<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss"
	xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#"
	>

<channel>
	<title>National Interest &#8211; Spress</title>
	<atom:link href="https://en.spress.net/tag/national-interest/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>https://en.spress.net</link>
	<description>Spress is a general newspaper in English which is updated 24 hours a day.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 02:30:08 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>
	hourly	</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>
	1	</sy:updateFrequency>
	
<site xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">191965906</site>	<item>
		<title>Russian gunboats destroy all sea targets within range</title>
		<link>https://en.spress.net/russian-gunboats-destroy-all-sea-targets-within-range/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tú Anh (TH)]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 12 May 2021 02:30:08 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[Tech]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AK 130]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[artillery]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Battleship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Bullet]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Demonstrate]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Destroy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Destroyer ship]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[efficiency]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Firecrackers]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Gunboat]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[gunboats]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Load]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Prototype]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Range]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Range of fire]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russian Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Sea]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Shoot]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Navy]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Soviet Union]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Targets]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Technical design]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Weapons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[World War 2]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://en.spress.net/russian-gunboats-destroy-all-sea-targets-within-range/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[This weapon has proven to be a high performance weapon with a rate of fire of more than 60 shots / min. AK-130 gunboat on Russian battleships. Photo: Internet Although born in the Soviet Union, but up to now, the AK-130 gunboat system is still a fearsome weapon with any target at sea in range. [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>This weapon has proven to be a high performance weapon with a rate of fire of more than 60 shots / min.</strong><br />
<span id="more-13257"></span> <img decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="https://photo-baomoi.zadn.vn/w700_r1/2021_05_11_541_38797914/bbf8e31bfd5914074d48.jpg" width="625" height="416"> </p>
<p> <em> AK-130 gunboat on Russian battleships. Photo: Internet</em> Although born in the Soviet Union, but up to now, the AK-130 gunboat system is still a fearsome weapon with any target at sea in range. Specifically, according to expert Maya Carlin on National Interest, it is the ability to complete many tasks and high stability that the Russian Navy still believes in using the AK-130 gunboat on large warships despite the weapons. This weighs up to 100 tons. Although the development time of the AK-130 has been lengthened for a variety of reasons, this weapon has proven to be a highly efficient weapon with a rate of fire of more than 60 rounds per minute. It is known that the Soviet Navy began to have plans to own large caliber automatic cannons from the years of World War II. Artillery soldiers of the Soviet Armed Forces said that the existing cannons with caliber from 100-130mm with slow firing speed limited their ability to attack aerial targets. Therefore, in the period 1952-1955, the Soviet Union developed a number of prototype automatic cannon loaded ammunition. Automatic guns were planned for development and service in the Navy as part of the shipbuilding program for the period 1956-1965, but the plan was later abandoned. Technical blueprints bearing the plant designation ZIF-92 appeared in 1969. It was a single caliber 130mm cannon. Many of the features of the ZIF-92 gun were later applied to the AK-130 gunboat. The ZIF-92 prototype featured new, but not without deficiencies. Soviet experts planned to mount ZIF-92 on the patrol boat of Project 1135 Burevestnik. However, the ZIF-92 proved too heavy for ships of this type and forced to stay on the shelf. The Soviet Navy was finally delivered with a double-barreled gunboat in 1985. The gun was named AK-130 and was installed on the Project 956 Sovremeny destroyer. The AK-130 was developed in 1976 in the Arsenal design room named MV Frunze. With the 2-barrel design was really necessary for the gunboat because 1 barrel could not guarantee a firing efficiency of 60 rounds / min. With 2 barrels, the AK-130 cannon can fire 80 rounds / minute (each barrel shoots 40 rounds). Each bullet weighs 33kg. The AK-130&#8217;s maximum range when attacking sea and ground targets is 23km.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">13257</post-id>	</item>
		<item>
		<title>US expert: Ukraine is not a reason to confront Russia</title>
		<link>https://en.spress.net/us-expert-ukraine-is-not-a-reason-to-confront-russia/</link>
		
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Tùng Dương]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Apr 2021 16:17:06 +0000</pubDate>
				<category><![CDATA[World]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[America]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ammunition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Break out]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[confront]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Confrontation]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Edition]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[expert]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Government]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Help]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Joe Biden]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Justifiable]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Kiev]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Military alliance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Most ink]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[National Interest]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Nato]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Powerful country]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[reason]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Russia]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Superpower]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Survival]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Ukraine]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[War]]></category>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">https://en.spress.net/us-expert-ukraine-is-not-a-reason-to-confront-russia/</guid>

					<description><![CDATA[The Kiev government hopes that in the event of a war with Russia they will get help from the US, but will this come easily? &#8220;Ukraine is not the right reason why the US needed to enter a confrontation with Russia&#8221;, this is the conclusion made by Wikistrat analyst Greg Lawson in his article published [&#8230;]]]></description>
										<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><strong>The Kiev government hopes that in the event of a war with Russia they will get help from the US, but will this come easily?</strong><br />
<span id="more-1387"></span> &#8220;Ukraine is not the right reason why the US needed to enter a confrontation with Russia&#8221;, this is the conclusion made by Wikistrat analyst Greg Lawson in his article published on the online edition US National Interest. .</p>
<p>American experts warn Russia is a nuclear power capable of killing millions of Americans in the event of a war. In his view, the United States can engage in an open confrontation with Russia only in the event of any &#8220;vital&#8221; threat to its existence.</p>
<p>But Mr. Lawson stressed that Ukraine is not such a case, and the situation in Donbass does not pose a direct threat to US security.</p>
<p><img fifu-featured="1" decoding="async" loading="lazy" src="https://photo-baomoi.zadn.vn/w700_r1/2021_04_15_132_38535197/e556d327f965103b4974.jpg" width="625" height="411"></p>
<p>Analyst Lawson said that the US should prioritize cooperation with Russia instead of confrontation as it is now</p>
<p>In addition, the expert also strongly opposes Ukraine&#8217;s membership in NATO, because according to Mr. Lawson, it is Kiev that is the cause of all the problems that have arisen in Europe recently. Ukraine&#8217;s accession to the military alliance will exacerbate the situation, taking its conflict with Russia to a new level, something no one wants.</p>
<p>Lawson explained that continuing to confront Russia over Ukraine could be exploited by China, which is dreaming of becoming a superpower and surpassing the US on the world rankings. So Washington needs to turn to other issues, and not to conflict with Russia.</p>
<p>Meanwhile, the US intelligence community has released another annual report on global threats. Traditionally, Russia has been at the forefront of America&#8217;s security challenges at all levels.</p>
<p>The above development shows that despite opposition from domestic analysts, the administration of President Joe Biden with a tough stance is almost certain to provide military assistance to Ukraine in the event of a war. In Donbass, if you do not participate in direct combat, you will also provide weapons, weapons, and modern military equipment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
					
		
		
		<post-id xmlns="com-wordpress:feed-additions:1">1387</post-id>	</item>
	</channel>
</rss>