Estimated cost to build a level 4 house with an area of ​​​​45m2 How to calculate the cost of building a house = Raw area x Wages in m2. To help homeowners better visualize this calculation, the article takes an example of the cost of building a level 4 house with an area of ​​​​45m2. Rough area = Foundation + 1st Floor + Roof The foundation: occupies 50% of the area = 45m2 x 50% = 22.5m2 1st floor: occupies 100% of the area = 45m2 The roof has 3 different roof types, accounting for different percentages: Flat roof: 70% of the area = 70% x 45m2 = 31.5m2 Thai roof: Occupying 50% of the area = 50% x 45m2 = 22.5m2 Corrugated iron roof, tile roof: 30% of the area = 30% x 45m2 = 13.5m2 The total area of ​​a level 4 house with an area of ​​​​45m2, choosing a corrugated iron roof, is: 22.5m2 + 45m2 + 13.5m2 = 81m2 Construction unit prices on the market today are calculated in two ways: The first way: Construction contractor, finishing labor, the cost ranges from 3 million VND to 3.5 million VND/m2 using mid-priced materials. Applying the formula to calculate the cost of building a level 4 house with an area of ​​​​45m2, choosing the corrugated iron roof just calculated above, we have: 81m2 x 3,000,000 = 243,000,000 VND. The second way: The contractor takes care from a to z – Turnkey, the cost ranges from 4.5 million VND to 6 million VND/m2, choosing materials from average to good. Applying the formula to calculate the cost of building a level 4 house with an area of ​​​​45m2, choosing the corrugated iron roof just calculated above, we have: 81m2 x 4,500,000 = 364,500,000 VND. This unit price will fluctuate depending on different locations, depending on the price of raw materials as well as the cost of labor. However, applying the correct formula is possible to calculate the cost of building a flat roof or a corrugated iron roof for your house. The unit price of rough construction does not include the cost of interior equipment such as: house tiles, toilet tiles, tiles, etc. Other costs when building a level 4 house With the cost of paint, there are two types of putty with two different qualities. High-grade paint is priced at 60,000 VND/m2 and medium quality paint is priced at 35,000 VND/m2. Applied to calculate the cost of paint for two level 4 houses, we have the formula: Floor area x unit price of paint per m2 x 4 Where: 4 is the unit factor of 4 walls to be painted. Depending on the region, the locality will have different unit prices, but just by applying the correct formula, you can calculate the cost of painting your level 4 house with different areas. For example: The cost of painting for a level 4 house with an area of ​​45m2, choosing a high-class paint line that costs VND 60,000/m2 is 45m2 x 60,000 VND/m2 x 4 = VND 10,800,000 The cost of painting a level 4 house with an area of ​​45m2, choosing a high-end paint line that costs VND35,000/m2 is 45m2 x 35,000 VND/m2 x 4 = 6,300,000 VND Next to the cost of house tiles, similar to paint, there are also two different types of tiles for homeowners to choose from. High-end floor tiles are priced at 300,000 VND/m2 and average floor tiles are priced at 150,000 VND/m2. The formula for calculating the cost of tiles is: Floor area x unit price in m2. The cost of floor tiles for a level 4 house with an area of ​​​​45m2, choosing high-class tiles for 300,000 VND/m2 is 45m2 x 300,000 VND/m2 = 13,500,000 VND The cost of floor tiles for a level 4 house with an area of ​​45m2, choosing an average tile is quite expensive at 150,000 VND/m2 is 45m2 x 150,000 VND/m2 = 6,750,000 VND For houses that use tiles for the roof, the cost for 1 tile is 30,000 VND/piece, 10 bricks per square meter, labor cost is 5,000,000 VND/m2. The total cost of finishing tiles for a 45m2 house is 20 million VND. All prices are for reference only! Some compact, low-cost models of level 4 houses can be referred to:

After 3 days of questioning, on April 14, the representative of VKSND Hanoi announced the impeachment of 19 defendants related to wrongdoing at the second phase of production expansion project of Thai Nguyen Iron and Steel Company (TISCO).

Break contract rules

Accordingly, the VKSND proposed the Panel to sanction the defendant Tran Trong Mung, former General Director of TISCO, from 10-11 years in prison; Mai Van Tinh, former Chairman of the Board of Vietnam Steel Corporation (VNS), from 6-7 years in prison; Tran Van Kham, former Chairman of the Board of Directors, General Director of TISCO from 9-10 years in prison; Dau Van Hung, former General Director of VNS from 3-4 years in prison and 11 other defendants were recommended from 2-7 years in prison with the same crime “Violation of regulations on management and use of state property causes losses. , waste”. In addition, 4 other defendants were recommended 1-3 years in prison for the same crime of “Lack of responsibility, causing serious consequences”.

Defendant Mai Van Tinh at the trial

According to VKSND, TISCO is the investor of the second-phase production expansion project of TISCO. The VNS Board of Directors is the level of investment decision, with the function of directing project implementation. The winning bidder is China Metallurgical Science, Technology and Trade Corporation (MCC).

During the implementation of EPC Contract No. 01, more than 11 months from the effective date of the contract, MCC has not selected and signed the contract with the subcontractor; the detailed design of the items has not been completed, the machinery and equipment are not ordered to manufacture, the contract items have not been executed, but all people have been sent home; repeatedly proposed to extend the contract performance period; Unwarranted contract price increases …

With the assigned functions, duties and powers, defendant Mung is the General Director of TISCO and defendant Tinh, the Chairman of the Board of Directors of VNS, did not consider, direct the suspension, termination of the contract, withdrawal of advance payment, and use the contract penalty clause, report to the competent person for consideration to cancel the bid and re-organize the bidding according to regulations. On the contrary, the defendants directed the violations of the investment laws and the EPC Contract No. 01 to continue the contract performance, together with their subordinates in directing relevant individuals to the organization making adjustment of cost estimate part C. Along with that, participating in subcontracting to perform Part C of EPC Contract No. 01 in the form of unit price contract, TISCO directly takes over, takes over and makes payment. for the subcontractor to implement Part C, bear all risks, break the principle of implementing the contract in the form of a package, creating conditions for MCC to have a reason to deny the responsibility of implementing EPC Contract No. 01.

Competent contractor approval

In addition, the defendants also agreed that the Vietnam Industrial Construction Corporation (VINAINCON) was not qualified as a subcontractor to implement Part C of the EPC Contract No. 01, resulting in the project being delayed. raising interest rates, increasing investment costs, causing a particularly serious loss of state assets of more than VND 830 billion. The defendant’s behavior also adversely affects the interests of workers, indirectly adversely affects the economic development process and is currently a burden on the economy, affecting social security.

In this case, defendant Mung has the main role, is the person who directs and organizes the implementation of the offense. Specifically, when MCC breached the contract, the defendant directed to negotiate with MCC to separate Part C from EPC Contract No. 01, TISCO organized the implementation and took the risk; sign documents to report VNS and the Ministry of Industry and Trade request to report to the Government for approval of price adjustment for part C of the contract; Introduce and approve VINAINCON is not qualified as a subcontractor to perform Part C according to unit price …

Defendant Tinh is a co-offender of active crime. When TISCO reported the breach of the contract by TISCO, the defendant directed to negotiate with MCC to resolve the arising of EPC Contract No. 01; directly sign documents to request the Ministry of Industry and Trade to report to the Government for cost adjustment part C of EPC Contract No. 01; signed a document requesting the Government to agree on the policy of approving that VINAINCON is not qualified as a subcontractor to perform Part C; sign the written approval and assign the capital representative of VNS at TISCO to approve the adjustment of the total project investment structure, including the provision for part C of EPC Contract No. 01 increased by 15.57 million USD has no legal basis, is not in accordance with the provisions of EPC Contract No. 01.