Recently, Tesla owners’ rights protection at the Shanghai Auto Show continued to ferment.
On the 22nd, Tesla went on a hot search again. This time, the data was finally released.
30 minutes, over 40 brakes The final braking speed was 118.5 kilometers per hour! On the afternoon of April 22, Tesla China released data for the 30 minutes before the accident. The data showed that in the 30 minutes before the accident, the vehicle had more than 40 records of depressing the brake pedal. Tesla also made a text stating that when the driver stepped on the brake pedal for the last time, the data showed that the speed of the vehicle was 118.5 kilometers per hour. Within 2.7 seconds after the driver stepped on the brake pedal, the maximum brake master cylinder pressure was only 45.9 bar. After that, the driver increased the stepping on the brake pedal, and the brake master cylinder pressure reached 92.7 bar. The front collision warning and automatic emergency braking function were activated (the maximum brake master cylinder pressure reached 140.7bar) and played a role, reducing the amplitude of the collision. 1.8 seconds after the ABS was applied, the system recorded the occurrence of the collision. After the driver stepped on the brake pedal, the vehicle speed continued to decrease, and before the collision, the vehicle speed was reduced to 48.5 kilometers per hour. To sum up, the vehicle is running at a higher speed, and the driver starts to depress the brake pedal with less force. After that, the automatic emergency braking function is activated and takes effect, increasing the braking force and reducing the impact of the collision. The driving system is normally involved in the work and the vehicle speed is reduced. Regarding the condition of the vehicle 30 minutes before the accident, Tesla described the following: In the 30 minutes before the accident, the driver drove the vehicle normally, and there were more than 40 records of depressing the brake pedal. At the same time, the vehicle had multiple times. More than 100 kilometers per hour, and multiple stops occurred. The relevant person in charge of Tesla said that he will unreservedly cooperate with the regulatory authorities to carry out in-depth investigations and openly accept social supervision. Tesla said again late at night: Will cooperate with the investigation without reservation On the evening of April 22, Tesla posted a post on Weibo stating that it once again promised that it would cooperate with the regulatory authorities to carry out in-depth investigations without reservation, and openly accept social supervision. With the consent of the customer, government designation or supervision, the three parties will jointly witness and conduct testing at any qualified and authoritative testing organization across the country. The following is the full text: Dear customers, netizens and media friends: Thank you for your continued attention. We fully accept the decisions of the State Administration of Market Supervision and Zhengzhou Municipal Market Supervision Administration, and do our best to actively cooperate with all relevant investigations, effectively fulfill the main responsibility of quality and safety, and provide consumers with high-quality and safe products and services. As of April 21, we have provided complete driving data (hereinafter referred to as the data) half an hour before the accident, and have proactively contacted and communicated with related parties and reported relevant situations on many occasions. The specific progress is as follows: 1. Communicating progress with the family of the client Ms. Zhang 1. In order to negotiate with customers as soon as possible on the time and form of data provision, on the afternoon of April 22, 2021, our staff contacted Ms. Zhang’s husband several times by phone and text messages, but no reply was received. 2. In order to provide customers with the required data as soon as possible, on the afternoon of April 22, 2021, our company will send the sealed paper version of the data to Ms. Zhang’s registered contact address in our company by express mail, a total of 48 pages , 6697 articles. 3. On the afternoon of April 22, 2021, our customer support department sent the electronic version of the data to Ms. Zhang’s personal mailbox registered in our company via company email. 2. Communicating progress with Zhengzhou Municipal Market Supervision Administration 1. On the afternoon of April 21, 2021, our company took the initiative to communicate with the Zhengdong New District Market Supervision Administration of Zhengzhou City (hereinafter referred to as the Zhengdong New District Municipal Supervision Bureau); at 18:00, our company went to the Zhengdong New District Municipal Supervision Bureau to receive the order as required Rectification notice. 2. At about 11 am on April 22, 2021, our company went to Zhengdong New District Municipal Supervision Bureau to communicate and provide written materials. Zhengdong New District Municipal Supervision Bureau requires our company to provide data directly to customers. 3. During April 21 and 22, 2021, our company communicated with the relevant work comrades of the Zhengdong New District Municipal Supervision Bureau responsible for handling this case many times and submitted application letters, urging third-party appraisal agencies to intervene in the matter and express our willingness to undertake All costs incurred in the appraisal. At present, we have not received any opinions on whether the client concerned agrees to conduct a third-party appraisal, or any suggestions on choosing a specific appraisal and testing agency. In the next step, we will continue to contact customers sincerely and actively, respect the wishes of consumers, and promote the safe resolution of incidents. We have implemented the requirements of the State Administration of Market Supervision and Administration and the Zhengzhou Municipal Market Supervision Administration in the first time strictly and item by item, safeguarded the vital rights and interests of consumers with practical actions, and sincerely won the understanding and support of consumers. We promise once again that we will unreservedly cooperate with the regulatory authorities to carry out in-depth investigations and openly accept social supervision. We are willing to jointly witness with the consent of the customer, government designation or supervision, and conduct testing at any qualified and authoritative testing organization across the country. Thank you again for your understanding. Zhengzhou City Market Supervision Administration: Receive data when both parties are present According to JiMu News, at 5:46 pm on April 22, related Tesla staff told reporters that they had already taken the official seal data to the Zhengzhou Municipal Market Supervision Administration on the morning of the 22nd, but the staff of the bureau suggested that, It is up to the owner of the car involved to dock and receive. According to Elephant News, on the afternoon of the 22nd, the husband of Ms. Anyang Tesla Chezhang told reporters that the staff of the Zhengzhou East District Municipal Supervision Bureau had notified the progress of the matter by telephone. He hoped to return to Zhengzhou with his wife. Under the supervision of the Zhengzhou East District Supervision Bureau, go to the 4S shop to take the driving data away. Tesla’s person responsible for handling the accident said: “We have sent the data email to the customer. The customer has not answered the phone. (We are) sent it to the email address the customer filled in when they bought the car through the company email.” New voice from Tesla rights defenders: Detection cannot keep up with technological development Soon after Tesla announced the situation one minute before the data restoration accident, another car owner, An Baojia, who participated in the rights protection, uttered a voice on Weibo, responding to why he did not perform a third-party appraisal. He said that “testing cannot keep up with technology” and it is difficult for authoritative appraisal agencies to be the dilemma faced by car owners after the current smart car controversy. On Weibo, Anbaojia first expressed joy that Tesla started to provide data. He expressed his gratitude to the motherland and human rights defenders. “There was no clear relevant legal basis before. (Background data) Tesla did not give it, and consumers had no way. Consumers found the Consumers Association, and the Consumers Association had no way. In the past few days, they have just received approval from their superiors. Consumers have the right to know the traffic data generated during use and driving, and companies need to provide them unconditionally. With this provision, there will be disputes in the future, and it will be much easier for everyone to get the data.” It’s not easy to get the data, but Anbaojia raised a second question: “I don’t understand, and I can’t analyze the specific causes of the accident.” Anbaojia said: “There is a car friend who does related work, but he can’t analyze it. I don’t know which organization can interpret this data.” According to a report from the Beijing Daily, most of the vehicle appraisal agencies recognized by the relevant judicial departments were established earlier. Previously, they had basically conducted accident appraisal for fuel vehicles. Through consultation with several automobile testing agencies, the other party stated that they can perform hardware testing for vehicles, but if there are problems with software or systems, the existing technology of the agency cannot guarantee the detection. An industry insider who did not want to be named said that the agencies that conducted accident identification on fuel vehicles in the past may not be able to adapt to the needs of smart cars. The reason is that smart cars are built on the basis of computer technology, so the effect of car owners stepping on the brakes in the event of an accident is likely to be affected by system calculations. Therefore, traditional appraisal agencies can only appraise whether the brakes in the current situation are normal, and cannot appraise the brakes of the vehicle when an accident occurs. To completely restore the truth of the accident, car companies also need to provide background data. But even if car companies provide back-end data, whether the back-end data is complete and whether it has been modified has become a point of contention. In addition, a service staff member of a testing agency also said that, like many of Tesla’s emerging technologies, testing agencies now do not have equipment testing software. The most “authoritative” may be the manufacturer’s own analysis. This has caused the smart car accident to return to the embarrassing situation of the manufacturer’s “speaking of one family” without a third-party authoritative corroboration. Vice President Tao Lin resigns? Tesla: rumors After the Shanghai Auto Show’s rights protection incident was fermented, Tao Lin’s “no compromise” attitude on behalf of Tesla was criticized by the central media. On April 21, Tao Lin was absent from the Boao Forum for Asia, and the voice of her resignation began to circulate on social media. China Business News reported that Tesla responded: This is a rumor, and Mr. Tao is working normally.
You must log in to post a comment.