Husband of Shanghai Rights Defending Female Car Owner Doesn’t Approve Driving Data, Says Tesla Infringes Personal Privacy

What happened 1 minute before the incident?Tesla releases data

On April 22, the continued fermentation of Tesla’s brake failure incident made the latest progress as Tesla provided the data before the accident for the first time. The husband of a female human rights activist in Shanghai reiterated late at night: Tesla has violated personal privacy rights, requesting data withdrawal and an apology The husband of the female car owner, Mr. Li, responded to the Elephant News reporter late at night that he violated the owner’s personal privacy and consumer rights and will immediately file a complaint with the Zhengzhou City Market Supervision Department. Tesla’s person responsible for handling the accident stated that the data had been sent to the customer by email. Since the customer’s phone number has not been answered, Tesla sent it to the customer’s mailbox when they bought the car through the company’s mailbox. “My wife is still in the detention center and the mobile phone is in the hands of the police. How can I receive a call?” Mr. Li said that before Tesla released the data one minute before the vehicle accident to the public, he had never obtained it with Zhang’s family. Over contact. Mr. Li only talked to the relevant person in charge of the Zhengdong New District Market Supervision and Administration Bureau of Zhengzhou City on the afternoon of the 22nd. The person in charge only told Mr. Li that Tesla had been ordered to provide data to the car owner and did not mention driving data. Released through the media. Tesla released the driving data without any communication with the car owner. After seeing the news, Mr. Li was very surprised, “This has violated our personal privacy and consumer rights.” Mr. Li was first right. The driving data presented by Tesla expressed disapproval. At the same time, he believed that the driving data belonged to personal property and personal privacy, and Tesla disclosed it to the media and the public without the owner’s permission, which he could not accept. In the next step, Mr. Li will file a complaint with the Zhengzhou Municipal Market Supervision Administration, and at the same time ask Tesla to apologize publicly and revoke the driving data. Tesla once again speaks out late at night: will unreservedly cooperate with the investigation Tesla re-issued a document on the 22nd night, saying that it fully accepts the decisions of the State Administration of Market Supervision and the Zhengzhou City Market Supervision Administration, and does its best to actively cooperate with all related investigations, effectively fulfill the main responsibility of quality and safety, and provide consumers with High-quality and safe products and services. Tesla said that as of April 21, it has provided complete driving data half an hour before the accident, and has proactively contacted and communicated with relevant parties and reported relevant situations on many occasions.

Further reading

Another Tesla Rights Defender Owner Says: Detection Cannot Keep Up with Technological Development

Soon after Tesla announced the situation one minute before the data restoration accident, another car owner, An Baojia, who participated in the rights protection, uttered a voice on Weibo, responding to why he did not perform a third-party appraisal. He said that “testing cannot keep up with technology” and it is difficult for authoritative appraisal agencies to be the dilemma faced by car owners after the current smart car controversy.

On Weibo, Anbaojia first expressed joy that Tesla started to provide data. He expressed his gratitude to the motherland and human rights defenders. “There was no clear relevant legal basis before. (Background data) Tesla did not give it, and consumers had nothing to do. Consumers found the Consumers Association, and the Consumers Association had nothing to do. In the past few days, they have just received approval from their superiors for pure electric vehicles. Consumers have the right to know the traffic data generated during use and driving, and companies need to provide them unconditionally. With this provision, there will be disputes in the future, and it will be much easier for everyone to get the data.”

It’s not easy to get the data, but Anbaojia raised a second question: “I don’t understand, and I can’t analyze the specific causes of the accident.”

Anbaojia said: “There is a car friend who does related work, but he can’t analyze it. I don’t know which organization can interpret this data.”

The reporter’s inquiry found that most of the vehicle identification agencies recognized by the relevant judicial departments were established earlier. Previously, they basically conducted accident identification for fuel vehicles. Through consultation with several automobile testing agencies, the other party stated that they can perform hardware testing for vehicles, but if there are problems with software or systems, the existing technology of the agency cannot guarantee the detection.

An industry insider who did not want to be named told reporters that in the past, agencies that conducted accident appraisal for fuel vehicles may not be able to adapt to the needs of smart cars. The reason is that smart cars are built on the basis of computer technology, so the effect of car owners stepping on the brakes in the event of an accident is likely to be affected by system calculations. Therefore, traditional appraisal agencies can only appraise whether the brakes in the current situation are normal, and cannot appraise the brakes of the vehicle when an accident occurs. To completely restore the truth of the accident, car companies also need to provide background data.

But even if car companies provide back-end data, whether the back-end data is complete and whether it is modified has become a point of contention. In addition, a service staff member of a testing agency also said that, like many of Tesla’s emerging technologies, testing agencies now do not have equipment testing software. The most “authoritative” may be the manufacturer’s own analysis.

This has caused the smart car accident to return to the embarrassing situation of the manufacturer’s “speaking of one family” without a third-party authoritative corroboration.

In this regard, Anbaojia said that it is an inevitable phenomenon that detection cannot keep up with the development of technology. At present, there are no relevant standards for new energy vehicle controller software testing, and the relevant standards of the computer industry cannot be fully applied to automotive controller software testing, nor can they guide automotive industry engineers to carry out software testing in a comprehensive manner.

It is reported that under the leadership of the National Automobile Standards Committee, the development of large-scale intelligent network car safety standards is currently in full swing.

It is understood that Anbaojia is different from the Henan Car Advocate woman who defends rights on the roof of the car. The reason for defending rights is not the brake failure, but the loss of power of the vehicle. He also said on Weibo: “After Ms. Zhang came out, she must have something to say about Tesla’s data. I can’t speak for her. Each of us has different problems. Regarding the problem of my car, I have just released it recently. Video. Before Ms. Zhang comes out, listen to the professional interpretation.”

According to his account, in March this year, when he was driving a Model S from Nanjing to Shanghai, the vehicle suddenly alarmed: “The power has been reduced and the vehicle is shutting down.” Then, the vehicle stepped on the pedal without any response. He contacted Tesla after-sales service to send the vehicle to the service center, but the customer service staff first stated that the vehicle lost power due to a motor failure, and then believed that the motor problem was caused by Mr. An’s vehicle wading in the water. Anbaojia believed that Tesla was “throwing the pot” and disapproved of the accident.

Original title: Tesla’s new voice of rights defenders: detection can not keep up with technological development

Source: Comprehensive Elephant News Beijing Daily Client @安保佳@ Tesla Process Editor: tf004