Expelled from the party after more than two years of retirement

According to Liaoning Provincial Commission for Discipline InspectionAccording to the report, after investigation, Qi Yumin lost his ideals and beliefs. Ignore party discipline and state laws and oppose organizational censorshipViolating the spirit of the eight central regulations, accepting gift money that may affect the fair execution of official duties, arranging and using official vehicles in violation of regulations; violating the rules of procedure and violating regulations to determine major issues, concealing personal matters, and failing to truthfully explain the issues when organizing letter inquiries. Use power to seek benefits for others in the selection and appointment of cadres;Borrow money from management and service targets, run business in violation of regulations, get paid for part-time jobs in violation of regulations, and engage in money-and-color transactions; Dereliction of duty and responsibility for the false reporting of profit issues of Brilliance Group; dereliction of control and education of spouses and children; use of the convenience of the position to seek benefits for others and request and illegally accept property;Use the convenience of the position to embezzle public funds to others for profit-making activities; Abuse of power has caused serious losses to state-owned companies and caused heavy losses to national interests.

Qi Yumin seriously violated the party’s political discipline, organizational discipline, integrity discipline, work discipline, and life discipline, constituted a violation of the law and was suspected of crimes of bribery, embezzlement of public funds, and abuse of power by state-owned company personnel. They still do not converge or close their hands after the university, their nature is bad, and the circumstances are serious. They should be dealt with seriously. In accordance with the “Chinese Communist Party Disciplinary Sanctions Regulations”, “The Supervision Law of the People’s Republic of China”, “The Law of the People’s Republic of China on Governmental Sanctions of Public Officials” and other relevant regulations, the Provincial Disciplinary Committee Standing Committee meeting researched and reported to the Provincial Party Committee for approval, and decided to give Qi Yumin expelled from the party; Cancel the treatment they enjoy in accordance with the regulations; collect their income from violations of discipline and law; transfer their suspected crimes to the procuratorial organ for review and prosecution in accordance with the law, and transfer the property involved together.

On December 4 last year, the Central Commission for Discipline Inspection and the State Supervision Commission issued a notice stating that according to the Liaoning Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection, the former party secretary and chairman of Brilliance Automobile Group Holdings Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Brilliance Group”) Qi Yumin was suspected of serious violations of discipline and law. , Is currently undergoing disciplinary review and supervision and investigation.

According to the official resume, Qi Yumin was born in January 1959. After graduating from Shaanxi Institute of Mechanical Engineering in 1982, he joined Dalian Heavy Machinery Factory and served as deputy director and director of the Economic Planning Department. In 1995, he served as the deputy director of Dazhong Group Corporation. Manager, served as general manager of Dazhong Group Corporation in 1998.

In 2000, Qi Yumin served as chairman and general manager of Dalian Heavy Industry Group Co., Ltd., and the following year as chairman and general manager of Dalian Heavy Industry Lifting Group Co., Ltd. In 2004, Qi Yumin served as the deputy mayor of Dalian.

At the end of December 2005, Qi Yumin was transferred to Brilliance Group as the party secretary and chairman of the board. Many years later, Qi Yumin said frankly in an interview with the media, “It was sudden, very tragic, ignorant and helpless to get the transfer order.” It is reported that the Brilliance Group at the time was still in the aftershocks of the Yangrong incident. The middle-level lost dealers fled and suffered serious losses. Qi Yumin, who arrived at that time, was once regarded as the “fire-fighting captain.”

Qi Yumin (Image source: Visual China)

After that, Qi Yumin cashed out on the capital market through Brilliance’s capital operation team, realizing the supplement to Brilliance’s capital. According to the Securities Daily, Qi Yumin clearly stated in an exclusive interview at the company’s 10th anniversary meeting: “Brilliance Auto’s development over the years has mostly relied on its own financing. Therefore, the financing capabilities of the capital market and Brilliance’s capital The multi-channel financing of development by the market is the key support for the development of independent brands.”

Qi Yumin also allowed Brilliance to obtain technical support through cooperation with BMW.

The industry generally believes that in the ten years of cooperation with BMW, Brilliance can not only lie down and make money, but also actually taste the sweetness of “using the market for technology”.However, Brilliance, whose development capability is too weak, has been unable to digest BMW’s technology, and its sales in its independent sector have also been declining, and its market share has been shrinking..

According to the Beijing News, in 2015, Brilliance Zhonghua’s small SUV Zhonghua V3 was officially launched. At that time, Qi Yumin set a goal: China V3 will be a pattern changer in China’s small SUV market;He repeatedly stated, “Before I retire, I must make Brilliance into the Fortune 500.”However, China V3 did not realize Qi Yumin’s sustenance. In 2017 and 2018, the sales of China V3 declined year after year, with annual sales of 36,000 and 12,500, respectively, down 52% and 65.27% year-on-year..

Finally, on October 11, 2018, at the 15th anniversary celebration of BMW Brilliance, Brilliance Group and BMW Group jointly announced that Brilliance Group intends to sell 25% of the shares in BMW Brilliance to BMW Group by 2022, the transaction price is RMB 29 billion yuan,BMW Brilliance will become the first vehicle joint venture company controlled by a foreign party. This has caused Qi Yumin to suffer from public controversy.

Qi Yumin later revealed when he was a guest on CCTV that the prerequisite for BMW’s negotiations at the time was a 75% share ratio, and everything could be discussed, but the share ratio could not be discussed. As a result, Brilliance had to negotiate two agreements with the other party: First, to make the pie of the joint venture bigger, at least to double it, “otherwise it would be meaningless to liberalize the equity ratio.” In addition, the shareholders of both parties have to obtain greater economic benefits,”Three and a half years later, Brilliance has changed from 50 to 25, but the benefits of 25 must be greater than the current 50.”.

On April 1, 2019, when he retired from Brilliance Group, Qi Yumin said with emotion, “The past was cleared, love and hate are at will, I hope Brilliance will always be well”. But now, Qi Yumin and Brilliance are both running counter to the vision.

Brilliance Group went bankrupt and reorganized last year

According to the official website of Brilliance Group, the company has 4 listed companies (Brilliance China Automotive Holdings Co., Ltd., Shanghai Shenhua Holdings Co., Ltd., Jinbei Automobile Co., Ltd., and Xinchen China Power Holdings Co., Ltd.), and more than 160 wholly-owned, holding and shareholding companies the company. There are 47,000 employees,Total assets exceed 190 billion yuan.

Last year, Brilliance had many operating problems. Since July last year,Brilliance Group was caught in a debt turmoil, was exposed to 100 billion yuan in debt, and many equity shares were frozen. In August, Dagong International and Oriental Jincheng successively included Brilliance Group and its multiple bonds on the rating watch list. In September, both Orient Jincheng and Dagong International downgraded Brilliance Group’s main credit rating, among which Dongfang Jincheng downgraded to AA+ and Dagong International directly downgraded it to AA. On October 16, Oriental Jincheng once again downgraded Brilliance Group’s main credit rating to AA-. On October 21, Dagong International downgraded the main credit rating of Brilliance Group to A+.

On November 16 of that year, Brilliance Group disclosed thatThe company has constituted a total debt default amount of 6.5 billion yuan and overdue interest amount of 144 million yuan. Due to the shortage of corporate funds, the renewal credit approval has not been completed, resulting in failure to repay. Then on November 20, the Shenyang Intermediate People’s Court ruled to accept the creditor personality Zhizhi Automobile Technology Co., Ltd.’s application for reorganization of Brilliance Group.Brilliance Group officially entered the bankruptcy reorganization process.

The court’s ruling stated that the assets of Brilliance Group were insufficient to pay off all its debts, and that it had bankruptcy reasons stipulated in the Corporate Bankruptcy Law. But at the same time, the group has the value and possibility of salvation, and the necessity and feasibility of reorganization.

For driving to this position, according to the relevant person in charge of the Liaoning Provincial SASAC,Brilliance Group’s long-term poor operation and management, its own brands have been in a state of loss, and the debt ratio remains high. Since 2018, the Liaoning Provincial Government and relevant departments have been working hard to help Brilliance Group solve its cash flow problems, but its debt problems have been accumulated. This year, affected by the new crown pneumonia epidemic, the operating conditions of Brilliance Group’s own brands have further deteriorated, and long-term accumulated debt problems have erupted. According to the semi-annual report of Brilliance Group this year, the total liabilities at the group level are 52.376 billion yuan, the debt-to-asset ratio exceeds 110%, and the financing capacity is lost. In order to solve the debt problem, the relevant parties established the Brilliance Group Bank Debt Committee to seek debt reconciliation, but failed.

On the day that Brilliance Group officially entered the bankruptcy and reorganization process, the China Securities Regulatory Commission stated,Special inspections have been carried out on Brilliance Automobile Group in accordance with the law, the administrative supervision measures of issuing warning letters have been taken against Brilliance Group, and it has been decided to file an investigation for suspected violations of information disclosure., Conduct simultaneous inspections of intermediaries involved in the Brilliance Group’s bonds, and strictly investigate and deal with violations of laws and regulations.

Edit| Sun Zhicheng Xiao Yong

Proofreading| Lu Xiangyong

Daily Economic News Comprehensive public information, CCTV news, Beijing News, Securities Daily, etc.

Wen|Wang Xin

Edit | Take Shiyang

After taking the helm of Brilliance Group for 13 years, in April 2019, when receiving the retirement notice, Qi Yumin once left a message in the circle of friends: “Life is short, the past is cleared.” Last year, two weeks after Brilliance Group went into bankruptcy and reorganization, Qi Yumin was officially dismissed and investigated. Many people attribute his investigation to the continuous financial crisis of Brilliance Group in the second half of 2020.

Now, Qi Yumin, who has retired for two years, has not returned to his hometown of Xi’an as expected to live his longing for “Going Back to the Garden”. What he has to face is a serious accountability-due to the dereliction of duty in reporting the profits of Brilliance Group during his tenure, he was expelled from the party and collected illegal gains.

On June 15th, with the approval of the Liaoning Provincial Party Committee, the Liaoning Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection conducted an investigation and investigation on the suspected 10 serious violations of discipline and law by Qi Yumin, chairman and president of Brilliance Automobile Group Holdings Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as “Brilliance Group”). .

After investigation, Qi Yumin seriously violated the party’s political discipline, organizational discipline, integrity discipline, work discipline, and life discipline, constituted a violation of the law and was suspected of crimes of bribery, embezzlement of public funds, and crimes of abuse of power by state-owned company personnel. Research by the Standing Committee of the Provincial Commission for Discipline Inspection And reported to the provincial party committee for approval, decided to give Qi Yumin expelled from the party; cancel the treatment he enjoyed according to regulations; collect his illegal income; transfer his suspected crime to the procuratorial organ for review and prosecution in accordance with the law, and the property involved is also transferred.

During his 13 years as chairman of Brilliance Group, Qi Yumin left a lot of controversy. In the past 13 years, Brilliance Group relied on a joint venture with BMW, and its own brands eventually fell out of the mainstream market. Since then, Brilliance Group, which has lost its hematopoietic ability, entered the bankruptcy reorganization process at the end of last year, and its Hong Kong-listed company Brilliance China (01114.hk) has fallen into rumors of “privatization”.

Qi Yumin: In the past, it could not be cleared

Some people say that Qi Yumin is different from other Autobots. He never wanted to enter the auto industry.

Looking at his work experience, Qi Yumin has a complete resume of a state-owned enterprise. From 1982 to 2004, a planner from Dalian Heavy Machinery Factory has been the chairman and general manager of Dazhong, Crane Group. In 2004, he served as Deputy Mayor of Dalian Municipal People’s Government. Since 2005, he has been in charge of Brilliance Group for 13 years until retirement.

“I came to Brilliance in a daze. After I came, I really felt like I fell into a fire pit.” Qi Yumin said when he just took over the Brilliance Group.

At that time, the Brilliance Group, which was transformed from a privately-owned company to a state-owned holding company, experienced an unprecedented four-year era of great turbulence and chaos, and its development was in trouble. At this time, Brilliance Auto was in a huge loss for three years, unable to pay wages, and still owed the supplier 1 billion yuan in payment. Due to poor efficiency, there was a serious loss of personnel. The first thing Qi Yumin did was to go to the bank to borrow money everywhere, and in just 5 days he took a loan of 700 million yuan to open his salary, repay the arrears, reorganized parts suppliers, launched the Junjie model, and successfully raised 1.5 billion yuan in Hong Kong. , To solve the urgent need of Brilliance Auto.

Although Qi Yumin had hoped to make a breakthrough in the self-owned brand sector, many attempts were unsuccessful. After years of decline in the technical strength and sales performance of Brilliance’s independent business, it ranked bottom among large state-owned auto companies.

Public data shows that the sales of Brilliance’s own brands have been declining year by year in the past three years. In 2018, Brilliance Automotive’s overall sales volume was 89,400, a year-on-year decline of 31.7%, ranking bottom. In 2019, Brilliance Auto’s sales volume was 49,100. In 2020, Brilliance Auto’s sales slashed again to only 22,800 units, ranking bottom among state-owned auto companies again.

According to the data released by the Passenger Association, in 2020, coupled with the impact of the epidemic, Brilliance China, which had a high-light moment, suspended production and shifts, and its annual sales were even zero. Huasong MPV models also encountered the same dilemma.

The explanation for the decline in sales of independent brands by the executives of Brilliance Auto has always been that there are shortcomings in terms of channels and brand power. “Because the market operation cannot keep up with the product, the network system is relatively fragile and cannot provide support for the current sales target.”

In fact, Brilliance Auto was once a disruptor in the auto industry, aggressively and boldly experimenting with the shareholding system and the bankruptcy system.

In the era of Yangrong, Brilliance took three steps: in 1989, the Jinbei opened the way to introduce technology from Toyota and other companies; in 1992, Jinbei GM and 2003, BMW Brilliance launched a joint venture model; in 2000, China Motor launched its own autonomy. The prelude to research and development.

In addition, Brilliance International negotiated with Rover of the United Kingdom and Renault of France to conspire to acquire Shaanxi Qinchuan. However, due to the “Rover Project” in the later period, Yang Rong and the government had conflicts over the ownership of Brilliance. After the breakdown of the negotiations, Yang Rong went to the United States in 2002 and did not return. The Liaoning Provincial Party Committee dispatched a working team to Brilliance to conduct a comprehensive inventory of Brilliance’s assets, and thus took back control of Brilliance.

At present, as a state-owned enterprise in Liaoning Province, Brilliance Group directly or indirectly controls and participates in four listed companies, and through its listed company Brilliance China and BMW jointly established BMW Brilliance, which has its own brands Zhonghua, Jinbei, Huasong and BMW Brilliance, Two joint venture brands of Brilliance Renault.

But after 2002, Brilliance suffered from the “common problems of large state-owned enterprises”: product system confusion, lack of pillar models, excessive reliance on joint ventures, and the escape of a large number of talents and dealers caused Brilliance’s mid-level failure, which has not changed so far.

From a historical perspective, Brilliance Auto has lost many good opportunities, including the Rover project (termination of compensation), Renault domestic project (termination of compensation), Chevrolet SUV, domestic pickup project (integrated by SAIC GM), and joint venture projects in BMW China also lost the right to speak.

In the capital market, Brilliance has planned many plans, including adding some new listing platforms, but they have not been realized so far, including the listing of Shenyang special vehicles. In 2015, Brilliance had a plan to go public in two years, but it failed to materialize. As the No. 1 Jinbei brand in China, and even China Motors, which was once comparable to the international brands, it gradually became silent after news of wage arrears, suspension of production, and long vacations came out.

Earlier, some Brilliance insiders told AI Finance and Economics that the government-based management and the officialization of personnel are the fundamental reason for the decline of state-owned auto companies.

A 1 billion bond default triggers bankruptcy and reorganization

Everything is so sudden, Brilliance Group is “bankrupted”.

As Brilliance Group’s 1 billion private placement debt “17 Huaqi 05” expired on October 23, 2020 and failed to be paid on schedule, Brilliance Automotive was sold by its supplier, Gezhi Automotive Technology Co., Ltd. in Liaoning. The Intermediate People’s Court of Shenyang City in the province filed for bankruptcy and reorganization.

Since Brilliance Group has constituted a debt default amount of 6.5 billion yuan, the total amount of overdue interest is 144 million yuan. Brilliance was unable to repay due to tight funds.

On November 20, 2020, the Shenyang Intermediate People’s Court ruled to accept the creditor’s application for reorganization of Brilliance Auto Group, marking that Brilliance Group has officially entered the bankruptcy reorganization process. The reorganization only involves the self-owned brand sector of the group’s headquarters, and does not involve the group’s listed companies and joint ventures with BMW and Renault.

Since the second half of last year, problems such as the collapse of bonds, high debt levels, freezing of equity, zero sales, and decline of independent brands have continued to emerge. Brilliance Auto has undoubtedly become a brand that is on the verge of life and death.

“If I caught a cold, I entered the morgue.” This is the intuitive feeling of the outside world about Brilliance Automobile’s sullenness.

Who knows, such a billion-dollar giant can’t pay 1 billion private debts, and the fundamental problem is no longer an overnight disaster. Behind this, the assets of Brilliance Group are not healthy.

According to statistics, in the three years from 2017 to 2019, the total liabilities of Brilliance Automotive Group were 114.256 billion yuan, 119.585 billion yuan and 144.781 billion yuan respectively; and the asset-liability ratios for the three years were 70.84%, 69.93% and 74.11% respectively. .

In the first half of 2020, the total liabilities of Brilliance Group have reached 132.844 billion yuan. After deducting goodwill and intangible assets, the asset-liability ratio is 71.4%. In addition, as of October last year, Brilliance Auto had issued 34 bonds and 14 remaining bonds, with a total outstanding bond balance of 16.2 billion yuan.

In September of that year, Qi Kai, the vice president of Brilliance Automobile Group Holding Co., Ltd., who had just taken office, said in an interview that, in terms of finance, Brilliance Group did encounter the problem of shortage of funds and liquidity, but “Brilliance Group sits on 170 billion assets. , The debt is more than 120 billion, and the debt ratio is about 70%.” Therefore, “as a production and operation enterprise, the debt and assets are relatively reasonable, and the debt-to-asset ratio is at the middle level of the industry.”

While explaining the rationality of assets and liabilities, while exporting to the market confidence in boosting the sales of its own brands, Qi Kai’s presence did not divert everyone’s worries about the insolvency of Brilliance Group.

The latest news is that in May 2021, Brilliance Group issued a reorganization progress announcement stating that as of May 19, 2021, the administrator has received a total of 5,986 creditors to declare claims, and the total amount of claims is 53.673 billion yuan, of which the administrator The total amount determined in the preliminary investigation was RMB 39.1 billion.

Over-reliance on BMW’s own brand is weak

“I know that many people scold me for not engaging in self-owned brands, but in fact, if others are better than you, they are better than you. You have to be brave enough to admit it.” Qi Yumin said in an interview with the media in 2017.

The focus on joint ventures, the abandonment of autonomy, the lack of technical input, and the lack of pillar models have left hidden dangers for the decline of Brilliance Auto.

Critics believe that Qi Yumin’s “not enterprising” on products and his “ignorant” to the group are the important reasons for the decline of Brilliance.

“The money earned from BMW Brilliance will be returned to Brilliance’s independent business.” Qi Yumin said, “If you haven’t learned technology in 30 years, China should reflect on it. My reflection is that foreign teachers did not teach well and Chinese students did not learn well. .”

So Qi Yumin chose a shortcut: use joint ventures to feed back independence. Qi Yumin intends to use the “big plane” to provide power-technology comes from BMW, and then high technology to support his own brand, in addition to continue to integrate the automotive industry and capital markets, and finally corporate culture and management-internationalization, modernization, and marketization . Two tail wings: one is the engine and the other is diversified, including the capital market.

“Our proposition is a healthy interaction between the financial market and the automobile industry. The reason why I set up a capital company is to develop an independent industry. 100% of the money I financed and the return on investment I earn are invested in the two independent brands of Zhonghua and Jinbei. Development.” Qi Yumin said.

It is a pity that things go against people’s wishes.

BMW Brilliance almost supported the entire Brilliance Group and continued to provide blood transfusions for Brilliance, while Brilliance’s own brands have almost stagnated.

Since 2011, Brilliance China’s annual operating income has been maintained at 5-6 billion yuan, but its net profit has ranged from 1.8 billion to 5.3 billion yuan. At the same time, BMW Brilliance provides annual profits of Brilliance China of RMB 1.7-5.5 billion, accounting for 94.9% -119.6%. In the five years from 2015 to 2019, if the profit of BMW Brilliance is excluded, Brilliance Auto has been at a loss, with a cumulative loss of 3.484 billion yuan.

In 2018, the 15th anniversary of BMW Brilliance, BMW acquired 25% of the shares of BMW Brilliance for 3.6 billion euros, with a shareholding ratio of 75%, which caused an uproar in the industry.

Many people worry that when the shareholders of BMW Brilliance complete the equity change, it may be the beginning of the loss of Brilliance China. It is also said that Brilliance Auto is likely to be completely reduced to BMW’s foundry.

At that time, Qi Yumin responded to the change in share ratio on TV: “Hong Kong’s listed companies are mainly supported by BMW Brilliance. As soon as the share ratio is released, the capital market will react soon, but they only know that Brilliance will leave BMW and it will be over. Since the 75% share ratio is nothing to talk about, then I have to talk about other benefits. I have limited two, one is to ask the joint venture to make the cake bigger and at least double it, otherwise it would be meaningless to liberalize the share ratio. The second is that the shareholders of both parties need to obtain greater economic benefits. Even if Brilliance’s equity ratio changes from 50% to 25% in three years, the interest at that time must be greater than the current 50% equity ratio.”

On February 3 this year, Brilliance China’s stock changed, and even the stock price of the same automobile Jiefang soared. There are rumors that FAW Group will acquire the shares of Brilliance China. The transaction value is about 7.2 billion U.S. dollars (about 46.7 billion yuan) in an attempt to privatize Brilliance. , But soon, Brilliance China responded: “I don’t know the source of the information contained in the media report.”

At present, this is the biggest good news for Brilliance Group in the process of bankruptcy and reorganization.

This article was originally produced by AI Finance and Economics, an account of “Finance World” Weekly. Please do not reprint it on any channel or platform without permission. Offenders must be investigated.

Three Baltic states, Estonia, Latvia and Lithuania, have expelled a total of four Russian diplomats to show solidarity with the Czech Republic (Czech) in diplomatic retaliation for alleged Russian secret involvement. ammunition warehouse explosions in Czech, news agency AFP said. On April 17, the Czech Republic accused the Russian Secret Service of being behind a fatal explosion at an arsenal in eastern Czechs in 2014 and thus expelled 18 Russian diplomats. This decision led to a series of “reciprocal” responses between Prague and Moscow. The Czech Republic has called on allies in the European Union (EU) and the North Atlantic Treaty Bloc (NATO) to unite and support the decision of the Prague government. On April 23, Lithuanian Foreign Minister Gabrielius Landsbergis announced his decision to expel two staff of the Russian Embassy in Vilnius for “behavior inconsistent with diplomatic status” and ordered them to leave Lithuania within seven days. Russian Embassy in Riga (Latvia). Photo: TASS The Lithuanian Foreign Ministry stressed that “this decision shows our solidarity (ie the Vilnius government) with our ally after an unprecedented and dangerous incident in the Czech Republic”. Lithuania also offered to support the Czech Embassy in Moscow in carrying out its functions after Czech diplomats were expelled by Russia. The Russian Foreign Ministry announced that by May 31st, the Russian Embassy in Prague and the Czech Embassy in Moscow will only maintain 7 diplomatic staff, 25 technical and administrative staff, as well as right to hire up to 19 employees who are nationals of the host country. Thus, the number of Czech diplomats in Moscow must be reduced by 16, while the number of Russian diplomats in Prague is only one-sixth of the current number. On the same day 23-4, Latvian Foreign Minister Edgars Rinkevics announced the expulsion of a staff member of the Russian Embassy in Riga. The Latvian Foreign Ministry explained that this was a move to show “solidarity with the Czech”, based on “information provided by Latvian authorities” and was made after consulting with allies. EU and NATO. And the Estonian Foreign Ministry announced the expulsion of a Russian diplomat who the Tallinn government said was behaving inconsistent with diplomatic principles. Estonia emphasized that it was “an expression of solidarity with the Czechs” and criticized the actions of the Russian secret service as the Czech accused it of being “unacceptable”. In response to the decision of the Latvian Foreign Ministry, the Russian Embassy in Riga said that this “unfriendly action” would “have the most negative impact on the development of Russian-Latvian relations”. The Russian diplomatic delegation also announced that Moscow would soon take measures to respond, according to the news agency TASS . The Russian embassy in Tallinn was also dissatisfied by Estonia’s decision, saying that the decision to expel Russian diplomats could undermine efforts to improve Russia-Estonian relations. The Russian diplomatic delegation to Lithuania does not appear to have commented on the decision of the Vilnius government yet. Before the three Baltic countries, Slovakia expelled three members of the Russian Embassy in Bratislava to show solidarity with its neighbor Czech.

To show solidarity with neighboring Czech Republic (Czech), Slovakia expelled three Russian diplomats, the news agency. TASS reporting. Citing sources from Slovak media on April 22, TASS said Slovak Prime Minister Eduard Heger had notified Slovakia of the deportation order and asked three Russian diplomats to leave Slovakia “in the next seven days”. Slovakia’s decision came after neighboring Czech country called on European allies to support Prague’s stance in expelling 18 Russian diplomats for accusing Moscow of being involved in a number of ammunition explosions. in the Czech Republic in 2014. Russian Embassy in Bratislava (Slovakia). Photo: AFP Slovakia is an ally in the European Union (EU) and the North Atlantic Treaty Bloc (NATO). The Czech Republic and Slovakia had a period of forming a unified state, known as Czechoslovakia, before a peaceful split in 1993. Prime Minister Heger explained that Slovakia’s decision to target diplomatic missions “did not respect the” principles of international law “, and stressed that the Bratislava government” desperately needed to do everything possible. to ensure security and for diplomatic missions working in Slovakia to comply with the laws (of Slovakia) and international agreements “. Accordingly, the decision to expel Russian diplomats was made by Slovakia “based on information from intelligence agencies (of Slovakia) who cooperated closely with the partner’s intelligence agencies. “and” based on the situation in the geopolitical space and current events in the Czech Republic – a country where Slovakia shows its solidarity and support “. Slovakia Jaroslav Nad noted that Bratislava’s decision was not a “cliché act” but was based on the fact that the activities of three Russian diplomats “went beyond established rules. in the international environment “. Responding to reporters’ questions about Slovakia’s move, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova said Moscow was “deeply disappointed by Bratislava’s unfriendly actions”. Ms. Zakharova accused Slovakia of “showing false solidarity” with an act Moscow called a “fabrication incident” presented by Prague. Russia has repeatedly denied its involvement in military incidents in the Czech Republic and has taken diplomatic retaliation measures. The representative of the Russian Foreign Ministry also said that Moscow will soon take measures to retaliate against the deportation order of Bratislava.

When asked what he would do in the next few days, he replied: “Who can tell? Last time they occupied the embassy without notice, so I need to be careful. ”

He only spoke briefly to reporters, but did not specify what assistance he wanted the British government to help.

Mr. Kyaw Zwar Minn was dismissed by the Myanmar military government from his post as ambassador to the UK. Photo: AP.

According to the TelegraphOn April 12, Mr. Kyaw Zwar Minn received a letter from the Myanmar military authorities, asking him to leave his residence in London, otherwise he would be prosecuted.

Mr. Kyaw Zwar Minn lives with his family at this home since being appointed Myanmar’s ambassador to the UK in 2013.

On April 7, Mr. Kyaw Zwar Minn had to sleep one night in a car because his subordinates at the Myanmar Embassy in London locked him outside the door.

Reuters Deputy Ambassador Chit Win has become the interim representative, citing four sources. Mr. Chit Win and the military attaché locked the ambassador outside the building.

Last week, British Foreign Minister Dominic Raab condemned “bullying acts by the Myanmar military regime in London”.

The British government said Myanmar’s military government announced that Kyaw Zwar Minn was dismissed, but did not specify who replaced his position.

Before that, Mr. Kyaw Zwar Minn criticized the February 1 political upheaval in Myanmar and called for the release of former elected leader Aung San Suu Kyi. Ms. Suu Kyi was arrested after the army came to power.

Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova.

“Such an act of aggression will be strongly opposed. The response to the sanctions will be inevitable … The responsibility for what is happening completely belongs to the US “- Ms. Zakharova said in a press conference.

According to Ms. Zakharova, US Ambassador to Russia John Sullivan was summoned to the Russian Foreign Ministry to have a “difficult” conversation with the US side.

“We have repeatedly warned the United States about the consequences of their hostile actions, which represents the degree of confrontation between the two countries” – said Ms. Zakharova – “Such a (political) process. do not serve the people’s interests of the two leading nuclear powers, which are historically responsible for the fate of the world.

“In a phone call with the Russian President, Mr. Joe Biden expressed interest in the normalization of Russia-US relations. However, the actions of his administration showed the opposite “- the spokesman of the Russian Foreign Ministry emphasized.

Earlier, the United States imposed anti-Russia sanctions and expelled 10 diplomats in response to accusations of Moscow’s election meddling and cyber activities.

US President Joe Biden said he is ready to take further action if Moscow continues to “interfere in our democracy” but at the same time still hopes to improve relations with Russia.

The Hanoi City Party Committee has just unanimously decided to expel Party 4 individuals involved in the Nhat Cuong case.

The Hanoi City Party Committee Inspection Committee has just announced the content of the 9th session, which examines and disciplines him. Nguyen Van TuMember, term of 2015-2020, former Chief of Office of the City Party Committee, former Director of Hanoi Department of Planning and Investment; he Nguyen Tien Hoc, former Deputy Director of Hanoi Department of Planning and Investment; grandmother Pham Thi Kim Tuyen, Head of Business Registration No. 1 and Ms. Pham Thi Thu Huong, Chief of Office of Hanoi Department of Planning and Investment.

Individuals who were disciplined by the Hanoi Party Committee Inspection Committee at the 9th session, are being prosecuted, detained for being involved in criminal cases violating the law on bidding in the past. submission of bidding package Digitalization of documents for business registration in 2016, 2017 at Hanoi Department of Planning and Investment.

After reviewing, the Inspection Committee of the City Party Committee found that the four party members mentioned above had taken advantage of their positions and powers to illegally intervene in bidding activities in the process of selecting contractors to implement the bidding package. Digitalize business registration documents in 2016 at the Department of Planning and Investment.

Pursuant to the Politburo’s Regulation No. 102-QD / TU on disciplinary punishment for violating party members, the Inspection Committee of the City Party Committee voted unanimously to request the competent Party organization to take disciplinary action in the form of excommunicating the party against Mr. Nguyen Van Tu, a member of the 2015-2020 term, former Chief of the Office of the City Party Committee, former Director of Hanoi Department of Planning and Investment.

On April 14, 2021, the Standing Committee of the Party Committee held a unanimous meeting to propose the expulsion of the Party against Mr. Nguyen Van Tu.

Proposing the Standing Committee of the Party Committee to consider and decide to discipline the Party by expelling Mr. Nguyen Tien Hoc, a party member, former Deputy Director of the Hanoi Department of Planning and Investment.

On April 14, 2021, the Standing Committee of the Party Committee held a meeting to unanimously vote on the decision to expel the Party against Mr. Nguyen Tien Hoc, a party member, former Deputy Director of the Hanoi Department of Planning and Investment.

The Hanoi Party Committee Inspection Committee decided to discipline the Party expulsion against Ms. Pham Thi Kim Tuyen, former member of the Standing Committee of the Party Committee, Chairman of the Inspection Committee of the Party Committee of the agency, Head of the Business Registration Department. Department and Ms. Pham Thi Thu Huong, former Party member, Chief of Office of Hanoi Department of Planning and Investment. At the same time, the Party Committee, the Board of Directors of the Hanoi Department of Planning and Investment were assigned to review and consider responsibilities for 7 members of the Expert Group.

At the ninth session, the Hanoi City Party Committee Inspection Committee also considered and resolved complaints of discipline of the Party Committee of the Party Committee of Giang Chinh Street, Bien Giang Ward, Ha Dong District. The Inspection Committee of the City Party Committee decided to maintain the form of reprimand. Requesting the Standing Committee of the District Party Committee, the Inspection Committee of Ha Dong District Party Committee to seriously draw from experience and promptly overcome the shortcomings and shortcomings that have been pointed out.

The Hanoi Party Committee Inspection Committee also considers and concludes the inspection of the implementation of the task of inspecting, monitoring and enforcing the Party’s discipline for the Standing Committee, the Inspection Committee of the Long Bien District Party Committee.

The police agency investigating and searched the home of the accused Nguyen Van Tu on the afternoon of December 28, 2020. (Photo: VNA).

Earlier, Dai Doan Ket reported “Chief of the Office of the Hanoi Party Committee Nguyen Van Tu is prosecuted”:

On the afternoon of December 31, 2020, at the press briefing meeting of the Hanoi Party Committee, regarding the case of the prosecution and arrest of the Chief of the Office of the Hanoi Party Committee Nguyen Van Tu, Deputy Head of the Standing Committee of the Propaganda Department Hanoi Party Committee Pham Thanh Hoc said Mr. Nguyen Van Tu was prosecuted and detained in relation to his time as the director of the Hanoi Department of Planning and Investment, not while he was the Chief of the Office. Hanoi City Party Committee.

Before that, on the afternoon of December 28, 2020, the Police Department of Investigation of the Ministry of Public Security (C03) issued a decision to prosecute the accused, a search warrant and arrest warrant for 2 defendants on charges of “Violating regulations Bidding has serious consequences ”according to Article 222 of the 2015 Penal Code, amended and supplemented in 2017, including: Mr. Nguyen Van Tu, former Director of Hanoi Department of Planning and Investment, Chanh Van Hanoi Party Committee Office; Pham Thi Thu Huong, Chief of Office of Hanoi Department of Planning and Investment.