MV Alcohol-Free TWICE in terms of visual effects is really eye-catching. The girls dressed in colorful costumes and danced happily in the spirit of a vibrant summer. Right from the moment the picture was released teaser , netizen was surprised because stylist TWICE’s boldly cut scarves of all famous fashion houses such as Hermès, LV, Versace … to sew them into costumes for the girls. Valuable towels are not cheap, but are mercilessly cut to pieces. But in return, it must be recognized that the 9 TWICE girls had beautiful costumes, showing off their slim bodies and beautiful beauty. I thought TWICE would wear the clothes from the MV to perform in domestic music shows to promote Alcohol-Free , but recently netizen got a “flat eyes” again when witnessing TWICE’s new series of clothes in show Music Bank. Stylist continues to use the towels of the luxury fashion house Hermès to make dresses for TWICE girls. This dress of Tzuyu is made from at least 3 Hermès scarves, each costing more than 11 million VND. Mina’s dress also has to use at least 4 towels because the type of towel to sew this dress model is a triangle, and it is also not cheap, about 15 million. Chaeyoung’s set of clothes is also quite complicated and probably can’t use less than 3 towels to sew. Each sample towel costs about 10 million VND. This one-piece and slightly spread skirt of Jeongyeon is estimated to have to be sewn from 4 scarves, each costing about 12.6 million VND. Dahyun also has a very beautiful set of clothes made from two different towels, but surely the number of towels used for this set cannot be less than 4. Netizens despite praising the creativity of stylist TWICE’s family, but also constantly admiring that the choice of fabric is too luxurious. Some people even question whether stylist used goods superfake , because it’s hard to distinguish when cut out and sewn on, and this set is only worn by TWICE for one show acting, the ability to wear again is very rare. However, this is only a guess of a part of the audience.

According to Mr. Phan Vinh (Linh Nam, Hanoi), about a week ago, he was constantly tagged (marked) on posts on the social network Facebook. All of these posts have the same content related to an accident. In addition to information about the victim’s name, the article also includes a link for users to verify for themselves. “I know many people with the same name as the victim, the post is not full, so I can’t be sure who it is. Moreover, I didn’t know who the person tagged me, so I ignored those posts,” Vinh said. Users need to be wary of being tagged in Facebook posts by strangers. Photo: Trong Dat Vinh made a correct decision because if he clicked on the link, he would most likely be turned into a victim of scammers. This is not a new trick when many crooks intentionally create a fake website and trick users into accessing it. Once you click on the link attached to the article, you will be asked to log in (usually with a Facebook or Google account) to continue viewing the content. At this time, the bad guys will have their account passwords in hand to use them for impure purposes. In addition to the risk of losing the account, the victim also has the risk of revealing personal information, sensitive images, … Not only that, the bad guy can also cheat through the victim’s account Island borrow money from their friends. Usually, phishing posts have a familiar motif, with content that piqued the user’s curiosity. These posts are often accompanied by a link to another website. This is the first feature that users need to pay attention to. Bad guys often use links impersonating news agencies to trick users into accessing fake websites. Photo: Trong Dat Users also need to be wary of being tagged by strange accounts. If you see a post tagged with a large number of users (usually 99 people), absolutely do not click on the link because it is definitely a scam content. In addition, if you accidentally visit a strange link, users should not log in to their Facebook, Google, bank accounts, etc. when they receive a request, no matter what website. In fact, bad guys often use a fake website with a realistic interface to steal information, especially passwords for Facebook accounts, banks, … Therefore, users should only log in. sensitive accounts when actively accessing the websites of those services themselves. To be more careful, with websites related to financial and banking services, users should star (bookmark) these websites on the bookmarks bar of the browser. When someone asks you to borrow money on Facebook, don’t trust it, call that person directly (or through another app) to verify this information. Only with such vigilance, can users escape the “claw” of online scammers.

He added that the Abel Prize (considered the Nobel Prize for Mathematics) in 2021 was awarded to a pioneer in the field Zero Knowledge Proof – Scientist László Lovász (Mathematical Institute Alfréd Rényi and University of Eötvös Loránd in Budapest, Hungary), and Avi Wigderson (Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton, USA). The puzzle is as follows: Isla works in an office with 100 employees. One day, she discovered that her favorite paperclip was stolen by someone else. She identifies the suspicious object. Annabel, her colleague, said she was also suspicious of a person. Isla wants to know if she and Annabel are suspicious of the same person, but the two don’t want the other to know who they are doubting, in case they suspect different subjects. Isla thinks over and over how she and Annabel can check if they suspect the same person without revealing the information they find suspicious to the other party. The question is whether Isla and Annabel can find a way to reconcile their thoughts without letting the other know who they are doubting? This method should ensure that, after comparison, Isla knows whether she and Annabel are suspicious of the same person. Second, they need to make sure the other person doesn’t know they are distrusting. This verification is part of the protocol Zero-knowledge . At first glance, Alex Bellos judged that this was a puzzle without a solution. For example, Isla cannot say “The person I suspect was late for work on Monday” because it revealed some information about the other person. He also came up with a third party two-man solution, Dan, a good friend they trust a lot. Then, Isla and Annabel numbered the office staff from 1 to 100. Next, they write the number to replace the name of the suspect on a piece of paper and give it to Dan. If Dan confirms the two numbers are the same, they suspect the same person and vice versa. However, this solution is not perfect as no one can guarantee Dan from disclosing his number to the other person. Everything depends on the level of trustworthiness of the third party. Therefore, it cannot guarantee the non-disclosure of information as the quiz requires. Nearly 200 people participated in discussing Alex Bellos’s riddle and proposing measures to verify that Isla and Annabel were suspicious of the same person. Then, the author Alex Bellos together gave 3 relatively suitable methods. Can you take any measures to ensure the request of the assignment or not, ie Isla and Annabel know if they are suspicious of the same person and do not disclose information about the suspect to the other person? Readers who have difficult problems that need to be answered or want to share good calculations can send them to the newsroom at giaoduc@zing.vn.

Many security experts warned WhatsApp users not to click on the pink settings link for WhatsApp called WhatsappPink. Many security experts including Mr. Rajesh Rajaharia have voiced a warning about a virus hidden in a fake pink update link for WhatsApp called WhatsappPink. Once a user clicks on the WhatsappPink link, the virus will help hackers break in, take all access to WhatsApp in particular as well as their phones in general. The ultimate goal of a hacker is to steal victims’ personal information and bank passwords. According to Mr. Rajaharia, if a user has clicked on the fake pink update link for WhatsApp and lost access to their account or suspected something unusual happened to their account, they should immediately take action. like uninstall WhatsappPink immediately; uninstall all WhatsApp web services; clear browser cache from settings; double-check access to all applications on your phone; If you suspect losing access to any application try to get it back immediately. Warning about WhatsappPink by security expert Rajesh Rajaharia Experts also warn users to follow the basics and never install other mobile apps than those available on the official Google or Apple app store. For its part, WhatsApp has also warned users through media reports that: “Anyone can receive an unusual or suspicious message through any service, including email, private messages, and so on. text the phone and we strongly encourage everyone to be cautious before answering or participating. WhatsApp also suggests users send them a report about malicious links similar to WhatsappPink if they received it.

Burlak (named after the famous Russian river tug prior to the 20th century) is a program spanning 2005-2009 by the KBTM design bureau in Omsk, tasked with developing a modern combat turret for Modular two-man (commander and gunner), which can be used on a variety of main battle tank (MBT) chassis, including the T-72, T-80 and T-90 series, to replace the to replace the MBTs in the Soviet era in 2025. It is the result of a competition between KBTM Omsk and Uralvagonzavod (UVZ) and KBTM Omsk won by its lower cost estimate; using a lot of experience from previous development programs (most notably from the tank codenamed the Black Eagle); At that time, KBTM Omsk was in financial trouble and the program was actually a government subsidy to keep it going. The Burlak turret was developed in the 2010s to utilize the T-72, T-80 and T-90 chassis; Source: aw.my.games A unified turret was developed, including a new automatic reload mechanism for the main gun from an internal turret rack (the T-72/90 and T-64/80 series do not have the same reload mechanism This design will remedy that, eliminating the need to manufacture spare parts and maintain two different types of systems at the same time). The turret was essentially the same as the T-90A, except that it had a large frame with explosive reactive armor (ERA), which was different from the conventional Russian Kontakt-5 design. The ERA panels protrude from the bottom to the top instead of from top to bottom, creating a very special look that is hard to confuse with any other design. The armor is also highly modular and easy to replace in combat, or even upgraded to more efficient ERA designs coming in the future. ERA installed is a system called Kaktus. The turret will be divided into three separate compartments (for the gunner, commander, and gunner), increasing protection without increasing any size and with a minimal increase in mass. Additional protective measures include the option of installing an Active Protection System (APS) for Shtandart hard destruction from Object 195 and a smoke grenade launcher. The automatic loading mechanism is located outside the combat compartment; Any fires or explosions will not damage the interior of the vehicle or put the crew at risk. All mechanisms are housed in the turret to ensure the turret can be used on a variety of hulls. A Burlak prototype on a T-72B chassis was built and tested in the late 2010s; Source: aw.my.games The turret was intended to be equipped with a 125 mm 2A46M-5 smoothbore gun (the same type used on the T-90A after 2005) and designed to mount modern optical equipment (also from the T-90MS or even T- 80BVM); The remotely controlled 12.7 mm Kord anti-aircraft gun is located on the right side of the turret. The commander has a panoramic view system at his disposal. The design was overpowered from 2008-2009 and the appearance of the turret caused quite a stir at the time, especially in Ukraine, where many experts loudly accuse Russia of copying armor. -module from BM Oplot. The T-90A Burlak has a rack with two special ammunition types where both rounds have separate reload timers. In terms of portability and other parameters, the T-90A Burlak will perform almost the same as the standard T-90A. With a weight of 49.5 tons (this is an extremely important requirement due to the limitations of Russian transport aircraft), it will be powered by a 1,130 horsepower engine and a top speed of 65 km / h. At least one prototype was built and tested on a T-72B chassis in 2008 or 2009, although there are significant differences from previous drawings and patents. At the time, the Omsk Design Office, facing long term financial difficulties, was finally incorporated into UVZ. UVZ has two competing projects more or less at the same time – the Burlak program and its own variants of the T-90M Proryv-2, namely the T-90MS. Under these circumstances, the Burlak project was not considered feasible; At the end of 2009, the program was stopped. T-14 Armata alternative candidate? In June 2015, the Russian Government announced that the Armata is designed to replace the older T-72B3 and T-80 tanks in Russian Ground Forces equipment. Moscow plans to build 2,300 Armata vehicles by 2020, enough for about eight divisions of tanks and motorized infantry. Equipped with new engines, dual-reactive armor, lower radar cross-sections and the Afghan active defense system, NATO sees Armata as a formidable new threat. When the Armata program faced some difficulties, Burlak was a good candidate to replace the T-14 Armata because it was more affordable and easier to manufacture, while the combat performance was almost comparable; Source: reddit.com But despite many efforts, the Armata project ran into financial and technological difficulties that slowed development. Today, the Russian Army does not have Armata tanks, deliveries are promised later this year. A Russian military blog that recently discovered the Burlak tank design, which appeared to have lost to Armata in the late 2000s, would be an interesting compromise to make use of the old tank stock and existing tank technology gives Russia an almost as good a vehicle as Armata. The T-80 was considered a failure, as its gas turbine electric motor was unreliable, but Russia built around 3,000 T-80s, and hundreds (if not thousands). Among them are still being stockpiled across the country. A new and refurbished dynamic complex could become a spacious home for the Burlak turret. Can Burlak replace Armata in Russian tank divisions? One feature that makes the Burlak more affordable and easier to manufacture than the Armata is its use of the T-80 tank frame. The Burlak is also armed with powerful weapons, and its lower cost and reduced risk certainly make it attractive. And while the Burlak will not have the same body protection as the Armata, the explosive reactive armor plates and the Afghan active protection system can help make a difference. It is worth noting that the appearance of the tank turret underwent a number of changes, which shows that the Burlak program has received a new step in development. Such an upgraded tank would lack some of the T-14’s advanced features, but it would certainly be more affordable, while Russia could quickly produce hundreds. Having still good modernized tanks seems more appealing than waiting for a few more advanced T-14s to show up.