Level 4 house with Thai roof with mezzanine in the countryside A model of a level 4 house with a mezzanine in the city Normally, level 4 houses are built on a modest ground, so the mezzanine design is considered an effective way to increase the usable area of ​​​​the house without causing its height to change. The mezzanine (or mezzanine floor, loft) is an intermediate floor, designed to connect with the ground floor and used as a space for resting, reading, worshiping… The model house level 4 has a mezzanine that is both beautiful and economical. Save the living space for the family as well as create a highlight for the house. Even if the owner uses the first floor for business, the living room can be moved to the mezzanine so that the family can both receive guests and observe the trading on the first floor. House space with mezzanine Currently, there are several types of mezzanines that are chosen by many people such as the front mezzanine, the side mezzanine and the in-room mezzanine. In particular, the front mezzanine is used a lot because it makes a strong impression when entering the living room, creating a new and attractive feeling. The mezzanine on the side brings novelty, uniqueness and personality, but must ensure the area is large enough because this type of design requires a spacious space. The mezzanine in the room is often arranged on the toilet, creating a workspace or reading place. However, to be able to find a beautiful mezzanine house design idea and suitable for the needs of the family, homeowners need to have a good construction plan. It is necessary to determine the available space, choose the most suitable material for the structure of the building and, importantly, choose the height of the mezzanine. It is necessary to avoid the design of the mezzanine that is too high or too low to affect the daily activities of family members. In addition, it is necessary to calculate in the most meticulous and detailed way the ventilation and air circulation capacity by using the appropriate light sources of the mezzanine. The height of the mezzanine must be suitable so as not to create a sense of mystery or shock for occupants. According to many architects, the height of the mezzanine should fall between 2.5m – 2.8m, the mezzanine should not be designed lower than this minimum height to avoid causing a feeling of mystery and suppression for users use; but also should not be too much higher because it makes people feel dizzy and lose their aesthetics. For a house with depth, homeowners can design a mezzanine located in the ground floor and used as a common living place. Floors with mezzanines usually have to be 4.5m – 5m high, mezzanine floors need to be designed to occupy 2/3 of the area of ​​a floor. Mezzanine design should not occupy more than 80% of the ground floor area. In particular, in Vietnam, when designing mezzanine floors, great attention must be paid so as not to violate the Construction Law; For example, if the owner fills the atrium in the mezzanine floor, it will be considered an act of building more than the allowed number of floors and will be fined. Some of the most popular indoor mezzanine models today:

The narrow street house, the space is always full of furniture because the area is not allowed, is always the obsession of homeowners who have a modest land fund to build houses in urban areas; don’t worry, learn how to design smart like a house in one of the most densely populated areas of Tokyo (Japan) to solve the problem. The house in the picture has a total area of ​​51 square meters, but thanks to its geometric design, like large and small boxes stacked on top of each other, it creates a spacious and unique feeling for the outside appearance. Thanks to the boxy design, the house has wide open lines throughout, allowing more natural light and air to flow into the house than traditional townhouse designs. The outside of the house is clad in traditional corrugated iron in the shape of horizontal lines. The windows are designed to be larger than usual, breaking the dry industrial facade shape, keeping the house open and bright. Right at the entrance is a staircase next to the semi-basement, where the bedroom and bathroom are located. The interior mainly uses light and gentle colors to create the most spacious and simple feeling for the house. On the semi-basement floor is the kitchen space and also the place to receive guests of the owner. One side includes a kitchen cabinet, the other side will install a TV shelf. In the middle is the dining table and also the reception table. This is where the light is concentrated in the house. From the living room position, there will be a small ladder leading to the top tum, which is considered the terrace of the house, as a place to cool off at night for the owner. The house uses a wooden frame as a support, creating warmth and stability for occupants.

CEO Phu Dong Group: ‘It is not capital, land fund that is the biggest difficulty for investors’.

In the position of investor’s representative, Mr. Ngo Quang Phuc, General Director of Phu Dong Group, said that at present, the problem of capital is not a problem for investors, but the biggest difficulty is the land fund for implementation of real estate projects.

According to Mr. Phuc, over the past time, the land price has increased, the planning of suitable land funds to implement projects still has many shortcomings, so to harmonize this issue, the state needs to plan specifically for each area, specially acquired land to create large land funds then auctioned investor selection implementation

Mr. Phuc also emphasized on the inadequacies of legal procedures and the state. According to the General Director of Phu Dong Group, it is necessary to shorten the time to resolve the procedures, creating opportunities for investors to implement projects faster, thereby solving the problem of lack of housing supply. now on.

Reply to TS. Nguyen Anh Tuan, Editor-in-Chief of the Investor Magazine on the problem of private participation in transport infrastructure construction, Mr. Le Do Muoi, Director of the Institute of Transport Strategy and Development ( Ministry of Transport), affirmed that the resources for transport need to be very large, it is very difficult for each state to do it.

“Medium-term capital (2021-2025) for transportation is about 1.2 million billion VND. This is a very large number. The current legal corridor has the Law on Public Investment and the PPP Law, but unfortunately the PPP law has removed the BT form from the law, making it difficult for only forms such as BOT, PPP to call for resources. Asking the giants easily get a shake of the head when calling for PPP cooperation, ”he said.

The representative of the Ministry of Transport also affirmed that transport is a public need, not a private profit. Therefore, capital needs to be socialized with great demand.

“At present, the ring roads also call on investors to participate with many suitable solutions for the benefits of both the state-investors – the people. The Ministry of Transport will sit down with interested investors to dedicate resources to listen and find different, suitable forms for cooperation. The Ministry of Transport has an open policy mechanism to call for investors in projects with high feasibility, ”said Mr. Muoi.

Regarding the issue of calling for investment capital for transport infrastructure, continue with the presentation, PhD. Nguyen Anh Tuan said that investors have great expectations on the PPP Law, but the recently issued Decree of the Ministry of Finance is facing many “complaints” and says inequality. The problem mentioned by many opinions is the mobilization of foreign capital for transport infrastructure development, but so far no investors have participated.

Answer this question, GS-TSKH. Nguyen Mai said that if mobilizing FDI, the biggest risk will be encountered is delay, which is followed by capital mobilization.

Therefore, the most important thing of current management, according to Mr. Nguyen Mai, is overcoming delays from licensing, implementation, site clearance, cost effective calculation, … to Investor implemented on schedule.

“This is a long story. And to be enforced is a story forever. FDI has so far failed in BOT, PPP and even more failed to invest in transport infrastructure. For example, it is the case that investor IL&FS (India) has expressed interest in the Hanoi – Hai Phong expressway. Although the negotiation is almost completed, the problem of many problems has made the project unable to sell “, GS-TSKH. Nguyen Mai said.

“The first BOT Decree was born in 1993, 5 years later, the PPP Law was born, but in the end, it is nothing to do, because it cannot answer the legitimate interests of investors. If we do not have innovative thinking, we do not listen to irreverent criticism, we cannot correct fundamental mistakes. Currently, many foreign investors want to participate not only in road traffic, but also railways and airports. If we have a more reasonable law, more open and transparent, and ensure legitimate benefits, both domestic and foreign investors will want to contribute capital to implement projects with the state ”, Professor-TSKH. Nguyen Mai emphasized.