The car of the female owner of the car’s roof rights defender is still parked in front of Tesla’s Zhongyuan Fota store Henan Business Daily reporter Zeng Lingtong Ma Qianhui article/picture At about 11 am on April 19, a woman wearing a white T-shirt with the words “Brake Failure” printed on the roof of the Tesla show car chanting “Tesla Brake Failure”, and was subsequently arrested by security personnel at the scene. take away. On the morning of April 20, the Shanghai police issued a notice that Zhang was sentenced to administrative detention for 5 days for disrupting public order. On April 22, the relevant Tesla staff responded: “The traffic data of the accident vehicle will be provided before 6 pm.” On the same day, the husband of the human rights defender also spoke. On the evening of April 22, Tesla released the data of the accident vehicle within 30 minutes before the accident. Human rights protection female car owner husband: We are very pleased that the relevant departments have spoken Ms. Zhang is still in detention, and as the situation continues to change, what does the owner of the car think about it? On April 22, a reporter from Henan Business Daily contacted Mr. Li, the husband of a Tesla car who advocated a lady on the roof of the car. In response to the sudden voice of the Zhengzhou market supervision department yesterday, Ms. Zhang’s husband said: “Yesterday, the voice of the Market Supervision Bureau and the Consumer Association made me very gratified. It must be a good thing to have someone’s support. Our real demand is to let Tes Pulling completely solves the technical problem of brake failure and reduces the harm to consumers. The brake failure is terrible.” “It doesn’t matter whether our car is retired or not, it doesn’t matter if we don’t retreat it or not. Now for this purpose, the car is a trivial matter. We have to speak for the public.” Mr. Li said. So how are Ms. Zhang’s family going to face this matter next? “At present, our car is still parked in front of Tesla’s Zhongyuan Fota store. I don’t know how to deal with the car afterwards.” Mr. Li said that Tesla’s handling methods and attitudes made him unacceptable. . As for how to deal with the follow-up, Mr. Li said that he can only decide after meeting with Ms. Zhang, because she is the owner of the car and must respect her opinions. The staff of Zhengdong New Area Market Supervision and Administration Bureau stated, “After Tesla Motors Sales Service (Zhengzhou) Co., Ltd. provides driving data to Ms. Zhang, we will actively organize both parties to find a third-party appraisal agency recognized by both parties for appraisal and supervision. The department will deal with it according to the results of the appraisal and effectively protect the legitimate rights and interests of consumers.” On the evening of April 22, Tesla released the data of the accident vehicle within 30 minutes before the accident. The text stated that the data showed that in the 30 minutes before the accident, the vehicle had more than 40 records of depressing the brake pedal. When the driver stepped on the brake pedal for the last time, the data showed that the speed of the vehicle was 118.5 kilometers per hour. Within 2.7 seconds after the driver stepped on the brake pedal, the maximum brake master cylinder pressure was only 45.9 bar. After that, the driver increased the stepping on the brake pedal, and the brake master cylinder pressure reached 92.7 bar. The front collision warning and automatic emergency braking function were activated (the maximum brake master cylinder pressure reached 140.7bar) and played a role, reducing the amplitude of the collision. 1.8 seconds after the ABS was applied, the system recorded the occurrence of the collision. After the driver stepped on the brake pedal, the vehicle speed continued to decrease, and before the collision, the vehicle speed was reduced to 48.5 kilometers per hour. To sum up, the vehicle is running at a higher speed, and the driver starts to depress the brake pedal with less force. After that, the automatic emergency braking function is activated and takes effect, increasing the braking force and reducing the impact of the collision. The driving system is normally involved in the work and the vehicle speed is reduced. In the 30 minutes before the vehicle accident, the driver drove the vehicle normally, with more than 40 records of depressing the brake pedal. At the same time, the vehicle exceeded 100 kilometers per hour and stopped repeatedly. Data released, what happened 1 minute before the accident On the evening of April 22, Tesla’s official Weibo posted: “We are willing to witness with the consent of the customer, the government’s designation or supervision, the tripartite witnesses, and any qualified and authoritative testing agency across the country will conduct testing.” Lawyer: The entire rights protection incident should be viewed from three perspectives From complaints to coordination of relevant departments, there has been no consensus, and then to car owners’ extreme rights protection detentions. Both car owners and car brands have paid the price. The process of Tesla women’s advocates for women’s rights protection is a microcosm of many extreme rights protection cases. How do professional lawyers view such rights protection? “In fact, the entire’Tesla female owner’s rights defense’ incident, we have to look at it from three perspectives,” said Qin Ming, the director of the Commercial Criminal Department of Beijing Jingshi (Zhengzhou) Law Firm. Regarding the practice of defending the rights of the female owner on the roof of the car, Qin Ming believes, “We can understand her feelings, but her practice is undesirable. The rights defense happened in public places and inside the Tesla showroom. So it affected Tesla’s normal business to a certain extent. It was discovered through the video that the lady’s behavior did violate the law on public security management and punishment, so the police eventually took her into administrative detention. This punishment is no problem.” Secondly, after the rights protection incident occurred, Tesla or the relevant staff of the exhibition party “shelf” the rights protection woman out, whether there is any illegal behavior. “After the incident, there were mixed opinions on the Internet. Many people questioned whether Tesla employees took the woman off the car and took temporary control, whether it was suspected of breaking the law. In fact, from my personal point of view, I I feel that there is nothing wrong with this behavior. In fact, any citizen has the right and obligation to stop the behavior after it is discovered that there is an illegal or criminal behavior, and the woman disturbs the normal working order of the Tesla showroom, so she is dragged. It’s actually not a big problem to come down and control it briefly.” Qin Ming said, “We don’t care whether there are quality problems with the car for the time being. Why, after the incident, the status quo of online comments suddenly became a large-scale rights protection site. I think this is also a question that Tesla needs to reflect on. In addition, as the most important Tesla is also obliged to provide information such as driving data recorded in important driving computers to consumers.” Finally, attorney Qin Ming reminded consumers that when encountering rights protection matters, they must take reasonable and legal ways, and be calm and rational. “Only in this way can we better protect ourselves and safeguard our rights.” Qin Ming said.
You must log in to post a comment.