Illustration According to the RT , a link to a pornographic website was recently discovered in a textbook used to teach Ukrainian to 10th graders since 2018. Ukrainian children start school at the age of six. By the 10th grade, most of the students were 16 years old. “It’s not clear if this is a joke or a hoax. But can you imagine how many children we have raised in the last three years with such a book?”, said Prosecutor General Irina Venediktova angrily, adding that prosecutors are conducting the investigation. investigate the case. According to local media, the person who discovered the error in the textbook was the author Aleksandr Avramenko. This famous education expert took to Facebook to complain about the slowness of the Ukrainian authorities. He said the cybersecurity agency was slow to respond when he called for the blocking of pornographic websites linked to in textbooks. Regarding his error, Avramenko explained that when writing the book, he cited some documents from the website that was once the official portal of a district in the Kirovograd Region of Ukraine. Because of quoting information, Mr. Avramenko must specify the link according to copyright law. When the textbook was published in 2018, the site still belonged to the Novomyrhorod district. But last year, the website domain was transferred to a new owner. The person then started turning the site into a dark web, Avramenko stressed, adding that “this metamorphosis was just discovered.” The author suggested that the dark web scandal could have been a provocation by some unknown opponents who were jealous of his success. “Why is this happening to my book? This year, I submitted four textbooks to different competitions and all of them won first place, far ahead of the competitors. Could this be the reason? Unfortunately, I also have enemies,” Avramenko wrote. However, the author does not rule out the possibility that this is simply a coincidence. Currently, the Ukrainian investigative agency has not confirmed or denied the author’s allegations.

Twitter icon on mobile phone and tablet screens. Photo: AFP/VNA Since March, Russia’s Communications Supervision Agency (Roskomnadzor) has reduced the transmission speed of Twitter in Russia because the social network did not urgently remove banned content, and warned to block all activities. of this platform on the territory of Russia. According to Roskomnadzor, there are thousands of banned content on Twitter, such as suicide instructions, inciting suicide, materials with sexually explicit images of minors, or information on drug preparation and use. .. Twitter has denied allegations that allow users to take advantage of this social networking platform to incite illegal acts, asserting that Twitter has a “zero tolerance” policy for child sexual abuse. as well as behavior that encourages suicide or self-harm. According to Roskomnadzor, since March, Twitter has removed 91% of banned content, but still hundreds of posts are showing. In recent months, Russia has tightened regulations aimed at controlling technology and social media corporations. Two days ago, a Russian court fined Google “tech giant” 4 million rubles ($54,540) for not removing content on the country’s banned list.

However, livestream has become a “trend” pursued by many people, but not all “creators” create value. Bullshit, vulgar content is posted by many vloggers defiantly to attract attention and receive donations (money and gifts) from viewers. On major live-streaming platforms in the country of billions of people, such as Bilibili, Douyin, and Kuaishou, it is not difficult for viewers to come across images of female vloggers dressed in revealing, offensive clothing and performing erotic acts. Many streamers are banned from showing off their bodies or showing sexual acts to receive donations. Showing off, deceiving viewers Many live broadcast studios often hack the number of followers to create credibility, attract viewers so that they are willing to donate money. The account holders also deliberately fabricated sensational stories, creating conflicts with others to attract viewers of their livestream. “Poor students borrow more than 100,000 yuan to reward female streamers in Nanjing”, “16-year-old teenager rewards female streamers with 1.58 million yuan for 3 months”, “Male cashier appropriated more than 48 million yuan to donate to the live broadcast room”, a series of negative news related to direct money rewards through livestream has caused many controversial streams in the Chinese online community. On May 17, Kuaishou posted a notice saying that live streamer Yin Shihang, an account holder with 8 million followers, had been banned from the platform for “sensational marketing”, “vulgar performances” and false advertising during the livestream on May 15. Initially, Yin introduced to live stream his marriage proposal with girlfriend Tao Lulu. Millions of people watched to witness the special moment of the popular streamer. In the end, he tricked the audience by turning the broadcast into a 5-hour sales show. Yin Shihang was banned from broadcasting when tricking viewers into the livestream. Various live broadcasting platforms are working to strengthen control over violations. Kuaishou has issued a special regulatory notice on “Scripting, Acting and Purchases”, which bans accounts or imposes fines on those who take advantage of family conflicts and other factors unrelated to the issue. sell merchandise to entice fans to buy. In June 2020, Douyin issued a new rule that allows minors to privately award rewards after verification and can be fully refunded. In April 2021, Douyin revealed that a total of 36,000 minors had been refunded in 11 months, with an average refund time of 19.7 hours. At the end of November 2020, the State Administration of Radio, Film and Television of China issued a notice on strengthening the management of livestream and live broadcast of e-commerce. In which, methods such as facial recognition are applied to implement real-name management for broadcasters and users. The new rule also limits the number of rewards users can receive by time, daily and monthly, if there are too many rewards, there will be a reminder message and the reward function will be paused if the limit is exceeded.

Facial recognition technology. Photo: https://towardsdatascience.com/ According to the Vietnam News Agency correspondent in Ottawa, in a recent speech to the Canadian House of Representatives, Daniel Therrien, Canada’s Privacy Commissioner, said that bill C-11 is not enough to protect people from identity technology. face and need to include “significant modifications”. This measure proposes to amend private sector privacy laws. Regarding facial recognition technology, Mr. Therrien mentioned US technology company Clearview AI. In February 2021, Daniel Therrien’s office, along with three provincial privacy commissioners, concluded that Clearview AI violated Canadian privacy laws by providing facial recognition software. for the police. What’s interesting is that Clearview AI’s (New York-based) software works by comparing photos with a massive stockpile of billions of photos the company has amassed, collected from various sources. popular social media sites without the consent of individuals. “While we found that Clearview’s practices violated Canadian privacy laws, the company refused to follow our recommendations, such as removing photos of Canadians,” said Mr Therrien. Meanwhile, the new administrative penalty regime in C-11 is not applied to such violations of the law. Therrien noted that the Office of the Privacy Commissioner of Canada is investigating whether online website Pornhub and its parent company MindGeek (based in Montreal) violated Canadians’ privacy rights. MindGeek is accused of regularly sharing videos of child pornography and sexual assault, as well as content that was filmed/or posted without the subject’s consent. Within the framework of the bill, for the most serious violations, fines could be up to 5% of revenue or CAD 25 million (whichever is greater). These measures have been assessed by Canada’s Department of Innovation, Science and Economic Development as the strongest penalty framework among the world’s Group of Seven (G7) privacy laws. Therrien recommends that when there is a conflict between commercial goals and protecting privacy, the privacy of Canadians should take precedence.

App Store currently has more than 4.3 million apps and games serving Apple’s mobile platform. In addition, “Apple” also revealed, its anti-fraud platform has also prevented and removed nearly 1 million applications that are potentially risky or vulnerable to attack from the App Store. Parallel to the data release, Apple also describes how to combat fraud in the online application market, highlighting the need for application censorship and tools powerful enough to deal with behavior. cheating in ratings and reviews of the app. The company also closely monitors developers’ accounts for misconduct. Apple says 180,000 developers successfully launch new apps on the App Store in 2020. However, during the same time period, nearly a million new apps and one million “problematic” updates. Was rejected. Of these, more than 48,000 cases were blocked because of hidden features or not enough paperwork required. Approximately 150,000 cases were rejected for causing misleading, spreading junk information or copying piracy. Apple also said it has wiped out 215,000 privacy-violating apps, including asking users to provide more information than necessary and using the collected information for the wrong purpose. Apple also removed more than 250 million ratings and reviews for not meeting content censorship guidelines. The US technology giant also warned of a new wave of “crime” on app stores. Just over the past month, they’ve had to deal with a bunch of conversion-functional apps after they have been approved for release. Among these, the most popular are applications that solicit money, distribute pornography, and gambling applications. With violations discovered, a total of 470,000 developer accounts on the App Store were removed. Apple also rejected 205,000 newly registered accounts due to concerns of fraud.

CEO Tim Cook speaks at WWDC 2018 (Image: Getty Images) This is the first time Apple publish this data. It is a sign of “defective apple” becoming more transparent in the process of approving and rejecting iPhone applications under pressure from many countries. Thanks to the application review system, comparing with the App Store regulatory list, the company can keep iPhone users safe from fraud, malware or poor experience. Apple also published some notable figures for 2020. Accordingly, the manufacturer Iphone rejected nearly 1 million applications submitted for the first time; deny nearly 1 million application updates. 48,000 applications removed due to use of “hidden or unreported features”; 150,000 applications removed for spam or other application copying; 215,000 apps removed for collecting too much user data or violating privacy; 95,000 applications were removed due to phishing, usually they change to other types of applications such as gambling, porn. 470,000 accounts disabled from the developer program for phishing. Additionally, last month, Apple declined 3.2 million app downloads using an enterprise license. This is how large businesses often use to circumvent the App Store law to install internal apps on employees’ iPhones. Currently, the lawsuit between Apple and Epic Games is taking place. Game maker Fortnite denounces the App Store as a “closed garden”, hurting developers, and Apple discriminates against many. Epic Games also confirmed that Apple’s process is not perfect, sometimes approving malware. Apple employees themselves have admitted their process is not good enough to prevent scams. At the trial, Apple said, combining 500 automated reviewers and testers to review nearly 5 million applications per year, from 2017 to 2019 (updates included), the rate from declined from 33% to 36%. The flaws are too small for the size of the App Store. Apple sees the App Store as a fundamental, irreplaceable part of its business. This is the only way for users to install software on the iPhone. Apple’s attorney argued that if users let users download apps from outside the App Store the way Android is doing, they would be at risk of security. Apple doesn’t want to be Android. Du Lam (According to CNBC)

Many people commented that the hit made them disappointed because it was too offensive. The dance is said to have too many erotic moves. CBS takes responsibility for broadcasting a performance unsuitable for children.

“I was offended before the Megan Stallion & Cardi B show. The song transcends sexual boundaries, it promotes pornography and is not suitable for children,” Rolling Stone citation email sent to FCC.

Cardi B’s performance has been repeatedly criticized.

According to the InsiderA resident in Virginia said she was anxious for the children to see the show. She said it was “disgusting, scared” when she watched the show.

Others attacked the CBS channel, calling for the television network to stop broadcasting vulgar content. Another California resident said it would take legal action if CBS continues to distribute pornography.

Before that, when the performance was shown on CBS, many people criticized the performance. Conservative activist and politician Candace Owens said: “The performance of Cardi B and Megan Thee Stallion is toxic to young people.”

The US National Center for Sexual Exploitation criticized CBS and the Grammy Awards organizers for the performance. “CBS is promoting pornography and striptease in front of an American audience, including children just because they want to increase ratings,” said Dawn Hawkins, the center’s senior vice president and chief executive officer.

When Cardi B first released the MV, James P. Bradley, a candidate for the US Senate, spoke WAP offend others. Rapper CeeLo Green once again said this is music that is personally and morally disappointing.