This is reminiscent of the Kuaishou anchor who overturned another car with goods some time ago. According to the feedback from fans, the mobile phone they bought in the live broadcast room of a certain Kuaishou broadcaster may be a fake. The declared storage and memory are too far from the actual application, and the hardware configuration is also severely shrunk, and even the network access permission is arrogant. Soon, the Kuaishou platform came out to investigate the results, and users who bought this phone will receive 9 times the compensation, which allowed the incident to calm down.
I thought that this matter would come to an end at this point, but I didn’t expect that there were new developments recently. It turned out that there was not only one mobile phone that had a problem in the live broadcast room of the anchor. Now users of other mobile phones have also begun to demand compensation from the platform. If the principle of non-discrimination is followed, Kuaishou will also make a false one-for-nine decision for this. It means that the potential loss of Kuaishou will be as high as billions.
But what is surprising is that users who have purchased other mobile phones have encountered trouble when seeking compensation. According to media reports,

In the process of users seeking 9 times compensation, Kuaishou customer service said that they had not been notified by the platform that other mobile phones had to pay 9 times. As for the content of the follow-up compensation, the customer service only said to give feedback to the user, but the user was asked to fill in the content of the compensation for 3 times. Seeing the response given by Kuaishou, the first reaction of most people must be that Kuaishou began to regret it. Obviously it is the same live broadcast room and sold in the same period of time. Why does one of the mobile phones that have been determined to be fake can get 9 times the compensation, while the other phones have been unable to determine whether it is a fake or not? If it’s not a fake product, why should Kuaishou give the user a fake one and lose three? Especially when talking about feedback, but there is no feedback result, such an approach is really too perfunctory, this is not an attitude to solve the problem. To be honest, the 9 times compensation was the original promise of Kuaishou, but now the 9 times compensation has quietly shrunk to 3 times. We have to ask why? Some netizens speculated that the original 9 times compensation was to calm the development of the situation. If the compensation were all 9 times, the loss of Kuaishou would be too great. Another voice pointed out that Kuaishou has no way to compensate now. The previous Simba incident is still vivid. If you pay 9 times the compensation at this moment, it will cause irreparable loss to the business reputation of Kuaishou. But having said that, the 9 times compensation that Kuaishou himself said has quietly become 3 times. There is another question that makes people very curious, and that is, in the face of subsequent compensation, can Kuaishou still be able to handle it? You know, if you calculate according to the original sales, nearly half of the shipments will cause Kuaishou to lose more than 4 billion. And the head anchors made mistakes one after another, and even the credibility that Kuaishou e-commerce had just accumulated collapsed. Now Kuaishou is in a dilemma. Perhaps seeing the current situation, Kuaishou will regret the original decision, which is really a big talk. When expressing the attitude of correcting mistakes, I only wanted to reduce the heat of the incident, and hurriedly said too much, so that now I can only use “delaying tactics.” But on the other hand, as a manager, if even the anchor of his own platform is not well managed, and he even wants to go back in the face of the original promise, this is not a devastating blow to the business reputation of Kuaishou. So, in your opinion, can these consumers get 9 times compensation in the end?

The US-EU reached a historic agreement to settle a 17-year dispute involving Airbus and Boeing. (Source: Getty Images) US officials confirmed that the country and the EU had reached an agreement to end a dispute over government subsidies to the world’s top commercial aircraft manufacturers at the US Summit- EU in Brussels. The two sides agreed to suspend the tariffs for a period of five years. US Trade Representative Katherine Tai said the deal “resolves a longstanding trade issue in the US-EU relationship”. “Instead of fighting one of our closest allies, we are ultimately fighting a common threat together,” Ms. Tai said. Under the agreement between Airbus-Boeing, any passenger aircraft built in the future will not be allowed to receive subsidies from the government. In addition, these two allies also pledged to settle another dispute related to imported aluminum and steel products. According to the CNN The fact that the EU and the US reached an agreement to end the dispute and impose a “eaten patty” tax for the past 17 years is a positive signal for bilateral cooperation under President Joe Biden. Immediately after the news was announced, shares of Airbus group rose 1.4% on the Paris exchange. Meanwhile, shares of Boeing have not changed much. (according to CNN)

A new survey conducted and published by the Central Institute for Economic Management showed that 24.4% of enterprises recorded having had a dispute with a buyer, seller or both in the past time. Goods received that are not the same as advertised is one of the typical violation trends in e-commerce in Vietnam. Illustration: KT In particular, the trend of disputes in the online trading environment is increasing. Currently, there are 4 popular dispute resolution methods in Vietnam including negotiation, conciliation, arbitration and court. 57.8% of businesses and individuals choose the negotiation method; 46.8% chose to resolve disputes through the courts, while 22.8% conducted mediation and the rest needed arbitration to handle disputes. Notably, although Vietnam has a Law on Electronic Transactions, the trend of applying technology in resolving online disputes has not been applied much due to the incomplete legal framework and not many people know about it. ./.

For human life today, toilets are extremely popular to serve the daily needs of each individual. However, under the Middle Ages, the aristocrats in Europe had a unique way of dealing with “sadness” in the context of not having toilets in the house. Specifically, hundreds of years ago, the aristocracy in some European countries used a ceramic vase named Bourdaloue when needed to go to the toilet. The Bourdaloue ceramic vase is designed with an oval shape. In addition to ceramic, it is also made of porcelain. Bourdaloue vases are sold in ceramic shops. Customers of the aristocracy often bought a few for home use. Accordingly, the Bourdaloue urns are placed in several rooms, including bedrooms for aristocrats to use at times of day. Unlike men, female aristocrats in Europe often wore spread-out dresses. Therefore, the noblewoman can use a skirt to hide the Bourdaloue vase inside while going to the toilet without losing her aesthetics. After use, the servant will take the Bourdaloue bottle to waste and clean it before placing it back in place. Thanks to the Bourdaloue vase, the aristocracy in ancient Europe was able to handle “sadness” in its own way. Later, the Bourdaloue vase no longer prevailed and gradually disappeared from society when the sanitary ware was invented. Invite readers to watch the video: Russia and Ukraine sign a new agreement on gas transportation to Europe. Source: THĐT 1.