Court separates claim from administrative case vụ In 2015, Mr. Tien (Mrs. Ngoc’s husband) won the auction of two stalls in Cao Lanh City’s cage and signed a contract with the management board of the market to sell sports equipment. After that, he asked to switch to selling cosmetics and was approved by the Finance – Planning Department, so he bought more than 500 million dong of goods for sale. More than a month later, he had his license to sell cosmetics revoked. The market management board of Cao Lanh city, Dong Thap province seized the goods of Mrs. Dang Thi Bich Ngoc and her husband. Photo: YC In July 2016, Chairman of the City People’s Committee Cao Lanh fined Ms. Ngoc 2.5 million dong for doing business as a household business without a business household registration license in accordance with the law. Ms. Ngoc complained but was denied. Because she still sells cosmetics, the chairman of the City People’s Committee again fined her 3 million dong. Ms. Ngoc sued all three of the above decisions. Then she closed the counter, waiting for the trial, the market management board unlocked the stall by itself, seizing all the cosmetics. In 2018 and 2019, the People’s Court of Dong Thap province and the High People’s Court in Ho Chi Minh City both accepted the petition of Ms. Ngoc and her husband, declaring to cancel all three decisions. The claim was separated by the court into another case. Accepted for nearly two years, brought to trial three times and then suspended According to the instructions of the two judgments above, Ms. Ngoc and her husband went to sue the Chairman of the People’s Committee and the People’s Committee of Cao Lanh City for compensation. Specifically, regarding the compensation claim, the first instance court said that it was not related to administrative decisions but to civil business and commercial relations, so it should be separated into another case. As for the appellate court, it clearly states that “the fact that the market management board officers counted, counted and sealed the goods Ms. Ngoc was selling, if causing damage to Ms. Ngoc, she has the right to sue these people to demand compensation for the damage. by another case”. Since then, she has sued the president and Cao Lanh City People’s Committee for compensation as instructed by the two courts. However, the Cao Lanh City People’s Court, after accepting this case for nearly two years and bringing it to trial three times, suspended it on the grounds that the lawsuit claim had been settled by a legally effective judgment. Previously, at the trial on March 25, 2021, the trial panel paused the trial and transferred the file to the police agency to see if there were signs of criminal offense when losing her box… As soon as she received the decision, Ms. Ngoc appealed the request to cancel the suspension decision and asked the court to continue the settlement. According to Ms. Ngoc, the court’s suspension is to deprive her of her right to sue, which is an illegal act. At the same time, Ms. Ngoc also filed a complaint against the judge who was handling the case because she thought that the judge was not objective, lacked transparency, and issued an illegal suspension decision. Court accepted the reason there was “misunderstanding” Talking to PV, the judge dealing with the case said that Ms. Ngoc must sue the market management board about a contract dispute or a civil dispute for compensation for damage from the contract. The judge analyzed: Ms. Ngoc asked the Chairman of the People’s Committee and the People’s Committee of Cao Lanh City to pay compensation due to the administrative decision, the appellate judgment of the High People’s Court was resolved (rejecting the request because the above decisions were not the original reason). directly causing damage to Ms. Ngoc). Reporter asked: “If so, why is the court still accepting, after nearly two years and three times of trial, it has been suspended?”. The judge admitted the court also had a “misunderstanding”. After a period of research, she realized that the court stopped her and allowed her to sue again with another case. Court suspension: Wrong or right? Commenting on this issue, Dr. Nguyen Van Tien, Deputy Dean of the Civil Faculty of Ho Chi Minh City University of Law, said that: According to the notice not to prosecute the case of Cao Lanh City Police and the decision to settle the complaint of the Procuracy. It was found that due to the direction of the Chairman of the People’s Committee and the People’s Committee of Cao Lanh City, the market management board came to seize the goods. Therefore, the fact that Ms. Ngoc sued the Chairman of the People’s Committee and the People’s Committee of Cao Lanh City is grounded. However, even if the market management board follows the instructions, they are still the ones who directly seize the goods leading to damage, so the market management board must be responsible. The Finance – Planning Department (with written consent for Ms. Ngoc to convert the counter into a cosmetic business) together with the Market Management Board to seize the goods, should also be jointly responsible. According to Dr. Tien, the general rule is that whoever causes damage must compensate. Therefore, Ms. Ngoc can sue the Chairman of the People’s Committee, the People’s Committee of Cao Lanh City, the Market Management Board and the Finance – Planning Department to jointly compensate for damage caused by the illegal seizure of goods. Dr. Tien said that the court’s suspension on the grounds that Ms. Ngoc’s request was resolved was not convincing. In this case, the court needs to clarify the cause-and-effect relationship between the decision-making and direction of the City People’s Committee and the seizure of goods by the market management board. It can be seen that the cause of the incident was partly from the direction of the City People’s Committee, but the market management board did not voluntarily implement it. Therefore, Ms. Ngoc’s lawsuit to request the defendants to jointly compensate must be considered an unresolved claim as determined by the first-instance and appellate judgments in the previous administrative case. Sued additional market management board, why still suspend? Before filing the lawsuit, I reported the seizure of goods to the police to investigate the crime of openly appropriating property. However, the police and the People’s Procuracy of Cao Lanh city said that the market management board performed the tasks assigned by the People’s Committee of Cao Lanh City, with no signs of crime. Therefore, my wife and I sued the Chairman of the People’s Committee and the People’s Committee of Cao Lanh City. My third additional claim is that the Chairman of the People’s Committee, Cao Lanh City People’s Committee, Market Management Board, Finance – Planning Department (under Cao Lanh City People’s Committee, participating as a related person) must jointly compensate usually the amount of goods illegally seized (nearly 500 million dong), not a claim for compensation caused by an administrative decision. Mrs DANG THI BICH NGOC

The lawsuit, filed by Attorney General Karl Racine’s office, accuses Amazon of controlling nearly 70% of e-commerce sales, leading to high consumer prices. Holding nearly 70% of commercial sales, Amazon is sued against antitrust in the US The complaint was received by the District of Columbia Attorney’s Office, which said: “This online retail platform benefits and is protected by Amazon’s anti-competitive business practices. That leaves consumers vulnerable. do not have access to the best products at the lowest cost”. In addition, Amazon also caused prices across the entire online retail market to increase virtual prices for products sold on Amazon.com as well as on competitors’ online retail sales platforms. Also in the lawsuit, the e-commerce group used methods to prevent third-party sellers on its platform from offering products at lower prices than competitors. Amazon also responded to AFP that sellers set their own prices for the products they offer in Amazon’s stores, and this response contradicts comments made by the Justice Department. This e-commerce group also prides itself on offering the lowest prices with the best selection unlike any other online platform, so Amazon reserves the right not to attach deals to products that don’t have it. competitive price for customers. This lawsuit has Amazon possibly forced to charge higher prices on its e-commerce platform. The lawsuit is intended to block Amazon from anticompetitive practices as well as claims for damages and other penalties. According to eMarketer, Amazon’s e-commerce market share in the US in 2020 is 39.8% and will increase in 2021 to 44.1%, equivalent to the amount of 367.19 billion USD. According to statistics, Amazon’s profit in the first 3 months of 2021 reached 8.1 billion USD, 3 times higher than the same period in 2020. In 2020, the US Federal and State Antitrust Enforcement Agency filed lawsuits against Facebook and Google for allegedly dominating illegal markets.

Accordingly, the group is asking Apple to return money to UK customers, with about 19.6 million people will be compensated a total of 1.5 billion pounds (equivalent to 2.1 billion USD). They believe that the US technology company has a monopoly when the App Store is the only “door” to download many applications to iPhone and iPad. The application emphasizes that after 13 years, the App Store is still the only source for Apple devices to access applications, proving that the company has been selfish, charging login fees and using this mechanism unfairly. They claim this is proprietary behavior. According to the lawsuit, Apple receives about 30% of the cost of purchasing an app. Apple, for its part, calls this a planned lawsuit and shouldn’t have happened. The company insists it is committed to its customers and that the App Store has greatly benefited the UK creative economy.
In addition, Apple is currently facing many legal challenges related to exclusivity when using the App Store because of a lawsuit for the same reason by Epic Games – the maker of the famous Fortnite game. according to iMore

Expert Kent, a lecturer at King’s College, University of London, believes that Apple has a monopoly when the App Store is the only door to download many applications to iPhone and iPad. App Store is always accused of charging too much According to this lecturer after 13 years, the App Store is still the only source for Apple devices to access applications, reflecting the company’s selfish “guarding” of the entrance to the world of applications, charging subscription fees. import and use “unfairly” and this is proprietary behavior. According to the lawsuit, Apple receives about 30% of the cost of purchasing an app. Apple has denied these allegations and said it would be open to discussing “the commitment to consumers and the many benefits the App Store has brought to the UK’s innovation economy”. The company also compared the App Store to other digital marketplaces and reiterated that the majority of developers don’t pay Apple for anything because 84% of the apps on the App Store are free. Last month, the European Union (EU) officially accused Apple of relying on the App Store, which has gradually eliminated competitors in the field of streaming (streaming). In March, UK competition authorities also launched an investigation into Apple related to the App Store.

Zhang Yazhou made a riot at the Tesla booth in April and shouted that “Tesla broke the brake”. Photo: Global Times. According to the The Beijing News Yazhou requested a compensation of 50,000 yuan, about 7,700 USD, to compensate for the mental damage caused by the incident to herself and her family. The lawsuit was filed in a court in China’s Henan province on May 6. The story originates from an accident that happened in February this year, when Yazhou’s father was driving a Tesla Model 3, while Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat. An unexpected incident occurred, the car crashed into the vehicle ahead, injuring Yazhou’s father and hospitalized. Yazhou asserted that the faulty brake system led to the accident, and carried out a series of different demonstrations, even looking to the riotous Shanghai Auto Show at the Tesla booth. Tesla is facing many complaints about customer service in China. Photo: Reuters. Tesla then released the car’s black box data, saying that in about 30 minutes before the crash, the car accelerated at times to nearly 120 km / h, braking 40 times and significantly reduced speed. degrees at the moment before the crash. Tesla doubted the incident might stem from Yazhou’s father speeding the car and not keeping a safe distance from the car in front. Yazhou of course disagrees with this conclusion of Tesla and thinks that the company may have interfered with the data to put false information. Although Tesla had offered to ask another independent unit to check the data from the vehicle, Yazhou refused. Tao Lin – Tesla’s vice president of global operations, said in a statement on April 19 that every action of Zhang Yazhou was “professional”, as if someone was behind to support her. This entire scheme is intended to undermine Tesla’s reputation. This is also the reason for Yazhou client’s decision to sue Ms. Tao Lin. In addition, Tesla Shanghai and Tesla Beijing are also on the list to be sued. In addition to the cost of compensation, Yazhou also asked all three of the aforementioned individuals and organizations to immediately stop the accusations, write letters of apology and post their apologies publicly on the national media. The cost of the lawsuit must also be paid by Tesla’s side. In the lawsuit, Zhang Yazhou also said that Tesla “should have actively negotiated and handled” product quality issues “with a demand and customer-focused attitude.” Instead, she accused the automaker of “making false statements to create a negative image” of her.

The boy born in 2003 is still trying hard to find a style that suits him. In the process, he showed his creativity when wearing designs with unique motifs and patterns. Most of Trung Dinh’s outfits are second-hand. “I choose si clothes because the price is super cheap” When asked the reason for choosing boxed goods, Trung Dinh said: “The first is super cheap. Also, I can find unique items when hunting for delicacy. The last reason is that you will never. know what to find when hunting second-hand “. Trung Dinh’s clothes usually cost about 50,000-250,000 VND. Photo: NVCC. The 18-year-old has been passionate about second-hand gear since 2019. At that time, he was in 10th grade. During the two years of hunting, Trung Dinh has accumulated more experience. Besides, he asserted that hunting for cargo had many difficulties. When choosing to buy second-hand clothing, Trung Dinh needs to carefully check the quality, in case the clothes are torn or defective. There are days when a man from Phan Thiet has to move to many places selling things to find his favorite design. Sometimes, he took time to sit and choose, check, but could not find any suitable item. In the event that Trung Dinh is late, good quality clothes will be bought by others. Normally, a sample of Trung Dinh shirt will cost about 50,000-100,000 VND. He spent 150,000-250,000 VND on pants and about 100,000 VND for jackets. To get quality clothes at an affordable price, Trung Dinh asked for the number of the shop owner. They will notify you when new packages are released or more stock will be available to arrange for early purchase. In addition, the boy born in 2003 advised readers of Zing can hunt for si on social networks. This is how you do not have to struggle, dive into the street. Outfits sold online are also unique. At the same time, he emphasized: “Attention when coordinating is that the proportions of the body and the outfit color need to be harmonious and uniform”. The boy was born in 2003 and has a journey to find his own style Wearing costumes inspired by high-end brands, sharing unique mixing recipes that help Nguyen Trung Dinh be loved. Besides, he affirmed that fashion should have an element of confidence, comfortable wearing stylish clothes without paying attention to the eyes of society. The boy born in 2003 is in the process of experimenting with many styles. Photo: NVCC. The guy from Phan Thiet loves cartons. The clothes he has worn in the last two years are all second-hand outfits. He identified himself as a multi-styled person. “Currently, I constantly learn and experiment to find the style that suits me best,” Trung Dinh said. The 18-year-old boy used to mix with a hip hop, minimalist … However, the outfits chosen by Trung Dinh always contain a similarity of nostalgia and personality. Besides, many of his designs make an impression through unique details. For Trung Dinh, costume color is a very important factor. The outfits using floating and eye-catching colors should be coordinated with the right tones, helping to neutralize the overall. In addition, the guy from Phan Thiet suggested choosing tones to highlight eye-catching colors when coordinating colorful outfits. In the case of new dress matching lessons, no knowledge of color matching, Trung Dinh suggests simple and neutral designs. The girl has the talent to make shirts from discarded shoes Nicole McLaughlin is famous for her ability to use recycled materials to make clothes.

Gökçe is the owner of the Nusr-Et Steakhouse restaurant chain with branches in many countries around the world. Gökçe became famous after a clip of his expressive salt spraying went viral on Twitter and Instagram.

Salt Bae “Holy Salt” performs his signature salt sprinkle show at the Nusr-Et steakhouse in Manhattan. (Photo: Cole Wilson / The New York Times)

According to the New York Post, the extremely famous male chef on this social network is currently caught in a $ 5 million lawsuit due to copyright infringement by American artist William Hicks.

Specifically, William Hicks accused Salt Bae of using his work for commercial purposes without his permission.

Previously, in September 2017, Salt Bae “holy salt” hired William Hicks and colleague Josphe Iurato to make a mural of him in the famous “salt sprinkling” pose.

A painting by painter William Hicks and his colleague Josphe Iurato of Salt Bae in the famous “salt spray” pose. (Photo: NYPost)

Until early 2020, Hicks discovered that Gökçe and the male chef’s company used the image on a variety of products such as digital signage, restaurant menus, napkins, paper bags and spices. without permission from 2 original artists.

In February 2021, Gökçe launched a special line of spices for baking, and continued to use images created by the duo artists Hicks and Iurato.

Salt Bae was accused of using the work of painter William Hicks for commercial purposes without his permission. (Photo: New York Times)

“The defendants unilaterally adapt and distribute the derivative versions of the original works for display at the Nusr-et steak restaurants in many cities and countries such as Abu Dhabi, Ankara, Etiler, Mykonos and Bodrum Yalikavak Marina, “the allegation said.

Previously, Hicks sent a letter asking chef Nusr-et Gökçe to stop using the original painting in off-agreement products in April 2020.

Salt Bae “Holy Salt” became famous after the clip recording his expressive salt spraying scene went viral on Twitter, Instagram. (Photo: JERRITT CLARK / GETTY IMAGES)

However, Salt Bae and the company still “doubled the scope of violations, intentionally using images in other locations”.