crimes without the assistance of the overall environment. At the test center of Jiangxi Institute of Engineering, the answers of 151 students were consistent with the answers of the toilet door panels, indicating that these 151 people had been in and out of the test room during the test. The chaos has reached this point, and it is temporarily unclear whether this is the test room or the vegetable market. Even if the invigilator turned a blind eye, didn’t the other patrol teachers in the examination room arouse alertness? Apart from student reporting, are there no other channels and methods for discovery?

Both the test center and the administrative department are paralyzed and lack sufficient vigilance. If, like the college entrance examination, a solid barrier is erected around the examination room, invigilators and students are not allowed to bring mobile phones into the room, all signals will be shielded, or, as in some places, the “dual proctoring mode” of examination proctoring and video proctoring is adopted. No matter how good a cheating institution is, it’s hard to know the questions of the exam. Even if someone vents the question in advance, the answer cannot be sent to the examinee. Of course, this will increase the cost of the organization and require a lot of effort, but for the fairness and credibility of the exam, isn’t it worth trying it? Even if it cannot be aligned with the input of the college entrance examination, the relevant departments must find ways to plug the loopholes, instead of letting the fraud case go round and round, and let the college entrance examination, which bears no expectation of rising mathematics, become a joke in the eyes of the public.

If the fraud trend is not curbed, fraud will gradually become a normal behavior, and more and more students will lose awe of the rules and want to gain benefits through the sidelines. Facts have proved that some training institutions organized cheating. After being pushed to the cusp of public opinion, they were not ashamed, but rather proud. “Leaking questions” became a big marketing gimmick, which was surrounded by a large number of students. The food is so ugly, how can the competent department take it lightly. For some training institutions that have “contracted” and “100% promised”, they need to be vigilant and strictly supervised, so that they dare not act recklessly.

In this case, a training institution involved in the case, without the qualifications to run a school, was able to play fraudulent games and became a trader of 151 major fraud cases. This is suspicious of the daily supervision of the local education authority. Is it in place. Participants have now accepted legal punishment, but how to prevent them from making a comeback, and at the same time let other training institutions try to follow suit, not dare to touch the red line, and tortured the wisdom of the local management department.

Regardless of the nature of the exam, fraud must be severely punished and never relented. However, legal punishment alone is not enough to restrain the daring of those who are inspired by benefits. Without prior supervision and strict control of all aspects of the examination, it is difficult to stop this unhealthy trend. What ultimately jeopardizes the gold content of the college upgrade examination and hurts. It is the efforts of most candidates to change their destiny.

Construction

Capacity profile fraud

Recently, the Education and Times newspaper received feedback from readers about the serious violations of the Bidding Law in Package 12: Construction, supply and installation of equipment for the whole project (except for the part of Package 13) belonging to the project of headquarters of the People’s Court of Ha Dong District.

Bidding package is procured by Hanoi Civil and Industrial Construction Investment Project Management Board.

The decision on contractor selection is signed by the leader of the Hanoi Civil and Industrial Project Management Board to select the contractor to execute the bidding package.

The person who signed the Decision is Mr. Luong Thanh Phong – Deputy Director of Hanoi Civil and Industrial Project Management Board.

According to readers, on December 18, 2020, the Management Board of Hanoi’s civil and industrial construction investment projects had Decision No. 354 / QD-BQLDADD & CN approving the selection results. Select the contractor of Package 12: Construction, supply and installation of equipment for the whole project (except for the part of package 13) belonging to the head office project of the People’s Court of Ha Dong district.

Accordingly, CID HOLDINGS Joint Stock Company is the winning bidder, the bidding package price is VND 27,607,384,000; Winning bid price is: 27,468,439,000 VND, contract execution time is: 355 days, the form of contractor selection for this package is public bidding.

However, in the finalization of corporate income tax at the Tax Department of Nam Tu Liem district, CID HOLDINGS Joint Stock Company (tax code 0107005836), is located on the 22nd floor of Vinaconex 9 Building, Lot HH2-2 Pham Hung Street, Me Tri Ward, Nam Tu Liem District, Hanoi City in 3 years (2017-2018-2019) only achieved an average annual revenue of 26.9 billion VND.

Specifically, in 2017, the company’s revenue was only 213,539,301 VND; in 2018 was 39,499,342,800 VND; in 2019 it is 41,216,509,132 dong.

Under the guidance in Circular No. 03/2015 / TT-BKHDT and as required by the bidding documents issued by the Management Board of civil and industrial construction projects of Hanoi City in Section 2.2 of The evaluation criteria table of competence and experience clearly states that the minimum annual average revenue of an enterprise must reach 42 billion (the minimum average revenue meets the requirements of the bidding documents).

The elephant goes through … the pinhole

Thus, with an average revenue of only 26.9 billion in the last 3 years, it is clear that CID HOLDINGS Joint Stock Company is not eligible to bid. And should be, the bid of CID HOLDINGS Joint Stock Company must be the agency responsible for detecting the above fraud and removed from the beginning, but it is not clear how, this unit is still allowed to attend. bid review and bid winner !?

In addition, in Section 3 of the Criteria for Evaluation of Competency and Experience, there is a requirement that the minimum number of similar contracts must be equal to 3 or different from 3, at least one contract with a minimum value of 20,000. .000.000 VND and total value of all contracts ≥ 60.000.000.000 VND from 1/10/2017 up to the time of bid closing.

It is known that in the past 5 years, CID HOLDINGS Joint Stock Company has been announced to win 4 bidding packages, all of which have low value, including: Package 3 Supply and transportation of VTTB and accessories (winning price is 2 , 7 billion VND; won the bid on May 3, 2019) invited by the Central Region Power Project Management Board; Package No. 03: Construction of the project of Quynh Bao Commune Medical Station, Quynh Phu District, Thai Binh Province (winning bid price is 5.08 billion VND; Winning the bid on 2/2/2020)….

Due to the above-mentioned irregularities, readers suspect that the leaders of CID HOLDINGS Joint Stock Company have falsified the documents to bid and win the bid.

The fact that CID HOLDINGS Joint Stock Company does not meet the financial criteria but still wins the bid, causing public opinion to question: Is the investor deliberately “creating conditions” for CID HOLDINGS Joint Stock Company to win? Bid?

With the manifestations of fraud and violation of the Bidding Law of CID HOLDINGS Joint Stock Company that has been mentioned by the public, the leaders of the Hanoi People’s Committee are requested to direct relevant agencies to enter, investigate, and clarify early. and strictly handle violations according to law provisions (if any).