<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Compulsory test &#8211; Spress</title>
	<atom:link href="https://en.spress.net/tag/compulsory-test/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://en.spress.net</link>
	<description>Spress is a general newspaper in English which is updated 24 hours a day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2021 08:23:09 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">191965906</site>	<item>
		<title>What the new compulsory test means</title>
		<link>https://en.spress.net/what-the-new-compulsory-test-means/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 24 Apr 2021 08:23:09 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compulsory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compulsory test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corona pandemic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corona test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[means]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Rapid test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Self test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://en.spress.net/?p=7535</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[From today on, employers must offer corona tests to all employees who are not in the home office. Who receives test offers and how often? And: does the staff have to be tested? Answers to important questions. In Germany, employers must now offer their employees corona tests. The federal government decided to do this in [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong> From today on, employers must offer corona tests to all employees who are not in the home office. Who receives test offers and how often? And: does the staff have to be tested? Answers to important questions.</strong> In Germany, employers must now offer their employees corona tests. The federal government decided to do this in the form of an amendment to the existing SARS-CoV-2 occupational health and safety ordinance.</p>
<h2> What are employers now obliged to do?</h2>
<p>All employees who do not work exclusively at home must be offered a corona test in their companies on a regular basis. The ordinance of the Federal Ministry of Labor enables self-tests as well as quick tests in which trained personnel take a smear. It is only stipulated that the tests must be used to directly detect the pathogen of the coronavirus.</p>
<h2> How often do tests have to be offered?</h2>
<p>As a rule, employees who do not work in the home office must be offered at least one corona test per calendar week according to the regulation. Two test offers per week are expressly required for groups with an increased risk of infection. This affects, among other things, staff with many personal customer contacts, employees who are housed in shared accommodation, as well as employees who perform body-friendly services &#8211; for example in cosmetic studios and massage parlors.</p>
<h2> Is there a test requirement for the staff?</h2>
<p>No. It is a test offer obligation for employers. In principle, employees are free to accept these offers or not. The Federal Ministry of Labor argues that the legal hurdles for compulsory testing are too high. &#8220;The obligation to cooperate of employees in occupational safety would not cover such a test obligation,&#8221; said a ministry spokesman. However, the federal government has called for employers to take advantage of the test offers.</p>
<h2> How do the companies have to implement the obligation? </h2>
<p>The employers must make the tests available and document that they have purchased the tests or offer appropriate test capacities. However, you do not have to document that your employees make use of them. It is therefore actually sufficient to send self-tests home to employees or to make self-tests available to everyone in the company.</p>
<h2> Who pays for the tests?</h2>
<p>The employers have to bear the costs for the tests offered. According to its own information, the federal government expects that the test offers initially required by the end of June will cost 130 euros per employee. Companies that are particularly burdened can, however, claim the expenses as part of an application for bridging aid.</p>
<h2> What should the tests bring?</h2>
<p>The tests are designed to help detect corona infections in people who do not yet show any symptoms or no clear symptoms. However, a negative test result is no guarantee that the person concerned is not infected. Even if handled correctly, a negative test is &#8220;just less likely&#8221; to be contagious to others, explains the Robert Koch Institute. Against this background, the ordinance of the Federal Ministry of Labor justifies the new obligation with the aim of &#8220;reducing the operational SARS-CoV-2 infection risk&#8221;. According to the current status, negative test results are only meaningful for the current day. Therefore, even before the regulation came into force, there was criticism that one or two tests per week were not sufficient.</p>
<h2> Why is the federal government introducing compulsory testing? </h2>
<p>The federal government did not consider the implementation of the test offers of the companies on the basis of the voluntary commitment to be sufficient. In the debate about the implementation of the test offers in practice, the various sides cited different numbers. On April 8, the federal government published the results of a survey carried out on its behalf. It came to the result that 69 percent of the companies and around 70 percent of the employees either already received regular test offers or these should follow shortly. This proportion was well below the aforementioned target of 90 percent. Two days earlier, the major trade associations had published their own figures, according to which 80 to 90 percent of the companies were already offering tests or were preparing to do so immediately.</p>
<h2> What criticism is there from the employer?</h2>
<p>Leading trade associations such as the Federation of German Employers&#8217; Associations (BDA) describe the mandatory test offers as a &#8220;declaration of mistrust towards companies&#8221;. The test requirement is criticized as &#8220;another bureaucratic burden&#8221;. In addition, various associations stated that there were problems, especially for smaller companies, in obtaining sufficient quantities of the required tests.</p>
<h2> </h2>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">7535</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Companies have to offer corona tests</title>
		<link>https://en.spress.net/companies-have-to-offer-corona-tests/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 16:09:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COMPANIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compulsory test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corona]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corona test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Offer]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Salvation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Scholz]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Tests]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Workplace]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://en.spress.net/?p=3098</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[In the future, companies will be obliged to offer employees corona tests at least once a week. The German middle class has already announced that it will take legal action against the obligation decided by the cabinet. Now it&#8217;s official: employers in Germany will have to offer their employees compulsory corona tests from next week [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>In the future, companies will be obliged to offer employees corona tests at least once a week. The German middle class has already announced that it will take legal action against the obligation decided by the cabinet.</strong> </p>
<p> Now it&#8217;s official: employers in Germany will have to offer their employees compulsory corona tests from next week if they are not working from home. That is what the federal cabinet decided. It is only about an obligation for companies to make an offer &#8211; there is no obligation to test for employees. The employers also do not have to document whether the employees have accepted the offer. Labor Minister Hubertus Heil said that he had already signed the ordinance and that it would come into force &#8220;next week&#8221;. Initially, it applies until the end of July. Usually the employer has to offer one test per week. Employees in professions with a high risk of infection should receive an offer twice a week.</p>
<h2>Up to 30,000 euros fine</h2>
<p>The health and safety authorities of the federal states should monitor compliance with the obligation &#8211; for example in response to a complaint from employees. Violations can result in a fine of up to 30,000 euros. Government spokesman Steffen Seibert called on employees to accept the offers. &#8220;The Federal Government appeals to employees to act responsibly and to accept the offers for testing that are made to them, although they are not obliged to do so.&#8221; The employers have to pay for the costs. Federal Finance Minister Olaf Scholz rejects a reimbursement by the state. &#8220;This is now a national effort and everyone has to participate,&#8221; said the SPD politician in <em>Deutschlandfunk.</em> &#8220;Companies that have a business that can continue their production are in a far better position than the companies that now really struggle every day with the fact that, for example, the restaurant is not opening, the hotel is not operating properly can be.&#8221;</p>
<h2>&#8220;Effort not disproportionate&#8221;</h2>
<p>Scholz also referred to the extensive economic aid in recent months. &#8220;Last year it was 80 billion. If you add the tax breaks, just under 190 billion, all together,&#8221; said the SPD candidate for chancellor. &#8220;That is why I believe that this mandatory test is a reasonable and necessary measure.&#8221; Minister of Labor Heil also defended the new requirements. &#8220;It&#8217;s an effort, but it&#8217;s not disproportionate,&#8221; said Heil im <em>ARD morning magazine</em>. The CDU Economic Council expects the tests to cost German companies more than seven billion euros a month. Some small and medium-sized businesses couldn&#8217;t afford the hassle. Companies that have been badly hit by the Corona crisis can count the expenses for the tests as a cost item for the bridging aid.</p>
<h2>Business associations are storming</h2>
<p>Nevertheless, the business associations are storming against the regulation. &#8220;Once again politicians are trying to shift their duties on to employers, not to mention the costs,&#8221; said the President of the Federal Association of Wholesale, Foreign Trade and Services (BGA), Anton Börner, to the newspapers of the Funke media group. Nine out of ten companies would already test their employees for the corona virus or will do so shortly. As a matter of principle, Börner only advocates event-related tests: &#8220;Fixed test intervals are unsuitable.&#8221; The German middle class announced that they would file a lawsuit against the agreed obligation to offer corona tests. &#8220;Medium-sized companies must and will defend themselves against this. As an association, we are currently preparing the necessary legal steps for this,&#8221; said Markus Jerger, Federal Managing Director of the Federal Association of Medium-Sized Business (BVMW) to the newspapers of the &#8220;Funke Mediengruppe&#8221;. &#8220;Corporate testing is a lesson in policy failure.&#8221; He accused the federal government of having failed all along the line when it came to testing and vaccination logistics. The craft also clearly opposed compulsory testing. &#8220;We still consider a statutory test obligation for our craft businesses to be neither necessary nor expedient,&#8221; said the President of the Central Association of German Crafts (ZDH), Hans Peter Wollseifer, of the Rheinische Post. He also criticized that the state wanted to &#8220;shift responsibility for fighting the pandemic to the economy&#8221;. Most companies are volunteering to test their employees or are preparing to do so immediately. A test obligation is &#8220;a legally unnecessary action&#8221;.</p>
<h2>Still a long way off from a nationwide offer</h2>
<p>In fact, only a third of companies currently offer their employees one test per week. Another 30 percent were aiming for this in the next four weeks, as the Institute for Employment Research (IAB) announced after a survey of 2000 companies from the end of March to the beginning of April. Minister of Labor Heil that is not enough. The offer must be comprehensive, he told him <em>ARD morning magazine</em>. At the moment the situation is very different depending on the industry and company size. As the IAB survey shows, the most tests are carried out in large companies. According to this, 60 percent of the companies with at least 250 employees offer their employees corona tests, a third of these companies planned to do so recently. As the size of the company decreases, the proportion of companies that already give their staff a test opportunity drops rapidly. According to the IAB survey, there are also clear differences between the sectors. Corona tests are most widespread in education, health and social services, where 58 percent of companies already offer corona tests and a further 22 percent were planning to do so. In the area of ​​transport and logistics, the test offer is only 17 percent.</p>
<h2>Sufficient tests available?</h2>
<p>Small companies in particular are wondering whether enough self-tests are now available at all. According to Federal Health Minister Jens Spahn, the deficiency that existed in March has been eliminated. On Friday he had assured that there were &#8220;more than enough of the tests&#8221;. The federal government has ordered over 130 million self-tests for the months of March and April from various manufacturers, above all Roche and Siemens. According to the ministry, there are also enough rapid tests for use by trained staff. For this year they have secured a quota of 550 million and, if necessary, a further 100 million pieces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">3098</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>What the mandatory test means in concrete terms</title>
		<link>https://en.spress.net/what-the-mandatory-test-means-in-concrete-terms/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 11:12:33 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compulsory test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Concrete]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corona pandemic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[mandatory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[means]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Terms]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[test]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://en.spress.net/?p=2640</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Anyone who does not work in the home office should receive corona tests from their employer in the future. What does that mean for companies? Who gets how many tests? And what does business say about it? The most important questions and answers. In Germany, companies should in future have to offer their employees corona [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Anyone who does not work in the home office should receive corona tests from their employer in the future. What does that mean for companies? Who gets how many tests? And what does business say about it? The most important questions and answers.</strong> </p>
<p> In Germany, companies should in future have to offer their employees corona tests. The SPD declared that there was consensus in the coalition. Accordingly, the federal government is striving for a package solution: The corresponding change to the occupational health and safety ordinance is to be initiated together with the planned amendment to the Infection Protection Act in the cabinet meeting on Tuesday.</p>
<h2>What is specifically planned?</h2>
<p>The draft of the Ministerial Ordinance by Labor Minister Hubertus Heil is based on this <em>ARD capital studio</em> in front. Accordingly, it is about a test offer obligation for companies &#8211; there should be no test obligation for employees. Every employee who does not work in the home office should initially receive one test per week from the employer. If you have a lot of contacts, you should get two tests.</p>
<h2>What does that mean for companies? </h2>
<p>The employers have to make the tests available &#8211; but they do not have to document that their employees also use them. It would therefore be sufficient to simply send self-tests home to employees or to deposit self-tests in the office so that they are accessible to everyone. The CDU Economic Council expects the tests to cost German companies more than seven billion euros a month. Some small and medium-sized businesses couldn&#8217;t afford the hassle. Companies that have been badly hit by the Corona crisis can count the expenses for the tests as a cost item for the bridging aid.</p>
<h2>What should the tests bring?</h2>
<p>The quick or self-tests are intended to help detect corona infected people who do not yet feel any clear symptoms. According to scientists, however, they cannot rule out an infection. Even when used correctly, a negative test is &#8220;just less likely&#8221; to be contagious to others, explains the Robert Koch Institute. Especially with infected people without symptoms there is a risk of false-negative results. It is unclear whether you are then contagious to others or not. The test results are also only meaningful for about a day. Many people therefore doubt whether a weekly test in the office is sufficient.</p>
<h2>How many companies already offer tests? </h2>
<p>According to a survey commissioned by the federal government, 61 percent of employees recently had an employer who offers corona tests. Other employers had promised the employees tests. If you add this group, around 70 percent of employees received a test offer or at least it was announced to them. The federal government does not consider this to be sufficient and has so far given 90 percent as the target.</p>
<h2>How do the companies get the tests? </h2>
<p>In a letter to the Chancellery, the major business associations emphasized that every third company reported difficulties with availability. The federal and state governments have already reserved many of the tests on the market for students. The associations are therefore calling for tests from unused contingents to be made available to companies at low cost. Vice Chancellor Olaf Scholz (SPD) said at the weekend in the &#8220;Frankfurter Allgemeine Zeitung&#8221;: &#8220;There are now enough tests available on the market. But you have to take care of them. Anyone who is just starting to get offers now probably needs a start-up time of two or three weeks. But no more than that. &#8221;</p>
<h2>How high is the risk of infection in the office anyway? </h2>
<p>Leading aerosol researchers from Germany emphasize that Sars-CoV-2 is transmitted &#8220;almost without exception&#8221; indoors. So you can get infected not only when you meet an infected person directly, but also in an empty, poorly ventilated room in which an infected person was previously. Berlin mobility researchers are therefore demanding that multi-person offices can only be entered with a valid rapid test or after vaccination &#8211; or everyone would have to wear an FFP2 mask.</p>
<h2>Why has the coalition now apparently agreed on the subject?</h2>
<p>Above all, the SPD had insisted that the companies be obliged to the test offers. At first, the Union did not want that. Now, according to reports, she is taking part because she does not want to jeopardize another project: In the package with the mandatory test offer, the nationwide rules in the fight against the third corona wave are to be decided in the cabinet.</p>
<h2>What does the economy say about it? </h2>
<p>Business associations reject the measure. BDA General Manager Steffen Kampeter speaks of a &#8220;declaration of no confidence in the company and its employees&#8221;. The obligation to test leads to more bureaucracy and discredits the voluntary commitment of companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2640</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>Apparently agreement on compulsory testing for employers</title>
		<link>https://en.spress.net/apparently-agreement-on-compulsory-testing-for-employers/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[editor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 16 Apr 2021 10:46:54 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Business]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Agreement]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Apparently]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[COMPANIES]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[compulsory]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Compulsory test]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Corona pandemic]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[employers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[German]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Germany]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[testing]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://en.spress.net/?p=2581</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[Companies should apparently be obliged to offer a corona test offer for employees. According to the SPD, the coalition is in agreement. The Ministry of Economic Affairs gave in, according to a report. There is an agreement in the coalition to oblige companies to offer a quick test for face-to-face employees in the company. The [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>Companies should apparently be obliged to offer a corona test offer for employees. According to the SPD, the coalition is in agreement. The Ministry of Economic Affairs gave in, according to a report.</strong> </p>
<p> There is an agreement in the coalition to oblige companies to offer a quick test for face-to-face employees in the company. The SPD chairmen Saskia Esken and Norbert Walter-Borjans announced after a meeting of the presidium that this will now be initiated by the federal government in the cabinet meeting. The SPD assumes that the federal cabinet as a whole will both adopt stricter corona rules through federal law and approve an ordinance on the obligation to test offers in companies. Esken and co-party leader Walter-Borjans announced that the cabinet would take note of an ordinance from Labor Minister Hubertus Heil, with which mandatory test offers would be established in companies. This was discussed with the federal states and parliamentary groups, and the federal cabinet was also &#8220;in agreement on these objectives,&#8221; said Esken.</p>
<h2>Usage does not have to be documented</h2>
<p>The draft of the Ministerial Ordinance is based on the <em>ARD capital studio</em> in front. There should therefore not be any obligation to test for employees. It is only about the test offer obligation for companies. Companies also do not have to document whether the employees actually use the tests. And: Companies that have been badly hit by the Corona crisis can count the expenses for the tests as a cost item for the bridging aid. First of all, every employee should receive one test per week. If you have a lot of contacts, you should get two tests. All in all, the regulation is not as strict as many business associations fear. And yet there is criticism, for example from the employers&#8217; association BDA. Managing Director Steffen Kampeter criticizes: The obligation to test leads to more bureaucracy and discredits the voluntary commitment of companies. It is of little consolation if the test bureaucracy that has now been introduced does not implement all of the proposed measures.</p>
<h2>Stricter rules, more childhood sick days</h2>
<p>The ministerial coordination is currently ongoing, tomorrow the federal cabinet is expected to approve the measure. According to the SPD boss Esken, the generally stricter corona rules that are also to be decided include a binding emergency brake, according to which &#8220;all openings must be withdrawn&#8221; if the infection value exceeds 100. There are &#8220;exit restrictions to be provided&#8221;. It was also agreed to increase the number of days paid for children&#8217;s illnesses per parent from the current 20 to 30 days. With a view to resistance in the Union parliamentary group to these new regulations, Esken said: &#8220;It must now be our most important goal to protect the health of people and the employees in hospitals&#8221;. The situation in the intensive care units is particularly dramatic, said the SPD leader.</p>
<h2>Compulsory tests should relieve the economy</h2>
<p>In view of the negative attitude of some Union politicians to mandatory test offers in companies, Walter-Borjans warned that these politicians should also be aware that this would &#8220;avert a complete lockdown&#8221; for the economy. He also referred to ongoing discussions about extending the bridging allowances for businesses as well as in favor of downtown businesses. The SPD parliamentary group is also obviously behind the planned measures. &#8220;We support a rapid emergency brake in the Infection Protection Act, which formulates the measures precisely and bindingly,&#8221; said parliamentary group vice-president Dirk Wiese of the AFP news agency. The current inconsistencies in protective measures must be overcome. Wiese also pushed for a nationwide test obligation for employers, &#8220;because it is becoming more and more obvious that it does not work across the board without pressure&#8221;.</p>
<h2>Advance by the Minister of Labor</h2>
<p>With his plans for a mandatory test offer at the workplace, Federal Labor Minister Hubertus Heil had accelerated the discussion. Encouragement for the move came from the union side, among others. Reiner Hoffmann, chairman of the German trade union federation (DGB), told the newspapers of the &#8220;Funke Mediengruppe&#8221; that there had to be a test obligation for employers: &#8220;It is simply not understandable why people in the private sector have been restricting themselves to their basic rights for over a year , but the rules for employers are still as smooth as butter. &#8221; The Union and employers have so far refused to test. Economics minister Peter Altmaier recently emphasized that he relied on the voluntary nature of the companies that had agreed to expand their test offer. According to a report by &#8220;Spiegel&#8221;, the Federal Ministry of Economics is said to have given way in the meantime. It was said that one would turn around. The departmental coordination is ongoing to clarify the final details. With information from Tobias Betz, ARD capital studio</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">2581</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>