Power planning 8 proposes 3 scenarios for power source development. The Institute of Energy (Ministry of Industry and Trade) has just released a report explaining the conclusions of Deputy Prime Minister Le Van Thanh on the national electricity development plan for the period 2021-2030 with a vision to 2045 (Planning for electricity development). electricity 8). In which, receiving opinions on reviewing the scale of power source development, reasonable power source structure compared to electricity demand in each period, especially in the period to 2030; In order to prevent unreasonable backup of power sources (such as the plan to develop the total installed capacity of 167GW of power sources by 2030, while the load demand is forecast at 86.3GW), the Consultant said Power planning. 8 proposed 3 scenarios for developing power sources to meet 3 scenarios of low load demand, base load and high load. The results of capacity balance of 3 selected scenarios show that renewable energy sources (wind and solar) have the proportion of 24% in 2020; 24-27% in 2030 and 38-42% in 2045 depending on the load scenario. The crude reserve ratio if including wind and solar is always high at 60-80%, but wind and solar power sources are variable renewable energy sources, contributing very little to power system redundancy, especially At the time of maximum load in the evening, there is no sun. Specifically, in the dry season, in the evening, when the national wind power occurs, it only reaches the guaranteed capacity (about 10% of the installed capacity for onshore wind and 20% of the installed capacity for offshore wind). ), at this time, the national crude reserve ratio of power supply will only reach 21% in 2020, 11%-14% in 2030 and 5%-8% in 2045 depending on the load scenario. The consultant said that in order to confirm the redundant or insufficient spare capacity, it is necessary to calculate the expected number of hours that do not meet the load demand. The calculation results show that the reserve scale as above ensures the reliability of the system’s power supply. The proportion of electricity from renewable energy sources (including hydroelectricity) in total electricity production of the selected scenarios all meet the objectives of renewable energy development in Vietnam’s Renewable Energy Development Strategy, reaching 32% in 2030 and 40.3% in 2045. According to the Institute of Energy, although the simulation of energy storage sources has been included, the minimum-cost planning model still chooses to cut a part of renewable energy to meet the flexible needs of the system instead. because investing in more storage resources, because investing in these resources will not be economically viable. The reduction rate calculated from the model is about 1.5% of renewable energy output/year (excluding cuts due to local transmission). The use of a partial reduction in renewable energy to meet flexible demand is used by countries around the world, and accepting a partial reduction in renewable energy is also one of the solutions. to develop renewable energy sources. At the request of ministries, agencies and appraisal councils, Power Master Plan 8 has included additional power source options that occur in addition to the above 3 scenarios to provide information for competent authorities to consider in determining the power supply. operating. In particular, the most difficult option to build power sources and grids is when there are risks of stacking, including high load growth and slow progress of thermal power sources (especially domestic gas exploitation sources). Accordingly, the proposal proposes to select the power source development scenario corresponding to the baseline load demand forecast, which is the selected scenario to calculate the design of the transmission grid, calculate economic and financial criteria. of Power Planning 8. At the same time, the project proposes a power source scenario corresponding to the forecast of high load demand to be considered for use in the management and development of power sources, ensuring to meet demand in the event that the national economy and electricity demand are met. load demand increased dramatically. In case of risk of stacking (high load, slow progress of coal-fired power sources, domestic gas-fired power sources), it will be necessary to add wind power, solar power, flexible power sources, etc. operate ICE to meet the demand for electricity and build more one-way lines from the South Central region to the North to transmit the capacity of power plants.

The root cause is believed to be 30 years of not trying to clear people’s doubts about vaccine side effects, according to the above article. Nikkei Asia 10/5. The landmark court ruling of 1992 During the 1980s, Japan possessed world-leading vaccine technology for the treatment of chickenpox, encephalitis, and pertussis. These technologies are licensed to the US and other countries. But vaccine development in Japan came to a near complete halt following a 1992 court ruling ordering the government to compensate people for side effects after vaccination. The Japanese people see this as a landmark ruling that opens the way for victims to seek compensation on a broader scale. A Japanese official injects a vaccine against Covid-19. Photo: Reuters. The Japanese government did not appeal the ruling. Vaccination was also no longer mandatory after the government revised the law in 1994. Since then, vaccination rates in Japan have declined as parents become more concerned about side effects. The AIDS crisis also has a negative impact. In 1996, a Japanese health ministry official was convicted of negligent manslaughter following a scandal involving HIV-contaminated blood products. Despite the government’s efforts to hold responsible, the incident still made officials in Japan feel that they would suffer the consequences if anything happened, while the politicians were unharmed. Gaps in policy Japan is currently facing a “vaccine gap”. In the US and Europe, the product licensing process takes only a few years, but in Japan it is more than 10 years. The Japanese Ministry of Health has issued a special license for the Pfizer vaccine to be administered to the elderly, but this licensing process only applies to foreign vaccines. Meanwhile, the US administration has accelerated vaccine development since the 2001 anthrax attack. When there is a public health crisis in the country, the US Department of Health and Human Services will coordinate with other agencies. research institutes and pharmaceutical companies to respond appropriately. The agency also supports development budgets, clinical trials, as well as emergency approvals. The global vaccine market is growing by nearly 7% per year. New vaccines are released every time a new deadly infectious disease emerges, such as Middle East Respiratory Syndrome (MERS) and Ebola. The mRNA technology used in making vaccines has been studied for the past 20 years and is being applied to fight Covid-19. But private companies in Japan can hardly solve this problem alone because of the lack of motivation to promote the development, purchase, or stockpile of vaccines. Japan currently does not have a domestically produced vaccine. Photo: AFP. “There is a gap in the vaccine because there is still a gap in policy,” said Tetsuo Nakayama, a professor at Kitasato University in Tokyo. One can mention the case of UMN Pharma, a Japanese biotech company that uses new technology to develop flu vaccines. UMN Pharma used to spend more than $100 million to build a manufacturing plant, but the company’s application for a license was rejected in 2017. The grounds for the rejection were that the product “lacked clinical importance” compared to vaccines. available. UMN Pharma currently has negative total assets and is owned by Shionogi – another Japanese pharmaceutical company. The vaccine made by UMN Pharma has been approved in the US. This has led one in the Japanese vaccine industry to question whether anyone still wants to make new vaccines in the country. Complicated legal regulations Technology and research talent are also flowing outside of Japan. “Japan has a lot of regulations but it has a weak support system,” said one virus expert. The country has only two research facilities that can handle the most dangerous viruses. But one of the two establishments has only recently reopened because it was previously opposed by the local people. Public Administration Reform Minister Taro Kono was appointed on January 18 as the person in charge of Japan’s vaccination campaign. Photo: Japan Times. Vaccine research in Japan is subject to complicated regulations by many ministries. Experiments involving gene editing are limited to the Cartagena Protocol. This is an international legal document on biosafety management with genetically modified organisms that Japan has approved. Meanwhile, Europe exempts pharmaceutical companies from applying the Cartagena Protocol. The United States has not yet ratified this document. Japanese manufacturers even ignore the domestic market. Takeda Pharmaceutical, for example, has no plans to license its dengue vaccine in Japan. The same thing happened with the vaccine made from tobacco leaves of Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma company. In the immediate future, Tokyo has quickly appointed a minister in charge of the Covid-19 vaccine. But products made by AnGes, Shionogi, and other Japanese companies are not expected to be approved before 2022.

According to the Bloomberg Chinese tech giants like Jack Ma’s Alibaba and Tencent Holdings operate similarly to America’s Facebook and Alphabet. They mine user data to refine digital services. Data strengths will lead to better products. As a result, large technology corporations become richer, more powerful and easily dominate the market. Over the years, the Chinese government has gone further than the rest of the world in tightening control of the Big Tech group. In March, Beijing publicly plans to “rule” platform companies that accumulate data to monopolize and swallow smaller competitors. Chinese authorities fined Alibaba $ 2.8 billion for abusing their dominant market position. Dozens of other major Internet companies also spent a month correcting their anti-competitive practices. China is tightening control of major tech corporations, including Alibaba and Ant Group of billionaire Jack Ma. Photo: Reuters. Risk of nationalization of data Beijing is pouring money into digital infrastructure, drafting new data usage laws, and building new data centers across the country. China’s goal is to be at the forefront of economic transformation in the coming decades. “It’s not a short-term initiative. China really sees data as an economic engine,” said Kendra Schaefer, Head of Digital Research at Trivium China. According to the China Institute of Information and Communication Technologies, China’s digital economy grows much faster than GDP in 2019. Market research firm IDC predicts China will hold about 1. / 3 of the world’s data in 2025, or about 48.6 zettabytes, 60% more than the US. The Chinese regime’s challenge is to get big tech companies to join. Those are the organizations that hold the most data in a country of 1.4 billion people. Companies like Alibaba and Tencent have benefited when China blocked foreign companies like Google and Facebook. Now, they have to share those benefits Professor Zhao Yanqing At a Chinese economic forum, professor Zhao Yanqing at Xiamen University pointed out that big tech companies have to nationalize data. “Companies like Alibaba and Tencent benefit when China blocks foreign platforms like Google and Facebook. Now, they have to share those benefits,” he added. However, most analysts say that is unlikely. Nationalization of data can hamper innovation. Beijing is in need of technological breakthroughs as the US works with its allies to prevent China from making new strides. “China needs highly competitive companies,” said Associate Professor Lizhi Liu at Georgetow University. “Nationalization of data will hurt technology companies. If data is taken away, they also lose their motivation and ability to innovate,” the expert added. Beijing’s difficult position In recent years, Chinese lawmakers have turned their attention to security. According to a law in 2017, authorities will have access to most personal data when necessary, even requiring foreign businesses to store data of Chinese customers in the country. Chinese leaders are now stepping up the use of big data to improve government services. Firefighters can use data to respond more quickly to calls. Hospital data will help track people down and prevent Covid-19 from spreading widely. Data lays the foundation for everything from smart cities to financial regulation to surveillance activities against dissidents. The Chinese authorities are also developing the digital yuan, competing with Ant Group’s Alipay and Tencent’s WeChat Pay. These two platforms now dominate the Chinese mobile payments market. Ant Group’s Alipay and Tencent’s WeChat Pay now dominate the Chinese mobile payments market. Photo: Reuters. The digital yuan will allow the People’s Bank of China to collect huge amounts of data about people’s transactions. Authorities have also made significant progress in the corporate social credit measurement system, from paying taxes, protecting the environment to product quality. The Chinese authorities insist that they will not force businesses to deliver data. “As for the use, development and exchange of data, we are still exploring the mechanisms,” said Hu Jianhua, deputy general manager of the Guizhou Big Data Development Administration. “Enterprises have ownership of the data. We encourage, but do not force them to, disclose the data,” he added. Data privacy is China’s “biggest obstacle” in dealing with the tech giants Expert Angela Zhang of the University of Hong Kong Another solution is that the government also invests in businesses. Last month, Bloomberg reported that China has proposed to set up a joint venture led by the People’s Bank of China (PBoC) with major technology corporations. The joint venture will monitor the data of hundreds of millions of users. Financial Times reports that billionaire Ma’s Ant Group declined the proposal. However, according to Bloomberg , a few years ago, when not agreeing to share data with the PBoC, Alibaba and Tencent faced many troubles. “Data privacy is China’s ‘biggest stumbling block’ in dealing with the tech giants. There is a conflict in protecting user privacy and fostering competition among these giants. Different backgrounds, “commented Angela Zhang, director of the China Law Center at the University of Hong Kong. China’s biggest companies are also looking to reduce damage from Beijing’s new rules. After Alibaba’s investigation is over, CEO Daniel Zhang said the company will continue to work with the data privacy regulator. Last month, Tencent’s Pony Ma proposed stricter rules for Internet businesses, including Tencent. He also has a “voluntary meeting” with the country’s antitrust agencies.

.